ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread XII - 2010 Deadline Version

Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33

LyricalRico
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 30,560
And1: 851
Joined: May 23, 2002
Location: Back into the fray!
Contact:
       

Official Trade Thread XII - 2010 Deadline Version 

Post#1 » by LyricalRico » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:25 am

Here's where the conversation left off:

viewtopic.php?f=35&t=979308&start=1485

Continue..
P'Oed
Rookie
Posts: 1,011
And1: 85
Joined: Jun 12, 2007

Re: Official Trade Thread XII - 2010 Deadline Version 

Post#2 » by P'Oed » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:27 am

if I see ONE commercial regarding season tickets next year I seriously might go Martin Lawerence-crazy
colts18
Head Coach
Posts: 7,434
And1: 3,256
Joined: Jun 29, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread XII - 2010 Deadline Version 

Post#3 » by colts18 » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:31 am

The Wizards need to focus on the Summer of 2011. They can get Durant or Melo with enough cap space by making trades like this:

Knicks trade:
Jeffries (Expires in 2011)
Curry (Expires in 2011)
Douglas
2012 First rounder
2014 First Rounder
2010 2nd Round pick
2011 2nd Round pick

Wizards trade:
Miller
James
Expiring contract (Crittendon or Oberto)

Maybe the Knicks include a young player like Chandler, Gallanari, and Hill. The Knicks definitely do that because it gives them a legit shot at LeBron.
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,797
And1: 7,922
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread XII - 2010 Deadline Version 

Post#4 » by montestewart » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:33 am

colts18 wrote:Someone explain to me the obsession with getting under the luxury tax? Who cares if the Wizards have to spend $5-6 Million because they are $3 Million over the Tax. Going under the tax doesn't really give the Wizards any advantages.

It's not an obsession. I don't care if the owner spends $50,000,000 over, and has to pay $50,000,000 in luxury tax, if the team is good. But why trade away two quality players, one of whom would be returning next year and both of whom should have had value to contenders, merely to shed a few million this year and a few million next year.If they shed $5 million, that's $10,000,000 with the tx, plus maybe anothe $2 million in luxury tax distribution, plus shedding $2 million in unwanted salary next year (the difference between Stevenson and Ross). that's $14 million, and then a GM could hold out for expirings and picks in all subsequent trades (especially Miller, who's expiring anyway). If you can come away with $14 million in savings, fans can understand that; if helps get picks later, they can understand it even more; if it helps get to an extremely low payroll that allows taking bad expirings for huge payroll teams in exchange for picks or prospects, maybe someday, the fans will be watching their team win a championship.

Not an obsession, just an interest.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,077
And1: 22,489
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread XII - 2010 Deadline Version 

Post#5 » by nate33 » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:34 am

There was a lot of talk of a follow-up trade involving Oberto or Crittenton for the Dallas TPE. That better happen or EG just got taken to school.

I've tried to be fair-minded about EG but this is just unbelievable. I can understand the lack of future prospects if EG was given the order to cut salary and get under the luxtax at all costs, but it's pathetic that he couldn't even accomplish that. For heaven's sake, I bet Haywood alone could have been traded for enough raw cap space to get under the luxtax.
NoVaO
Ballboy
Posts: 42
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 25, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread XII - 2010 Deadline Version 

Post#6 » by NoVaO » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:39 am

Unbelievable that we got literally nothing of value in this trade...not even a draft pick.
JWizmentality
RealGM
Posts: 14,099
And1: 5,121
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: Cosmic Totality
   

Re: Official Trade Thread XII - 2010 Deadline Version 

Post#7 » by JWizmentality » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:41 am

I swear EG. If I saw you walking your puppy on the street, I'd run it over. :evil:
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,077
And1: 22,489
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread XII - 2010 Deadline Version 

Post#8 » by nate33 » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:42 am

From Bullets Forever:
UPDATE: Mike Fisher at DallasBasketball.com, who's really the go-to guy for Mavericks rumors (he called this portion of the deal a few days ago), says there's actually a second portion of this trade. Dallas has a $2.9 million trade exception from their trade with the Nets, which basically means they can take back any one player who makes between $1.4 and $2.9 million without trading anyone. The two teams are still discussing which Wizards player will go back for that trade exception. The choices are Andray Blatche (no way), Nick Young (doubt it), Fabricio Oberto (please) and Javaris Crittenton (pretty please)

Okay. That's better. At least with the dump of Oberto or Crittenton, the trade makes at least some logical sense. Don't get me wrong, I'm as mad as the next guy at not getting any future prospects back, but I can at least intellectually understand ownership's desire to get under the luxtax and save a boatload of money.
NoVaO
Ballboy
Posts: 42
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 25, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread XII - 2010 Deadline Version 

Post#9 » by NoVaO » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:46 am

Does anybody think, with the new cap room, we'd be able to buy draft picks from financially strapped teams?
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,431
And1: 4,435
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Official Trade Thread XII - 2010 Deadline Version 

Post#10 » by closg00 » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:46 am

nate33 wrote:From Bullets Forever:
UPDATE: Mike Fisher at DallasBasketball.com, who's really the go-to guy for Mavericks rumors (he called this portion of the deal a few days ago), says there's actually a second portion of this trade. Dallas has a $2.9 million trade exception from their trade with the Nets, which basically means they can take back any one player who makes between $1.4 and $2.9 million without trading anyone. The two teams are still discussing which Wizards player will go back for that trade exception. The choices are Andray Blatche (no way), Nick Young (doubt it), Fabricio Oberto (please) and Javaris Crittenton (pretty please)

Okay. That's better. At least with the dump of Oberto or Crittenton, the trade makes at least some logical sense. Don't get me wrong, I'm as mad as the next guy at not getting any future prospects back, but I can at least intellectually understand ownership's desire to get under the luxtax and save a boatload of money.


