hermitkid wrote:Hoopalotta wrote:
I am thinking some of it is the Haywood effect. Wizards fans are used to really good post defense from the center spot. I watched the Memphis-New York game a few nights after we played each club and Gasol imparted a very similar dollop of destruction onto an exasperated David Lee (yes, said buttress of interior defense, I know).
At least for me it's certainly not the Haywood effect. It's watching a kid struggle with some pretty fundamental things on defense.
Losing your man, getting completely turned around, poor footwork and positioning, not boxing out, getting lost in no-mans-land on rotations, there's just so much fail that it's hard to remain patient.
After 1.5 years in this league I'd expect to see more out of the guy than grandstanding and his ridiculous salutes every time he gets a dunk.
Early on, Haywood looked lost also.
Hands of stone. Poor footwork. Didn't finish strong and brought the ball down to low so it got stolen. Traveled a lot. Could dribble well. Got blown by and dunked over. Couldn't shoot free throws. Had no post moves and people said he was a black hole if you passed him the ball. And he was said to not bring it consistently. Poor motor. To soft. He was nick named Brenda and most wanted him gone.
But Haywood put in the work. He found the weight room. He learned to keep the ball high. He learned a post move or two. His footwork got better and he became a great defender. And then he got his FT shooting going.
It took time but with hard work, he turned himself into a force.
I think McGee will start off developing a much better offensive game than Haywood. He is a much more athletic big then Haywood was. Better raw materials.
We will see a lot of growth from McGee between now and the end of the year. Then like Dray and like Haywood did, he will need to put in the work.
Only question for me right now is how much growth can he get done this year. We aren't going to see consistency this year so just look for higher highs and not so low of lows. Just like a good stock.






















