ImageImage

Raiders @ Packers Pregame Talk

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
brewcityboii
Rookie
Posts: 1,128
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 28, 2007
Location: BRETT FAVRE >> Any other QB in NFL History!!!

Raiders @ Packers Pregame Talk 

Post#1 » by brewcityboii » Mon Dec 3, 2007 8:33 pm

Well Brett Should Start so that is a plus.

The Raiders in the last 2 weeks have won inside there division for the first time in I believe 3 years IIRC. They beat the Chiefs and the Broncos so I think they will come into the game pumped up.

As for the pack it is going to be really interesting to see how they respond to that loss. I hope they go out there and stick to the game plan.

Glad we got 10 days rest we need as much as we can get, not sure who will all be out yet and who will play.

I am very interested to see how the Passing game holds up in the weather should be cold not sure about any snow or rain tho.


GO PACK GO
User avatar
Fandom
Junior
Posts: 280
And1: 1
Joined: May 22, 2007
Location: burbs

 

Post#2 » by Fandom » Mon Dec 3, 2007 9:51 pm

Does anyone know if JaMarcus is playing?

I heard rumblings about it last week, but nothing new since then...
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 107,804
And1: 42,104
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

 

Post#3 » by ReasonablySober » Mon Dec 3, 2007 9:54 pm

He played 15 snaps and looked good on Sunday. I'm sure he'll be playing at least part-time.
Comet
Veteran
Posts: 2,766
And1: 8
Joined: May 17, 2007
     

 

Post#4 » by Comet » Mon Dec 3, 2007 9:58 pm

I realize there's no such thing as an easy game in the NFL (except the Dolphins :lol:) but this should be an easy win anyway.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 107,804
And1: 42,104
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

 

Post#5 » by ReasonablySober » Mon Dec 3, 2007 10:07 pm

Comet wrote:I realize there's no such thing as an easy game in the NFL (except the Dolphins :lol:) but this should be an easy win anyway.


I certainly don't see this being an easy win.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,581
And1: 4,450
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

 

Post#6 » by Kerb Hohl » Mon Dec 3, 2007 10:14 pm

Neither do I. We need to win this though to keep the heat off from the other division leaders who are charging fast. I would not like to get to a point where either the Seahawks or Bucs are within a game of us with our last 3 games being 2 division rivals battling for playoff spots and an improving Rams squad. I know that it's worrisome thinking but I want to lock this bye up ASAP.
User avatar
MadCityBucky
General Manager
Posts: 9,873
And1: 11
Joined: Jun 21, 2007

 

Post#7 » by MadCityBucky » Mon Dec 3, 2007 10:15 pm

The Raiders have actually been playing well lately. Their offensive line is opening up big holes for Fargas who ran well. McCown managed the games well in which they won. Should be interesting to see who starts between McCown and Culpepper.

If you go the Raiders forums, they still believe the Packers still have no running game at all and that the Raider's CB's can stop the Packer's WR's.

I got dibs on the Game Thread (still undefeated)
jligon
Sophomore
Posts: 224
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 10, 2007

 

Post#8 » by jligon » Mon Dec 3, 2007 10:18 pm

This game worries me.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,581
And1: 4,450
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

 

Post#9 » by Kerb Hohl » Mon Dec 3, 2007 10:18 pm

MadCityBucky wrote:If you go the Raiders forums, they still believe the Packers still have no running game at all and that the Raider's CB's can stop the Packer's WR's.


They must be under the impression that the League of Justice is starting in the defensive backfield for them. If Bly/Bailey couldn't shut our guys down I don't care how young and promising their guys are, Jennings and Driver are going to juke them out like fools and Jones will be flying over the top.

And it's funny they joke about our running game because Ryan Grant is the equivalent of Justin Fargas coming out of nowhere in recent weeks to be a top 10 back in the NFL.
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

 

Post#10 » by El Duderino » Mon Dec 3, 2007 10:20 pm

DrugBust wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I certainly don't see this being an easy win.


I do
User avatar
brewcityboii
Rookie
Posts: 1,128
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 28, 2007
Location: BRETT FAVRE >> Any other QB in NFL History!!!