:nod: This better happen, otherwise Ernie got fleeced again.
User avatar
Zoidberg
Ballboy
Posts: 16
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 12, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread XII - 2010 Deadline Version 

Post#11 » by Zoidberg » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:50 am

Just curious, whats our lineup look like now?

Foye/Boykins
Miller/Young
Howard/McGuire
Jamison/Gooden
Blatche/McGee
:(
JWizmentality
RealGM
Posts: 14,099
And1: 5,121
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: Cosmic Totality
   

Re: Official Trade Thread XII - 2010 Deadline Version 

Post#12 » by JWizmentality » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:50 am

Why do i get the odd sensation that Blatche is the one going.....



wait for it..............
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,077
And1: 22,489
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread XII - 2010 Deadline Version 

Post#13 » by nate33 » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:51 am

Assuming Oberto is included in Part II, the Wizards will have saved $4.2M in cap dollars. That's still not enough to get under the luxtax without further trades. I'm a little surprised that Singleton was included on the way back. The trade worked without him and would have gotten us completely out of the luxtax. I suppose we could ship out DMac and Oberto in Part II.

Nevertheless, we saved about $2M in prorated salary, $4.2M in luxtax payments, and assuming we dump another $600K in a Jamison trade, we will save another $4M in luxtax redistribution. We also saved $4.1M next year with Stevenson gone. All told, we saved about $14.3M in the transaction (plus the $10.6M "savings" of Butler's 2011 salary, if you want to consider the unloading of a fair market contract a savings).
Wisedude42
Sophomore
Posts: 202
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 03, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread XII - 2010 Deadline Version 

Post#14 » by Wisedude42 » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:52 am

Caron Butler is gone. The trade has been officially announced. Haywood is gone. Shawny is gone.
I am gone. See ya.
User avatar
Tyrone Messby
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,650
And1: 728
Joined: Feb 16, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread XII - 2010 Deadline Version 

Post#15 » by Tyrone Messby » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:52 am

LOL if Blatche were the one to go, EG would cause riots in D.C.
P'Oed
Rookie
Posts: 1,011
And1: 85
Joined: Jun 12, 2007

Re: Official Trade Thread XII - 2010 Deadline Version 

Post#16 » by P'Oed » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:55 am

NO MORE MR.50!!!! YAY!

NO MORE MISSED LAYUPS!!! YAY!

NO MORE GUYS PRONE TO PULLING OUT DREADLOCKS!!! YAY!

NO MORE DESHAWN!!! YAY!

NO MORE OVERLY USED CROSSOVER DRIBBLES!! YAY!

NO MORE DADDY LONG LEGS MOVES TOWARD THE BASKET!!! YAY!

NO MORE STEVENSON!!! YAY!


ehh...just trying to be positive...not really working, is it?
Ji
Banned User
Posts: 3,614
And1: 4
Joined: Oct 30, 2003
Location: Ashburn,Va
Contact:

Re: Official Trade Thread XII - 2010 Deadline Version 

Post#17 » by Ji » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:55 am

guys..we cant trade Crittendon..its not allowed by NBA rules
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,797
And1: 7,922
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread XII - 2010 Deadline Version 

Post#18 » by montestewart » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:56 am

closg00 wrote:
nate33 wrote:From Bullets Forever:
UPDATE: Mike Fisher at DallasBasketball.com, who's really the go-to guy for Mavericks rumors (he called this portion of the deal a few days ago), says there's actually a second portion of this trade. Dallas has a $2.9 million trade exception from their trade with the Nets, which basically means they can take back any one player who makes between $1.4 and $2.9 million without trading anyone. The two teams are still discussing which Wizards player will go back for that trade exception. The choices are Andray Blatche (no way), Nick Young (doubt it), Fabricio Oberto (please) and Javaris Crittenton (pretty please)

Okay. That's better. At least with the dump of Oberto or Crittenton, the trade makes at least some logical sense. Don't get me wrong, I'm as mad as the next guy at not getting any future prospects back, but I can at least intellectually understand ownership's desire to get under the luxtax and save a boatload of money.


:nod: This better happen, otherwise Ernie got fleeced again.

Under that trade (the two trades together) the reduction in payroll is $4.2 million, according to the trade machine. Don't they have to cut $4.75 million in salary? If he gets that close but just misses the cut . . . he just misses the cut, again. If Singleton hadn't been in it, the trade would have worked.

QUESTION: Is the TPE figure applied to the full year salary of only to the remaining salary? In other words could a $2 million TPE be used for a $4 million contract that has half a year left, or only for a $2 million contract?

EDIT: I basically repeated what nate33 already wrote.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,077
And1: 22,489
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread XII - 2010 Deadline Version 

Post#19 » by nate33 » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:56 am

Tyrone Messby wrote:LOL if Blatche were the one to go, EG would cause riots in D.C.

What concerns me is that, by my calculations, Blatche is the only contract large enough to get us under the luxtax. The other option would be to trade Oberto plus either DMac or Boykins for their TPE.
mhd
General Manager
Posts: 9,624
And1: 1,672
Joined: Mar 25, 2004

Re: Official Trade Thread XII - 2010 Deadline Version 

Post#20 » by mhd » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:57 am

Nate, what do you think of my James+McGee for Biedrins proposal?

Return to Washington Wizards