Ripp wrote:dagger wrote:Ripp wrote:Why is then unreasonable to to suggest he would not want Bargnani at 5 years 50 mil, when David Andersen is doing a similar job for 2.5 mil? .
You might as well put a sign on your back that says kick me.
Bargnani and Anderson are similar in the way a Porsche is to a Ford Focus. They are both cars, and one is a lot cheaper. It's like saying that DeMar is like Wade, only costs us $14 million less. What a bargain!
Bargnani is five years younger and beats Anderson in almost every category
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/p ... yerId=4205
Your analogy is flawed, because I think Morey would view both Andersen and Bargnani as stopgaps. To continue with your analogy, my BMW (Yao) in in the shop, and I need a rental. I can either rent the Ford Focus (Andersen) or the Porsche (Bargs). Since Morey is a cheapskate (like any good GM should be), he is going for the Focus.
In any case, adjusted on a per 36 minute basis:Code: Select all
Season Age Tm G GS MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
2009-10 24 TOR 80 80 2799 6.9 14.7 .470 1.6 4.2 .372 2.3 3.0 .774 1.4 5.0 6.3 1.2 0.3 1.4 1.5 2.8 17.7
2009-10 29 HOU 63 0 891 5.9 13.7 .432 1.1 3.2 .346 1.9 2.7 .687 2.2 6.2 8.4 1.8 0.6 0.5 1.5 4.8 14.8
The playing field becomes more level. Andersen less efficient, Bargnani a far inferior rebounder.
I love when you made fun of dagger for using fg%, not TS%.
According to you, Bosh ts% and bargnani ts% is huge. "Andersen less efficient" is a big understatement. Their difference is bigger than between bosh and bargnani.
edit:grammar




















