ImageImageImageImageImage

Sacramento (20-39) @ Oklahoma City (35-23)

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

?

bonnie
7
70%
Jenn
3
30%
 
Total votes: 10

cuad
Banned User
Posts: 5,371
And1: 2
Joined: May 26, 2009

Re: Sacramento (20-39) @ Oklahoma City (35-23) 

Post#41 » by cuad » Wed Mar 3, 2010 3:08 am

Good catch Evans.
cuad
Banned User
Posts: 5,371
And1: 2
Joined: May 26, 2009

Re: Sacramento (20-39) @ Oklahoma City (35-23) 

Post#42 » by cuad » Wed Mar 3, 2010 3:12 am

Garcia!!!!!!!!!!!! omg what kind of voodoo layup was that?
ICMTM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,347
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: Sacramento, Ca
     

Re: Sacramento (20-39) @ Oklahoma City (35-23) 

Post#43 » by ICMTM » Wed Mar 3, 2010 3:16 am

dang cuad...I wish someone else would talk to you.
KANGZZZZZ!
a-rod
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,778
And1: 21
Joined: Aug 12, 2006
Location: Rest In Peace Dad
Contact:
       

Re: Sacramento (20-39) @ Oklahoma City (35-23) 

Post#44 » by a-rod » Wed Mar 3, 2010 3:16 am

Are we trying to tank?
pillwenney wrote:
SacKingZZZ wrote:No thanks to Deng. I read a rumor surfing hoopshype awhile back saying Gay for Reke is a possibility.


Must be true, if it's a rumor you read on Hoopshype.
:rofl:
User avatar
JSrose115
Junior
Posts: 492
And1: 10
Joined: May 03, 2009

Re: Sacramento (20-39) @ Oklahoma City (35-23) 

Post#45 » by JSrose115 » Wed Mar 3, 2010 3:32 am

i think hawes in his mind is trying to tank, looking like dwight howard out there, pulling down 3 rebounds in 32 minutes.
ICMTM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,347
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: Sacramento, Ca
     

Re: Sacramento (20-39) @ Oklahoma City (35-23) 

Post#46 » by ICMTM » Wed Mar 3, 2010 3:36 am

a-rod wrote:Are we trying to tank?


No. I think we played a fair game. The problem is that this front court isn't the best defensively. When we don't rebound it makes it all that more worse.

We didn't play bad. The Thunder just played a little better.
KANGZZZZZ!
Norbit
Sophomore
Posts: 166
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 19, 2008

Re: Sacramento (20-39) @ Oklahoma City (35-23) 

Post#47 » by Norbit » Wed Mar 3, 2010 3:37 am

God it's sick how I love when our kings play great and lose. Keep it up! Frank the tankkkkkkkk
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 92,813
And1: 37,037
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

Re: Sacramento (20-39) @ Oklahoma City (35-23) 

Post#48 » by RIPskaterdude » Wed Mar 3, 2010 3:58 am

Spencer Hawes:

Image

Where "shooting 3's is more important than rebounds" happens.
Image
cdt3
Rookie
Posts: 1,183
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 17, 2008

Re: Sacramento (20-39) @ Oklahoma City (35-23) 

Post#49 » by cdt3 » Wed Mar 3, 2010 4:22 am

Hawes and Landry and Greene combined for 3 more rebounds than Kristic and 2 more than Durant.

This team misses Thompson and Brockman.

What is the Maloofs obsession against skinny big men? OK City is bright and filled with skinny men. Portland also has all skinny big men.

This team was working very well early this season with the Greene/Thompson/Hawes frontline.

