ImageImageImage

Humble Pistons Trade Proposal

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

GJense4181
Banned User
Posts: 9,627
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 30, 2004
Location: Ann Arbor

Humble Pistons Trade Proposal 

Post#1 » by GJense4181 » Sat Apr 17, 2010 10:18 pm

Rip+#7+#36 for Love and Gomes and Sessions? Love has a year then a TO and then a QO, Gomes has 2 years left before a PO. and Sessions is under contract for 3 more years.
Minnesota would have two lottery picks (#2 and #7 slots), the 16th, 36th, 45th, and 56th picks, 19.2 million in cap room (56.1-36.986194) i.e. a crack at a max free agent, and the option to re-sign Darko Milicic and/or pick up the QO on Nathan Jawai.

If you were to draft everybody that DraftExpress has in their mock, you'd be, prior to free agent signings:
Flynn/(Alexey Shved)
Hamilton/Ellington/(Xavier Henry)
Evan Turner/Brewer
Jefferson/(Ed Davis)/(Luke Harangody)
Milicic*/Hollins/(Artsiom Parakhouski)/Nathan Jawai*

Detroit is:
Stuckey/Sessions
Gordon/Daye
Prince/Gomes/Summers
Jerebko/Villanueva/Maxiell
Love/Wilcox
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: Humble Pistons Trade Proposal 

Post#2 » by revprodeji » Sat Apr 17, 2010 10:26 pm

Interesting idea, similar to the Jefferson for Prince+7th deals.

I think the difference in the deals kills this deal. Prince has a 1 year deal, Rip has a 3 year deal. Love is on his rookie contract, Jefferson is on his normal bigger deal.

The Al for Prince+7th is plausible, but I do not feel a Rip+pick for Love deal is even something we could consider.

If Love is moved, big if, but if he is moved it will be for a similar production and age prospect at the wing position.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
User avatar
Casperkid23
Pro Prospect
Posts: 780
And1: 6
Joined: Sep 20, 2008

Re: Humble Pistons Trade Proposal 

Post#3 » by Casperkid23 » Sat Apr 17, 2010 10:47 pm

GJense4181 wrote:Rip+#7+#36 for Love and Gomes and Sessions? Love has a year then a TO and then a QO, Gomes has 2 years left before a PO. and Sessions is under contract for 3 more years.
Minnesota would have two lottery picks (#2 and #7 slots), the 16th, 36th, 45th, and 56th picks, 19.2 million in cap room (56.1-36.986194) i.e. a crack at a max free agent, and the option to re-sign Darko Milicic and/or pick up the QO on Nathan Jawai.

If you were to draft everybody that DraftExpress has in their mock, you'd be, prior to free agent signings:
Flynn/(Alexey Shved)
Hamilton/Ellington/(Xavier Henry)
Evan Turner/Brewer
Jefferson/(Ed Davis)/(Luke Harangody)
Milicic*/Hollins/(Artsiom Parakhouski)/Nathan Jawai*

Detroit is:
Stuckey/Sessions
Gordon/Daye
Prince/Gomes/Summers
Jerebko/Villanueva/Maxiell
Love/Wilcox

For someone trying to sound knowledgeable, your cap IQ is lacking as is your ability to sweet talk a fan-base into a pretty bad deal.
NBA Draft Fanatic.
User avatar
Slum_Dillinger
Junior
Posts: 483
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 12, 2009

Re: Humble Pistons Trade Proposal 

Post#4 » by Slum_Dillinger » Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:03 pm

This is ugly bad for us. Hamilton is 32 and gets paid what, $35M over the next 3 years?
RE: Trading for Beasley
PeeDee wrote:Don't want him.

Strike one: Supercoolbeas
Strike two: He was supercoolrelieved when MN didn't get a top-2 pick.
Strike three: Been in supercoolrehab already.
coordinator0
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,311
And1: 1,383
Joined: Nov 11, 2008

Re: Humble Pistons Trade Proposal 

Post#5 » by coordinator0 » Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:05 pm

Casperkid23 wrote:For someone trying to sound knowledgeable, your cap IQ is lacking as is your ability to sweet talk a fan-base into a pretty bad deal.


Hamilton makes an even 12.5 mil. next season, while the added salaries of Love, Sessions, and Gomes comes out over $11,862,600. I'm not sure if that would work under the the trade rules, but it seems pretty close.

