SportsFan215 wrote:What would it take to acquire T-Will? I really like his game, and I think he would fit in really well at SF for the Clippers if we don't get a big name FA.
How does #8 for T-Will/2012 GSW First sound?
Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO
SportsFan215 wrote:What would it take to acquire T-Will? I really like his game, and I think he would fit in really well at SF for the Clippers if we don't get a big name FA.
SportsFan215 wrote:SportsFan215 wrote:What would it take to acquire T-Will? I really like his game, and I think he would fit in really well at SF for the Clippers if we don't get a big name FA.
How does #8 for T-Will/2012 GSW First sound?


Still, allow me two making-a-splash predictions for this summer. The first: MRMC pounces on Phil Jackson with an absolutely unfathomable offer. How unfathomable? Five years, $85 million. Yeah. That's what I mean. Prokhorov is already on record as saying that he wants an NBA coach. Why not overpay to get one of the greatest ever? How could the Lakers possibly come close to matching that commitment? And why would Jackson say no to finishing his career in the New York area for the most lucrative coaching deal ever BY FAR? I say the Godfather offer gets made, and I say Jackson takes it.
Second, instead of chewing up Jersey's cap space with overpaid free agents, I bet Prokhorov trades for Andrei Kirilenko -- his former CSKA star, as well as an expiring 2011 contract of $17.82 million -- in a deal that won't cost Jersey anything because Utah (struggling to find money for Carlos Boozer) could easily replace Kirilenko with its lottery pick (No. 8 overall) and a second trade. For the Nets, even if they just rented Kirilenko and picked Georgia Tech's Derrick Favors (the draft's best power forward) at No. 3, that's an intriguing short-term front line (Favors, Kirilenko and Brook Lopez) and they'd maintain flexibility for a run at Carmelo in 2011 and/or have Kirilenko's expiring deal to shop this February. And it would go over big back home for Prokhorov. Win, win and win.

Preludepunk27 wrote:SportsFan215 wrote:SportsFan215 wrote:What would it take to acquire T-Will? I really like his game, and I think he would fit in really well at SF for the Clippers if we don't get a big name FA.
How does #8 for T-Will/2012 GSW First sound?
That's not worth it to the Nets. With us having the 3rd pick, I don't see ANYONE available at 8 that I would trade Twill and a future 1st for. That would be an absolute steal for you.
My advice to you is trade up a few spots and take Aminou. He'll be solid on the Warriors.
Jersey Generals wrote:I tell you, every day that goes by, I'm more and more excited about the Kirilenko idea that both you and Demens, and now Bill Simmons, has thrown out. It makes a lot of sense.

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
vincecarter4pres wrote:I don't mind it, but I want the 9th overall pick for absorbing him. Yes he's a very solid player, but he's incredibly injury prone and enormously overpaid. You don't just absorb contracts like that for no incentive in today's NBA, it's that simple.
I'd do Courtney Lee and maybe CDR and pure cap space for AK47 and the 9th.
I dont know if Utah can pass that up if they are really serious about keeping Boozer, resigning Korver and Fesenko and matching offers for Wesley Matthews.
They get a really solid two guard on a rookie deal and a one year look at CDR, along with the other obvious monetary incentive to do the deal. I mean after the Knicks/Rockets deal, it almost looks like an overpay sending out Lee, even if he is just an OK player, but I would still do it as long as my guy is there at 9, although knowing Thorn, he'd blow the pick and pass on who I'm thinking of...

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Jersey Generals wrote:I think Lee would be overpaying, yes, but not a lesser asset like CDR or even a second round pick or something.

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.


Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.