The difference bewteen OKC, Portland or Sac is they stuck with the drafted core through good and bad. The Kings have had 85 different lineups this year. You need stability to win in the long term in the NBA.
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Sacramento (20-39) @ Oklahoma City (35-23) 

Post#50 » by SacKingZZZ » Wed Mar 3, 2010 6:00 am

This isn't a bad defensive frontcourt. The rebounding was a problem and it very well could be from here on, but Spencer and Carl didn't play terrible defense, it was just when they did make a mistake the Thunder capitalized on it. I still say the pace of the game was the problem, the 2nd half was way more our style but it was already too late, the Thunder were too hot by that point. Moving forward it would be really nice to have a SF that can help pick up some of slack in the rebounding department. Defensively Spencer switched off to help a lot and there was nobody back there to help on the boards, but he certainly needs to rack up some more defensive boards.

Still, I'm happy with the game overall. Another SOLID 4 quarters in which we hung with one of the toughest and best rebounding teams at home. It was also a game in which this team saw a lot of zone D, something that usually grinds this team to a halt. Westphal has to give Dorsey some more minutes though!!! He was playing some great help D when he was in there.
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Sacramento (20-39) @ Oklahoma City (35-23) 

Post#51 » by SacKingZZZ » Wed Mar 3, 2010 6:05 am

cdt3 wrote:Hawes and Landry and Greene combined for 3 more rebounds than Kristic and 2 more than Durant.

This team misses Thompson and Brockman.

What is the Maloofs obsession against skinny big men? OK City is bright and filled with skinny men. Portland also has all skinny big men.

This team was working very well early this season with the Greene/Thompson/Hawes frontline.

The difference bewteen OKC, Portland or Sac is they stuck with the drafted core through good and bad. The Kings have had 85 different lineups this year. You need stability to win in the long term in the NBA.



Oh, how I miss Brockman! Would have loved to see him play tonight. :(
User avatar
Dustin5566
Veteran
Posts: 2,804
And1: 64
Joined: Jul 23, 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Re: Sacramento (20-39) @ Oklahoma City (35-23) 

Post#52 » by Dustin5566 » Wed Mar 3, 2010 6:09 am

xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:Spencer Hawes:

Image

Where "shooting 3's is more important than rebounds" happens.


OR

Spencer Hawes, where "letting Nenad Krstic get wide open dunks all night" happens.
Image
User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,887
And1: 2,603
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

Re: Sacramento (20-39) @ Oklahoma City (35-23) 

Post#53 » by pillwenney » Wed Mar 3, 2010 10:38 am

Well, you guys can imagine my frustration when I was at work until nearly 2, looking forward the whole night to coming home and watching a recording of the Kings game only to find out it was one of the couple games a year league pass just doesn't cover for some reason.

Anyway, it seems we played pretty well. Losing by a few to the Thunder on the road is satisfactory for me. It seems rebounding was the real problem. Chalk it up to not having JT or Brock, I suppose.

Man, what a letdown that I couldn't watch it though.
User avatar
darkadun
Pro Prospect
Posts: 956
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 14, 2008
Location: Caprica

Re: Sacramento (20-39) @ Oklahoma City (35-23) 

Post#54 » by darkadun » Wed Mar 3, 2010 5:30 pm

I agree, we miss JT's rebounding. When JT comes back, it'd be nice if he can stay on the floor and really clear the boards for us. If he can develop into a solid D player without picking up crap fouls, and really control the boards, he would be the big man we need next to Landry and Hawes.

Hawes didn't play terrible D, he made a few mistakes letting Nenad get a backdoor dunk, but that happens when you have threats like Westbrook and Durant out there. The D wasn't the real issue last night IMO. It was the 22 second chance points. If you rebound a little better and cut those in half, we win the game. Period. Rebounding is a concern obviously, but OKC is 3rd in the league in rebounding, which is surprising.

But hey, I'm glad we played well and were right there. OKC played a great game and we lost by 6 on the road. They've won 12 of 14, thats pretty damn impressive. I know if I met them in the first round of the playoffs, they would be a scary team to face. I would not be surprised if they knocked off a team like Utah.
Sometimes you just have to look yourself in the mirror and say....Tyreke Evans.
That just happened.

Return to Sacramento Kings