I don't really like this deal for the Wolves either, IMO the only deal that's really plausible is something like our lottery pick (if we don't move into the top 3) and Prince for Jefferson. Even then IDK if it's enough from the Pistons end.
User avatar
Casperkid23
Pro Prospect
Posts: 780
And1: 6
Joined: Sep 20, 2008

Re: Humble Pistons Trade Proposal 

Post#6 » by Casperkid23 » Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:07 pm

coordinator0 wrote:
Casperkid23 wrote:For someone trying to sound knowledgeable, your cap IQ is lacking as is your ability to sweet talk a fan-base into a pretty bad deal.


Hamilton makes an even 12.5 mil. next season, while the added salaries of Love, Sessions, and Gomes comes out over $11,862,600. I'm not sure if that would work under the the trade rules, but it seems pretty close.

I don't really like this deal for the Wolves either, IMO the only deal that's really plausible is something like our lottery pick (if we don't move into the top 3) and Prince for Jefferson. Even then IDK if it's enough from the Pistons end.

19.2 cap room is what I am talking about as far as the cap IQ.
NBA Draft Fanatic.
User avatar
The J Rocka
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,570
And1: 1,732
Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Location: Minneapolis
   

Re: Humble Pistons Trade Proposal 

Post#7 » by The J Rocka » Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:13 pm

Prince + 7th pick or no dice.
GJense4181
Banned User
Posts: 9,627
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 30, 2004
Location: Ann Arbor

Re: Humble Pistons Trade Proposal 

Post#8 » by GJense4181 » Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:20 pm

Casperkid23 wrote:
coordinator0 wrote:
Casperkid23 wrote:For someone trying to sound knowledgeable, your cap IQ is lacking as is your ability to sweet talk a fan-base into a pretty bad deal.


Hamilton makes an even 12.5 mil. next season, while the added salaries of Love, Sessions, and Gomes comes out over $11,862,600. I'm not sure if that would work under the the trade rules, but it seems pretty close.

I don't really like this deal for the Wolves either, IMO the only deal that's really plausible is something like our lottery pick (if we don't move into the top 3) and Prince for Jefferson. Even then IDK if it's enough from the Pistons end.

19.2 cap room is what I am talking about as far as the cap IQ.

I acknowledge that I did not factor in cap holds for Milicic/Jawai and the draft picks, but even if I committed a typo/mathematical error/misguidedly trusted hoophype's salary information, I don't think you have any right to question any aspect of my IQ.
GJense4181
Banned User
Posts: 9,627
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 30, 2004
Location: Ann Arbor

Re: Humble Pistons Trade Proposal 

Post#9 » by GJense4181 » Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:21 pm

coordinator0 wrote:
Casperkid23 wrote:For someone trying to sound knowledgeable, your cap IQ is lacking as is your ability to sweet talk a fan-base into a pretty bad deal.


Hamilton makes an even 12.5 mil. next season, while the added salaries of Love, Sessions, and Gomes comes out over $11,862,600. I'm not sure if that would work under the the trade rules, but it seems pretty close.

I don't really like this deal for the Wolves either, IMO the only deal that's really plausible is something like our lottery pick (if we don't move into the top 3) and Prince for Jefferson. Even then IDK if it's enough from the Pistons end.

It did. I should have posted the trade ID.
GJense4181
Banned User
Posts: 9,627
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 30, 2004
Location: Ann Arbor

Re: Humble Pistons Trade Proposal 

Post#10 » by GJense4181 » Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:23 pm

Casperkid23 wrote:
GJense4181 wrote:Rip+#7+#36 for Love and Gomes and Sessions? Love has a year then a TO and then a QO, Gomes has 2 years left before a PO. and Sessions is under contract for 3 more years.
Minnesota would have two lottery picks (#2 and #7 slots), the 16th, 36th, 45th, and 56th picks, 19.2 million in cap room (56.1-36.986194) i.e. a crack at a max free agent, and the option to re-sign Darko Milicic and/or pick up the QO on Nathan Jawai.

If you were to draft everybody that DraftExpress has in their mock, you'd be, prior to free agent signings:
Flynn/(Alexey Shved)
Hamilton/Ellington/(Xavier Henry)
Evan Turner/Brewer
Jefferson/(Ed Davis)/(Luke Harangody)
Milicic*/Hollins/(Artsiom Parakhouski)/Nathan Jawai*

Detroit is:
Stuckey/Sessions
Gordon/Daye
Prince/Gomes/Summers
Jerebko/Villanueva/Maxiell
Love/Wilcox

For someone trying to sound knowledgeable, your cap IQ is lacking as is your ability to sweet talk a fan-base into a pretty bad deal.

