CoachD wrote:You cannot compare the post up game of Hawes to Bargnani. Bargnani is a far superior low post threat this season.
How can you say that?
Hawes' initial offense is being inside. 53% of Hawes' offense is inside/around the post area. And getting most of his points there (6.0 points). Bargnani's initial offense is outside/perimeter. A staggering 75% of Bargnani's offense is perimeter based (and he gets most of his points there: 10.6 points). And only 25% are inside offensive opportunity (4.6 points).
How can you say Bargnani possess a
superior post offense/threat over a player like Hawes that plays
more inside and initiate more of the offense down there?
Well, did Bargnani improved from last year in terms of being a post threat? Absolutely. He is converting his inside opportunities much better. From .589% eFG last year to .638% eFG this year. And creating his own shot better from last year (68% of his inside opportunities were assisted. This year, he is being assisted 60% of the time. Not a whole lot of significant change but it's improving).
I think your post was misinformed and too quick dismissing Hawes' post game. Or at the very least, you did not elaborate what improvements Bargnani did over this year from last year.
I think Hawes is a better post up threat than Bargnani now. If you want to put it into context, Hawes' isn't close filling up his frame. His body maturity is still limiting him to be very productive in the post. I think Hawes can be one of the best low post threats in the NBA once he gets work into his body and his overall consistency being in the post. It's almost scary to think about it. The kid is only 21 years old (just 1 year older than Tyreke Evans), his upside in terms of post dominance is excellent. Hawes' post skill set is advance for his age. He literally has shown us every post move out there at least once throughout his career. It's almost underrated with Kings fans to some extent.