 

Post#11 » by brewcityboii » Mon Dec 3, 2007 10:22 pm

No way this will be an easy game, the raiders are playing with a lot of fire and a lot of heart. We need to get pressure on Russell/McCown If so we can force mistakes rather easily.

Raiders fans still believe Al Davis is alive.
User avatar
DMBucks22
Veteran
Posts: 2,818
And1: 81
Joined: Sep 12, 2006
Location: Cream City
Contact:
   

 

Post#12 » by DMBucks22 » Mon Dec 3, 2007 10:28 pm

I am excited for this game as I will be going to it. Packers will win this game By 14+ points.
Comet
Veteran
Posts: 2,766
And1: 8
Joined: May 17, 2007
     

 

Post#13 » by Comet » Mon Dec 3, 2007 10:29 pm

I'm not saying we're going to annihilate them, but I doubt this will be a nail-biter either.

Yeah, I know, we're under pressure, Favre's not 100%, we're still kind of banged-up, Oakland's played well of late, blah blah blah....

But consider this. They're in last place in a weak division. Regardless of who starts for them at quarterback, they're not going to have much success there. Russell is raw, and McCown's performance yesterday was only a fluke. Although they tough secondary, they have no run defense whatsoever.

This should be a relaxing game. Let's just keep winning our games (which we will), and let's hope the Cowboys lose some (oh, and thanks Brett for the turnovers and thanks refs for the interference call).
jligon
Sophomore
Posts: 224
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 10, 2007

 

Post#14 » by jligon » Mon Dec 3, 2007 11:31 pm

Comet wrote:But consider this. They're in last place in a weak division. Regardless of who starts for them at quarterback, they're not going to have much success there. Russell is raw, and McCown's performance yesterday was only a fluke. Although they tough secondary, they have no run defense whatsoever.

Every team in that division has given us trouble this year. I wouldn't be surprised in Oakland did too. I see us overmatching them but if we don't put them away by the fourth quarter and find ourselves in a situation where a late turnover could decide the game, it could be one of those sickening losses, not unlike Chicago. I hope I'm wrong.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

 

Post#15 » by xTitan » Mon Dec 3, 2007 11:41 pm

I think its a HUGE game for GB and one they need to win walking away......this is there first loss after many have viewed them as elite, so it will be interesting to see how the team bounces back. It will also be a huge game for Favre, this was his first aweful game since very early in the season, I am hopeful he will bounce back and stick to the gameplan, take the short game, allow your many playmakers to make plays and pick your spots to go deep.
Thunder Muscle
RealGM
Posts: 15,610
And1: 1,266
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Location: WI
       

 

Post#16 » by Thunder Muscle » Tue Dec 4, 2007 2:01 am

I see this as one of those grind it out sluggish games. Oakland is playing better ball, we're coming off a loss and a long layoff. I just see this one not being as easy as some think. I think in the end the Packers pull it off, but I don't really see us blowing them out. Dangerous game.
jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 16,726
And1: 8,134
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

 

Post#17 » by jakecronus8 » Tue Dec 4, 2007 4:29 pm

I have a bad feeling about this...
Do it for Chuck
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 27,700
And1: 15,232
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: Damn that rilamann!!
     

 

Post#18 » by rilamann » Tue Dec 4, 2007 10:24 pm

jakecronus8 wrote:I have a bad feeling about this...


I don't have a bad feeling about this one I have bad feeling about next when we play the Rams in St Louis,hopefully we are both wrong.

Vs the Raiders I definatly think the Packers will win but I don't think it will be a huge blowout but a comfortable win something like,

Packers 27
Raiders 17
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
User avatar
DMBucks22
Veteran
Posts: 2,818
And1: 81
Joined: Sep 12, 2006
Location: Cream City
Contact:
   

 

Post#19 » by DMBucks22 » Tue Dec 4, 2007 10:37 pm

Anyone else going to this game........
User avatar
brewcityboii
Rookie
Posts: 1,128
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 28, 2007
Location: BRETT FAVRE >> Any other QB in NFL History!!!

 

Post#20 » by brewcityboii » Tue Dec 4, 2007 10:46 pm

DMBucks22 wrote:Anyone else going to this game........



I will be there 5 yard line packer side row 23 wearing my cheese and Sausage necklace of course.

Return to Green Bay Packers