I did not attempt any sweet-talking. I presented an offer that works under the trade checker and detailed the assets that would remain after the trade. I'm not going to kiss your e-ass so you'll like my trade proposal. I was attempting a different take on Prince+7 for Jefferson, and that's all.
User avatar
Slum_Dillinger
Junior
Posts: 483
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 12, 2009

Re: Humble Pistons Trade Proposal 

Post#11 » by Slum_Dillinger » Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:39 pm

The point of the Prince + 7 for Jefferson deal for us is to take a guy on a bigger contract (Jefferson) who doesn't fit with the younger, cheaper, potentially better system fit at the same position (Love) and swing him for a versatile, veteran wing who expires in a year (Prince) while adding a top 10 pick.

This trade is backwards. We take on more salary, get older and give up a guy we really like, a guy who's contract isnt guaranteed, and a steady back up PG that most wish would get more PT or even start.
RE: Trading for Beasley
PeeDee wrote:Don't want him.

Strike one: Supercoolbeas
Strike two: He was supercoolrelieved when MN didn't get a top-2 pick.
Strike three: Been in supercoolrehab already.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,756
And1: 22,334
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Humble Pistons Trade Proposal 

Post#12 » by Klomp » Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:46 pm

revprodeji wrote:If Love is moved, big if, but if he is moved it will be for a similar production and age prospect at the wing position.


Hmmm, I wonder who this would include. Off the top of my head I can think of:

Anthony Randolph (if viewed as a SF)
Thaddeus Young
Wilson Chandler
Danilo Gallinari
James Harden

Any of those guys interest us? Anyone I'm leaving off?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Humble Pistons Trade Proposal 

Post#13 » by Krapinsky » Sun Apr 18, 2010 12:17 am

Klomp wrote:
revprodeji wrote:If Love is moved, big if, but if he is moved it will be for a similar production and age prospect at the wing position.


Hmmm, I wonder who this would include. Off the top of my head I can think of:

Anthony Randolph (if viewed as a SF)
Thaddeus Young
Wilson Chandler
Danilo Gallinari
James Harden

Any of those guys interest us? Anyone I'm leaving off?


Jeff Green, Wes Johnson, Aminu all seem more likely.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
GJense4181
Banned User
Posts: 9,627
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 30, 2004
Location: Ann Arbor

Re: Humble Pistons Trade Proposal 

Post#14 » by GJense4181 » Sun Apr 18, 2010 12:20 am

Would you do the deal with any of the following additions?
Hamilton, #7, and Austin Daye OR Rodney Stuckey OR Jonas Jerebko for Love/Gomes/Sessions?
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: Humble Pistons Trade Proposal 

Post#15 » by revprodeji » Sun Apr 18, 2010 12:20 am

Klomp, do not look into it. Just speaking logic.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,756
And1: 22,334
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Humble Pistons Trade Proposal 

Post#16 » by Klomp » Sun Apr 18, 2010 12:35 am

revprodeji wrote:Klomp, do not look into it. Just speaking logic.


Sorry. You know me, I know nothing about logic.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: Humble Pistons Trade Proposal 

Post#17 » by revprodeji » Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:00 am

GJense4181 wrote:Would you do the deal with any of the following additions?
Hamilton, #7, and Austin Daye OR Rodney Stuckey OR Jonas Jerebko for Love/Gomes/Sessions?


No the foundation of your trade is bad. The core is bad. wrapping a pretty little bow on it will not help.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Humble Pistons Trade Proposal 

Post#18 » by shangrila » Sun Apr 18, 2010 2:26 am

I know this is off topic, but if the team misses out on Turner and a Love for Harden based deal is on the table I'd probably take it. Seems like one of the best fits for the Triangle in the league.
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: Humble Pistons Trade Proposal 

Post#19 » by revprodeji » Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:36 am

James Harden?

I think he has the skill set, I could get into that idea. Much more then the Love for Green ideas. I do feel that Love carries greater "value" then Harden does, but that could be homer goggles. Perhaps if OKC attached a little extra.

I was a big fan of Harden last year and think that would be a nice follow up plan if we get the 3rd pick. Favors would be a defensive help with this team and both of those players "fit" with Rubio and the system.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,756
And1: 22,334
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Humble Pistons Trade Proposal 

Post#20 » by Klomp » Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:39 am

Harden seems like too much of a role player for my liking.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves