ImageImageImageImageImage

Farmar: Bench poison?

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

User avatar
Mindflayer
Rookie
Posts: 1,197
And1: 12
Joined: Mar 28, 2005
     

Re: Farmar: Bench poison? 

Post#21 » by Mindflayer » Wed Apr 7, 2010 3:10 am

I can understand why Farmer is mad. He sits on the bench watcuing Fisher play no defense, make no passes worth a damn, make bad decisions, and chuck up bad shots as a starter. Farmer sits there and thinks I can do all that and occasionly make a decent pass to get an easy basket for this team. He is right; the problem lies in the fact he is better than the worse starting PG in the league; but barely better, without the intangibles.
MaryvalesFinest wrote:
"J-Rich is a better dunker than Kobe and can put up the same stats if he was "the man" of the Lakers, advantage = J-Rich"
semi-sentient
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,149
And1: 5,624
Joined: Feb 23, 2005
Location: Austin, Tejas
 

Re: Farmar: Bench poison? 

Post#22 » by semi-sentient » Wed Apr 7, 2010 8:02 am

Mindflayer wrote:I can understand why Farmer is mad. He sits on the bench watcuing Fisher play no defense, make no passes worth a damn, make bad decisions, and chuck up bad shots as a starter. Farmer sits there and thinks I can do all that and occasionly make a decent pass to get an easy basket for this team. He is right; the problem lies in the fact he is better than the worse starting PG in the league; but barely better, without the intangibles.


I'm going to have to agree with that. Farmar is the guy that should be starting and everyone knows it. Fisher brings almost nothing to the table except his supposed "leadership". His court production is awful and many times costly. The fact that several of us would even suggest that Farmar be a starter is a testament to just how sorry Fisher is these days.
"Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere." - Carl Sagan
H00PDREAMS
Veteran
Posts: 2,833
And1: 113
Joined: Oct 26, 2005
Location: Lompoc, CA/ Santa Barbara County
Contact:
 

Re: Farmar: Bench poison? 

Post#23 » by H00PDREAMS » Wed Apr 7, 2010 4:11 pm

I just dont get it hall of famer Hubie Brown, Jalen Rose, Anderson, Ford, Miller, Van Gundy and Fatello, I have all heard say these amazing things about Farmar. Yet it seems this is lost on Jackson. Is it the system Is that why Farmar's game isnt't giving the Lakers 16pts 10 Ast games every night.

Less we forget Farmar did come out of a UCLA that had some top line NBA ready gaurds and I think most were playing behind him. Collison anyone?! Affallo, hello? Why don't we let this kid loose or trade him already. If he was on the Knicks this guy would be showing his butt off! Dantoni would just fall in love with this kid's game I bet. I jut have this feeling if the Lakers let him go, he will spend his whole career making sure the Laker orginization never lives it down.

By the way anyone catch Farmar at CHAMPS in Northridge last night? My sister said there was a huge crowd.
User avatar
LakerZombie
Sophomore
Posts: 190
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 27, 2007

Re: Farmar: Bench poison? 

Post#24 » by LakerZombie » Wed Apr 7, 2010 5:16 pm

Mindflayer wrote:I can understand why Farmer is mad. He sits on the bench watcuing Fisher play no defense, make no passes worth a damn, make bad decisions, and chuck up bad shots as a starter. Farmer sits there and thinks I can do all that and occasionly make a decent pass to get an easy basket for this team. He is right; the problem lies in the fact he is better than the worse starting PG in the league; but barely better, without the intangibles.



I agree with this. He SHOULD be starting. He does make mistakes but no where near the costly mistakes that Fisher makes. Plus he can play better defense and create his own shot off the dribble.

Maybe i was right...he is bench poison because he doesnt belong on the bench. Which would make Fisher starer poison. Love Fish and he DOES bring leadership but we need to him anchor off the bench and not as a starter. Both he and Phil though are so set in their ways that it would take an act of congress for either to budge on putting Farmar in his place.

I may not agree with Farmar's attitude with still coming off the bench but i can see why he is frustrated watching an aging PG eat up valuable minutes. :(
semi-sentient
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,149
And1: 5,624
Joined: Feb 23, 2005
Location: Austin, Tejas
 

Re: Farmar: Bench poison? 

Post#25 » by semi-sentient » Wed Apr 7, 2010 5:23 pm

LakerZombie wrote:Both he and Phil though are so set in their ways that it would take an act of congress for either to budge on putting Farmar in his place.


Fisher would be 50 by the time congress acted. :(
"Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere." - Carl Sagan
User avatar
LakerZombie
Sophomore
Posts: 190
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 27, 2007

Re: Farmar: Bench poison? 

Post#26 » by LakerZombie » Wed Apr 7, 2010 5:34 pm

semi-sentient wrote:
Fisher would be 50 by the time congress acted. :(


Touche' :lol:
User avatar
LakerZombie
Sophomore
Posts: 190
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 27, 2007

Re: Farmar: Bench poison? 

Post#27 » by LakerZombie » Wed Apr 7, 2010 6:01 pm

Here another point.....Phil is always worrying about Fisher's minutes so he can be fresh for the playoffs. Hello? What better way to keep Fish fresh so that he can get in and knock down those miracle shots that ultimately validate him lol
User avatar
ChuckTaylors310
Junior
Posts: 259
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 05, 2008
Location: Inglewood, CA

Re: Farmar: Bench poison? 

Post#28 » by ChuckTaylors310 » Wed Apr 7, 2010 9:43 pm

Let Farmar walk and draft Jon Scheyer. 6'5 PG who can defend pretty well and shoot the 3. Problem solved
ƒï!ï!ïi¯i‾°δ‾‾Pך▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀)
User avatar
96 Til Infiniti
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,831
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 18, 2009

Re: Farmar: Bench poison? 

Post#29 » by 96 Til Infiniti » Wed Apr 7, 2010 11:35 pm

still holding out hope that by the time we're in the middle of the playoffs lamar will be back to the bench, luke will be in game shape again and then phil can shorten the rotation to...

lamar/luke/shannon/jordan. with jordan and shannon sharing minutes depending on whose s*cking less.

no more sasha or powell (he showed flashes last season in spot minutes, but has been terrible in his time this year), ever.

also as others have said, the bench will be cleared out next season. while we don't have the cap room to acquire great reserves, at this point seems like anything would be an upgrade.
Thank you, Phil.
User avatar
Anklebreaker702
RealGM
Posts: 13,946
And1: 164
Joined: Mar 29, 2008
Location: Las Vegas (2nd Home of the Lakers)
   

Re: Farmar: Bench poison? 

Post#30 » by Anklebreaker702 » Fri Apr 9, 2010 12:40 am

Magicontinues wrote:If they aren't going to keep him, they should have traded him this past deadline. Now he will walk away for nothing? Ridiculous move. Mitch certainly is not doing much with the little things lately, little tweaks to keep us on top.

What did Sasha say?

I'm pretty certain he's a restrictes free agent. I guess that is Mitch saying if you want to over pay for him you can have him, but if its within reason, we can match the offer.
VETERAN LAKER FAN

Return to Los Angeles Lakers