Rerisen wrote:
I heard the side of the story the Bulls and Paxson supported at the PC.
No you didn't. You heard an apology from Pax for his involvement in the issue. You heard no details. We've been over this.
Rerisen wrote:I've said many times I don't care if Vinny shared blame or not, because its not relevant to the perception of the event that has been created.
But you don't know what the perception is since it's been addressed.
Rerisen wrote:Sure we do. Van Gundy discussed the incident post-apology and still echoed the same opinions he originally voiced.
We went over this and in that same interview he voiced a number of positives about the organization. You dismiss those because they don't support your argument.
Rerisen wrote:Perception is Jeff Van Gundy may not be considered for the job because of his comments. Evidence for? Jeff Van Gundy’s own comments!
That's not relevant to this conversation and may not even be true.
Rerisen wrote:I don’t know how much more I can do, maybe put flashing arrows pointing to his words? If you refuse to see the obvious possibility that Jeff just alluded to, and very well seems to think is the reason he wouldn’t be considered.
No need, since none of this is relevant to our discussion. It has nothing to do with the altercation or the general perception of the organization.
Rerisen wrote:I just told you my central point. There you go putting words in my mouth again.
I'm going over the history of the conversation. Just because you now say your central point is that there's a possibility this could be bad, doesn't dismiss all that went on before in this thread.
Rerisen wrote:If Paxson were to be fired, I think there is far less chance the incident would have a chance to hurt the organizations reputation going forward. That's is called making an observation.
A bad one and one I disagree with.
Rerisen wrote:I did read that part and I'm fine with it being main place we differ. Unfortunately I have to clear up all these other misconceptions you keep alluding to.
I'm not alluding to anything. I'm pointing out the positions you've taken in this thread.
Rerisen wrote:You are 'winning' having an opinion?

Yeah, lol. Or to be more exact, I'm doing a better job of supporting my position or as it it known in this part of the world, winning the argument.
Do you know where you're going to spend eternity? You're going to spend it with me, talking about Jesus Christ.