ImageImageImage

MIN/OKC/CHI

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

cpfsf
General Manager
Posts: 8,834
And1: 1,126
Joined: Apr 10, 2008
Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
 

MIN/OKC/CHI 

Post#1 » by cpfsf » Fri Feb 12, 2010 1:45 am

MIN IN: Deng Harden
MIN OUT: Jefferson

OKC IN: Jefferson
OKC OUT: Harden Green Thomas

CHI IN: Green Thomas
CHI OUT: Deng
Image

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: MIN/OKC/CHI 

Post#2 » by Krapinsky » Fri Feb 12, 2010 2:16 am

Absolutely.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
dunkonu21
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,299
And1: 40
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Location: An Igloo
   

Re: MIN/OKC/CHI 

Post#3 » by dunkonu21 » Fri Feb 12, 2010 2:42 am

hell no.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: MIN/OKC/CHI 

Post#4 » by Krapinsky » Fri Feb 12, 2010 2:44 am

Ha
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
freakafied
Ballboy
Posts: 5
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 14, 2010

Re: MIN/OKC/CHI 

Post#5 » by freakafied » Fri Feb 12, 2010 5:38 am

Why do people still coming up with trades that include jefferson. Kahn clearly stated he will not trade jefferson this season.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: MIN/OKC/CHI 

Post#6 » by Krapinsky » Fri Feb 12, 2010 5:43 am

freakafied wrote:Why do people still coming up with trades that include jefferson. Kahn clearly stated he will not trade jefferson this season.


Because we have nothing better to do.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
cpfsf
General Manager
Posts: 8,834
And1: 1,126
Joined: Apr 10, 2008
Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
 

Re: MIN/OKC/CHI 

Post#7 » by cpfsf » Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:48 am

Krapinsky wrote:
freakafied wrote:Why do people still coming up with trades that include jefferson. Kahn clearly stated he will not trade jefferson this season.


Because we have nothing better to do.


Contrary to what J2J told you, we're not saving teh kittens and teh puppies.

Image

Btw, don't subscribe to his beach swimsuit edition newsletter. It's not bad quality, but you'll notice he's really just taking pictures secretly while ducking behind a trash can.
Image

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
User avatar
IAmTheTruth
Junior
Posts: 313
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 28, 2010
Location: Minnesota

Re: MIN/OKC/CHI 

Post#8 » by IAmTheTruth » Fri Feb 12, 2010 7:14 am

I loved Harden before the draft. Now, not so much. He's undersized and not athletic. Deng is overpaid and too risky. Hell naw to this trade.
Don't ban me
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: MIN/OKC/CHI 

Post#9 » by shrink » Fri Feb 12, 2010 1:41 pm

I think it comes down to whether people see Deng as a good player on an OK contract, or on a bad contract. I am the latter, so I'd keep Al, but its a very well-designed trade.
User avatar
john2jer
RealGM
Posts: 15,304
And1: 452
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
 

Re: MIN/OKC/CHI 

Post#10 » by john2jer » Fri Feb 12, 2010 4:03 pm

cpfsf wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:
freakafied wrote:Why do people still coming up with trades that include jefferson. Kahn clearly stated he will not trade jefferson this season.


Because we have nothing better to do.


Contrary to what J2J told you, we're not saving teh kittens and teh puppies.

Image

Btw, don't subscribe to his beach swimsuit edition newsletter. It's not bad quality, but you'll notice he's really just taking pictures secretly while ducking behind a trash can.


Bah, forget the kittens, we got microwaves for them. But I like zee puppehs!

And taking pictures while hiding behind a trash can saves on modeling fees. Cost containment so I can pass the savings on to you.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,887
And1: 864
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

Re: MIN/OKC/CHI 

Post#11 » by karch34 » Fri Feb 12, 2010 10:37 pm

How about:
MN Gives: Cardinal & Gomes
MN Gets: Deng & Chicago 1st 2010

Boston Gives: Ray Allen & 1st 2010
Bostson Gets: Gomes, Salmons, and Hinrich

Chicago Gives: Deng, Salmons, Hinrich, and 1st 2010
Chicago Gets: Ray Allen, Brian Cardinal, and Boston 1st 2010

A variation of the principles in this was on Rube Chat.

Boston: Improves their bench dramatically
Chicago: Can still compete with Allen this year, but clears major cap space.

If we're worried about our future space under the cap, we could include Sessions to the Bulls for Pargo's expiring. If someone wants to do the math I think we'd only have $5 million less in cap space than if we didn't make any trade and kept Gomes and Sessions. Plus the downgrade in backup PG from Sessions to Pargo would still keep us strong in the ping pong ball hunt.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: MIN/OKC/CHI 

Post#12 » by Krapinsky » Fri Feb 12, 2010 10:44 pm

karch34 wrote:How about:
MN Gives: Cardinal & Gomes
MN Gets: Deng & Chicago 1st 2010

Boston Gives: Ray Allen & 1st 2010
Bostson Gets: Gomes, Salmons, and Hinrich

Chicago Gives: Deng, Salmons, Hinrich, and 1st 2010
Chicago Gets: Ray Allen, Brian Cardinal, and Boston 1st 2010

A variation of the principles in this was on Rube Chat.

Boston: Improves their bench dramatically
Chicago: Can still compete with Allen this year, but clears major cap space.

If we're worried about our future space under the cap, we could include Sessions to the Bulls for Pargo's expiring. If someone wants to do the math I think we'd only have $5 million less in cap space than if we didn't make any trade and kept Gomes and Sessions. Plus the downgrade in backup PG from Sessions to Pargo would still keep us strong in the ping pong ball hunt.


I can't see Boston doing that.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
skorff26
Analyst
Posts: 3,000
And1: 17
Joined: Dec 05, 2006

Re: MIN/OKC/CHI 

Post#13 » by skorff26 » Sat Feb 13, 2010 12:06 am

Not interested,

I wouldn't mind Harden, but Deng is a for sure deal breaker... Deng isn't worth an expiring to Minnesota, he's paid too much for Minnesota to take him in (he's earning his money right now, but IMO he's way too inconsistent to pay that kind of money for).
User avatar
Foye
Club Captain- German Soccer
Posts: 25,056
And1: 3,613
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Location: Frankfurt
 

Re: MIN/OKC/CHI 

Post#14 » by Foye » Sat Feb 13, 2010 3:58 pm

I'd deal for Harden and Deng if we were offering expirings but for Al Jefferson is a joke.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves