ImageImage

To clinch division...

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,762
And1: 6,963
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

To clinch division... 

Post#1 » by LUKE23 » Mon Dec 3, 2007 5:36 am

Worst Packers can do is 10-6.

Lions lose, go to 6-6. Best they can do is 10-6, we need to take divison tiebreaker from them still if they beat us.

Bears lose, best they can do is 9-7.

Vikings win, go to 6-6. Best they can do is 10-6, we take tiebreaker.


EDIT: NEVERMIND, FORGOT WE ONLY PLAYED DETROIT ONCE.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,762
And1: 6,963
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

 

Post#2 » by LUKE23 » Mon Dec 3, 2007 5:43 am

MadCityBucky wrote::clap: Sweet, didn't realize that. Now to clinch the first round bye and maybe now home field advantage.

Figuring the Packers clinch the first round bye, what team would you least like to meet in the NFC divisional game?


I was actually wrong, we didn't totally clinch over Lions. If they beat us last game of the year and we're tied at 10-6, it will have to go to divisional record first, then common games.
User avatar
MadCityBucky
General Manager
Posts: 9,873
And1: 11
Joined: Jun 21, 2007

 

Post#3 » by MadCityBucky » Mon Dec 3, 2007 5:50 am

LUKE23 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I was actually wrong, we didn't totally clinch over Lions. If they beat us last game of the year and we're tied at 10-6, it will have to go to divisional record first, then common games.


:oops:

Should clinch the division next week with a win over Oakland and Lions loss to Dallas though.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 107,808
And1: 42,119
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

 

Post#4 » by ReasonablySober » Mon Dec 3, 2007 6:12 am

Magic number is one. Either a Lions loss or a Packer win and the division is Green Bay's.

What I most want is that first round bye. Once that happens it's time to sit some starters.
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

 

Post#5 » by El Duderino » Mon Dec 3, 2007 8:31 am

Winning the division was a forgone conclusion for me a few weeks ago, it was pretty obvious nobody in the division was good enough to eventually catch the Packers.
eagle13
Head Coach
Posts: 6,145
And1: 107
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: san diego

 

Post#6 » by eagle13 » Mon Dec 3, 2007 1:22 pm

This is useless thread. Pack had division locked for all reality 2 weeks ago.

GB wins next week AND Detroit looses.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 107,808
And1: 42,119
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

 

Post#7 » by ReasonablySober » Mon Dec 3, 2007 4:24 pm

eagle13 wrote:This is useless thread. Pack had division locked for all reality 2 weeks ago.

GB wins next week AND Detroit looses.


If Green Bay wins next week, the worst they could end up would be 11-5.

Even if the Lions win, the best they could end up would be 10-6.

Like I said, magic number is one.

So you see, the thread obviously isn't completely useless. You learned something. :P
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 27,700
And1: 15,232
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: Damn that rilamann!!
     

 

Post#8 » by rilamann » Tue Dec 4, 2007 12:28 am

DrugBust wrote:Magic number is one. Either a Lions loss or a Packer win and the division is Green Bay's.

What I most want is that first round bye. Once that happens it's time to sit some starters.


Yea getting that first rd bye is huge.

There is a much bigger diffrence between the #2 seed & #3 seed than the #1 seed & #2 seed in the NFL obviously.

with a #2 seed of course all you have to do is win one 1 at home and 1 on the road and your in the super bowl,thats definalty do-able for the Packers.

If the Packers got bumped down to the #3 seed and had to play a wild card game then had to play/win 2 on the road to advance to the super bowl i'd say the Packers chances of winning the NFC would be very silm.

Thats why those 2 times we went 12-4 under Mike Sherman the Packers realy didn't have a real shot to win the NFC.

Im sure you remember in 2002 when we went 12-4 we got the #3 seed because of the Eagles and Rams both going 12-4 and winning the tie breakers,then in 2001 when we went 12-4 and we acutually got bumped down to the #4 seed because the Bears had that fluke 13-3 season and won the central division.

That sucked because 90% of time 12-4 is good enough for at least the #2 seed.The Packers just had bad timing to go 12-4 in 2001 & 2002 I guess.

When we went 12-4 in 2001 we should have done it a year earlier,in 2000 the Giants got the #1 seed and homefield with an 11-5 record.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
Thunder Muscle
RealGM
Posts: 15,612
And1: 1,266
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Location: WI
       

 

Post#9 » by Thunder Muscle » Tue Dec 4, 2007 1:34 am

I just remember the year they could've gotten a bye, but got a** f*cked by the Jets the last game of the season...and then let the Falcons come in and beat us in the first Packer playoff loss ever in Lambeau. Tough times.

I just want to get that bye. I don't like the fact Seattle and Tampa Bay are playing good ball right now. On paper the Packers have a favorable schedule, but they need to take care of business. I have a feeling they could be sluggish against Oakland. Oakland is coming off a win too. At St. Louis has never been too kind to the Pack, and they're playing a little better lately as well. At Bears is always a dangerous game. Obviously they beat us already. I think we'll take the Lions the last game of the year.

Just try to take 3 of 4 and we'll get it.

Return to Green Bay Packers