Rank our possible post players

[Breakdown777]

I think everyone has a different opinion of who we should keep and who we should let go. I know who we should keep depends on some various factors, but I think now might be a good time to get a concise look at how we rate our bigs/possible bigs for trades, values, and percieved chemistry.
I'm going assume our big situation will be: Al, Love, Hollins, Stemsia, Pek, Cousins, Darko. Obviously we want a 3 man rotation, and we have 5 "main" bigs.

Should we do this mock draft style, or just have each poster rank importance? I think mock draft works for overall board view. Lets say first to 10 votes, then move on. A description would be nice but not necessary.

1. Al (1)

I'm going Al even though he doesn't mesh perfectly with what I think the team outlook is. His offensive game is too good to give up, he could improve next year after an offseason of rest, and I don't think we'd get fair value in a trade.

[dunkonu21]

Al (2)

He has the most valuable skill, post scoring. Has increased his shot blocking every year (if you take into account he couldn't jump most of last year). He will be 100% this year.

[cpfsf]

In terms of value or skill?

[mandurugo]

Al (2), Darko (1)

Darko's not the best, but he's the biggest. And the best on defense. So he's kind of the best.

[Krapinsky]

Al (2), Darko (1)

Darko's not the best, but he's the biggest. And the best on defense. So he's kind of the best.

Al (2), Darko (1), Cousins (1)

[southern wolf]

Al (2), Darko (1), Cousins (1), Love (1)

I think Love has the most value around the league, a hell of a lot of potential, and room to improve. Not that the others don't.

[Esohny]

Al (2), Darko (1), Cousins (2), Love (1)

[cpfsf]

Al (2), Darko (1), Cousins (2), Love (2)

Can we make it best of 10 or something instead of first to 10? I don't think this is working too well.

[Klomp]

Can we make it best of 10 or something instead of first to 10? I don't think this is working too well.

I'll make it easier

Al (2), Darko (2), Cousins (2), Love (2)

[revprodeji]

(I am a lil worried because Memphis said once he got his contract he slumped)

Al (2), Darko (3), Cousins (2), Love (2)

[Krapinsky]

The Darko votes are perplexing. Does that mean he should be paid more than Al?

[horaceworthy]

Al (2), Darko (3), Cousins (3), Love (2)

Really the #4 pick in general, not just Cousins.

[hijacktheparade]

Al (2), Darko (3), Cousins (3), Love (3)

[revprodeji]

The Darko votes are perplexing. Does that mean he should be paid more than Al?

As much as I love the pure artwork of Al in the post, I value defense and passing much more. Darko brings those better then Al.

I think Darko is a very good #2 big. Put a true #1 next to him that can hustle, defend and score and he will be a good piece.

[Krapinsky]

The Darko votes are perplexing. Does that mean he should be paid more than Al?

As much as I love the pure artwork of Al in the post, I value defense and passing much more. Darko brings those better then Al.

I think Darko is a very good #2 big. Put a true #1 next to him that can hustle, defend and score and he will be a good piece.

Now I am curious. If you are a GM and you had $10M/yr to sign either player, you would rather spend that $10M on Darko?

[revprodeji]

I do not think any of them have proven it.

[Krapinsky]

I do not think any of them have proven it.

Okay. Then in your opinion Al is not worth $10M/year and is thus overpaid $3M/year.

What about at $6M/year. Same question, you would rather have Darko than Al at $6M/yr?

[Krapinsky]

Any other Darko voters care to explain this. I'm just trying to understand y'all

[Klomp]

Any other Darko voters care to explain this. I'm just trying to understand y'all

Size. Defense. Passing. Need I continue?

[The J Rocka]

Big Al (3)