MIN/OKC/CHI
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
MIN/OKC/CHI
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,834
- And1: 1,126
- Joined: Apr 10, 2008
- Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
-
MIN/OKC/CHI
MIN IN: Deng Harden
MIN OUT: Jefferson
OKC IN: Jefferson
OKC OUT: Harden Green Thomas
CHI IN: Green Thomas
CHI OUT: Deng
MIN OUT: Jefferson
OKC IN: Jefferson
OKC OUT: Harden Green Thomas
CHI IN: Green Thomas
CHI OUT: Deng

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
Absolutely.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,299
- And1: 40
- Joined: Sep 19, 2005
- Location: An Igloo
-
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
hell no.
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
Ha
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
- freakafied
- Ballboy
- Posts: 5
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 14, 2010
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
Why do people still coming up with trades that include jefferson. Kahn clearly stated he will not trade jefferson this season.
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
freakafied wrote:Why do people still coming up with trades that include jefferson. Kahn clearly stated he will not trade jefferson this season.
Because we have nothing better to do.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,834
- And1: 1,126
- Joined: Apr 10, 2008
- Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
-
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
Krapinsky wrote:freakafied wrote:Why do people still coming up with trades that include jefferson. Kahn clearly stated he will not trade jefferson this season.
Because we have nothing better to do.
Contrary to what J2J told you, we're not saving teh kittens and teh puppies.

Btw, don't subscribe to his beach swimsuit edition newsletter. It's not bad quality, but you'll notice he's really just taking pictures secretly while ducking behind a trash can.

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
- IAmTheTruth
- Junior
- Posts: 313
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 28, 2010
- Location: Minnesota
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
I loved Harden before the draft. Now, not so much. He's undersized and not athletic. Deng is overpaid and too risky. Hell naw to this trade.
Don't ban me
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,291
- And1: 19,304
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
I think it comes down to whether people see Deng as a good player on an OK contract, or on a bad contract. I am the latter, so I'd keep Al, but its a very well-designed trade.
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
- john2jer
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,304
- And1: 452
- Joined: May 26, 2006
- Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
-
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
cpfsf wrote:Krapinsky wrote:freakafied wrote:Why do people still coming up with trades that include jefferson. Kahn clearly stated he will not trade jefferson this season.
Because we have nothing better to do.
Contrary to what J2J told you, we're not saving teh kittens and teh puppies.
Btw, don't subscribe to his beach swimsuit edition newsletter. It's not bad quality, but you'll notice he's really just taking pictures secretly while ducking behind a trash can.
Bah, forget the kittens, we got microwaves for them. But I like zee puppehs!
And taking pictures while hiding behind a trash can saves on modeling fees. Cost containment so I can pass the savings on to you.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
- karch34
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,887
- And1: 864
- Joined: Jul 05, 2001
- Location: Valley of the Sun
-
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
How about:
MN Gives: Cardinal & Gomes
MN Gets: Deng & Chicago 1st 2010
Boston Gives: Ray Allen & 1st 2010
Bostson Gets: Gomes, Salmons, and Hinrich
Chicago Gives: Deng, Salmons, Hinrich, and 1st 2010
Chicago Gets: Ray Allen, Brian Cardinal, and Boston 1st 2010
A variation of the principles in this was on Rube Chat.
Boston: Improves their bench dramatically
Chicago: Can still compete with Allen this year, but clears major cap space.
If we're worried about our future space under the cap, we could include Sessions to the Bulls for Pargo's expiring. If someone wants to do the math I think we'd only have $5 million less in cap space than if we didn't make any trade and kept Gomes and Sessions. Plus the downgrade in backup PG from Sessions to Pargo would still keep us strong in the ping pong ball hunt.
MN Gives: Cardinal & Gomes
MN Gets: Deng & Chicago 1st 2010
Boston Gives: Ray Allen & 1st 2010
Bostson Gets: Gomes, Salmons, and Hinrich
Chicago Gives: Deng, Salmons, Hinrich, and 1st 2010
Chicago Gets: Ray Allen, Brian Cardinal, and Boston 1st 2010
A variation of the principles in this was on Rube Chat.
Boston: Improves their bench dramatically
Chicago: Can still compete with Allen this year, but clears major cap space.
If we're worried about our future space under the cap, we could include Sessions to the Bulls for Pargo's expiring. If someone wants to do the math I think we'd only have $5 million less in cap space than if we didn't make any trade and kept Gomes and Sessions. Plus the downgrade in backup PG from Sessions to Pargo would still keep us strong in the ping pong ball hunt.
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
karch34 wrote:How about:
MN Gives: Cardinal & Gomes
MN Gets: Deng & Chicago 1st 2010
Boston Gives: Ray Allen & 1st 2010
Bostson Gets: Gomes, Salmons, and Hinrich
Chicago Gives: Deng, Salmons, Hinrich, and 1st 2010
Chicago Gets: Ray Allen, Brian Cardinal, and Boston 1st 2010
A variation of the principles in this was on Rube Chat.
Boston: Improves their bench dramatically
Chicago: Can still compete with Allen this year, but clears major cap space.
If we're worried about our future space under the cap, we could include Sessions to the Bulls for Pargo's expiring. If someone wants to do the math I think we'd only have $5 million less in cap space than if we didn't make any trade and kept Gomes and Sessions. Plus the downgrade in backup PG from Sessions to Pargo would still keep us strong in the ping pong ball hunt.
I can't see Boston doing that.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,000
- And1: 17
- Joined: Dec 05, 2006
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
Not interested,
I wouldn't mind Harden, but Deng is a for sure deal breaker... Deng isn't worth an expiring to Minnesota, he's paid too much for Minnesota to take him in (he's earning his money right now, but IMO he's way too inconsistent to pay that kind of money for).
I wouldn't mind Harden, but Deng is a for sure deal breaker... Deng isn't worth an expiring to Minnesota, he's paid too much for Minnesota to take him in (he's earning his money right now, but IMO he's way too inconsistent to pay that kind of money for).
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
- Foye
- Club Captain- German Soccer
- Posts: 25,056
- And1: 3,613
- Joined: Jul 29, 2008
- Location: Frankfurt
-
Re: MIN/OKC/CHI
I'd deal for Harden and Deng if we were offering expirings but for Al Jefferson is a joke.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves