montestewart wrote:clipocketurs wrote:Washington already traded Jamison, Butler, and Haywood for cap space. Trading Arenas would complete the overhaul. Rebuilding through the draft like OKC (Durant, Westbrook, Harden, Green, Ibaka) and Portland (Roy, Oden, Aldridge, Batum, Bayless, Webster, Fernandez) is ideal. But it takes some luck of course in drafting the right players and not wasting the picks.
Having Arenas on the team will add more wins but likely not a championship. It would be different if he was 24 instead of 28. A lot of fans would rather get a high draft pick in the hopes of getting a future star player to build around like Durant and Roy.
It's been pointed out that without Arenas' salary, the team is well below the minimum. Someone has to make that green. I'm not knocking the build-through-the-draft scenarios you mention, but they haven't won too much yet, and I don't see why that model can't coexist for awhile with Arenas, for the aforementioned salary reasons. If a trade arises that get a player that's a better fit than Arenas, or a high draft pick, I can understand a trade. I don't understand the rush to dump his salary at this point. He may come back achieve greater value, something a little more than Eddie Curry's expiring.
Agreed. Trading Gil for MORE cap room is overkill when we have no idea what to do with the massive cap space & flexibility already. It's like the 'law of diminishing returns'. More cap room isn't necessarily going to improve our outlook. In fact it's going to be pretty damn hard replacing the production Gil would give us from the perimeter.
LeBron & Wade in reality are pipe dreams.
We could give Joe Johnson max money I guess to steal him away from Atl & NY but would we any better off?