IND "We're all hoping #10 for #16 + #23"
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: IND "We're all hoping #10 for #16 + #23"
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,971
- And1: 2,385
- Joined: May 20, 2009
-
Re: IND "We're all hoping #10 for #16 + #23"
I'm getting kind of worried that George won't be there at #16(I think it's basically given he won't be), and I'm wondering if the Clippers are thinking about him at 8, I'm hoping that they like Henry more then George.
Re: IND "We're all hoping #10 for #16 + #23"
- collin_k41
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,470
- And1: 1
- Joined: Mar 12, 2006
Re: IND "We're all hoping #10 for #16 + #23"
These are the kinds of deals I suggested a while back but I didn't get much response. Pretty much, we have a lot of picks, it's a deep draft, we probably shouldn't be adding 3 1st rounders to our team, so let's package them to move up. I realize that this rarely happens but being that it's such a deep draft, there are teams who would for sure take our 23 and 16 for their (higher)pick. I don't really care if there are "decent" players at 23 and 16. Quality over quantity. We don't need a bunch more fringe starters on our team. If these kinds of deals are available Kahn had better pull the dang trigger.
Re: IND "We're all hoping #10 for #16 + #23"
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,971
- And1: 2,385
- Joined: May 20, 2009
-
Re: IND "We're all hoping #10 for #16 + #23"
collin_k41 wrote:These are the kinds of deals I suggested a while back but I didn't get much response. Pretty much, we have a lot of picks, it's a deep draft, we probably shouldn't be adding 3 1st rounders to our team, so let's package them to move up. I realize that this rarely happens but being that it's such a deep draft, there are teams who would for sure take our 23 and 16 for their (higher)pick. I don't really care if there are "decent" players at 23 and 16. Quality over quantity. We don't need a bunch more fringe starters on our team. If these kinds of deals are available Kahn had better pull the dang trigger.
exactly. We don't need players who may be good, we need guys who may be superstars and there's a better chance of getting one at 10 then at 16(George may be one, but he won't be there at 16 if he keeps impressing.)
Re: IND "We're all hoping #10 for #16 + #23"
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,834
- And1: 1,126
- Joined: Apr 10, 2008
- Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
-
Re: IND "We're all hoping #10 for #16 + #23"
funkatron101 wrote:Child of Wonder wrote:I'd say do it.
Then move Jefferson, #10 to Philly for Brand, #2
I think we gotta give up on the idea of grabbing the #2.
How about this wacky idea?
#16 + #23 for #10
Same ol Al for Prince + #7
Then Prince + #10 for Iggy.
Is that doable?
I was thinking the same thing myself earlier. Great minds think alike, but you call that a wacky idea? I'm bored, so I'm just going to trade everybody. I can't quite figure out where to ship Ellington though.
MIN IN: #5 + Kapono + Ellis + 14 + Conley + Lowry + 3 million
MIN OUT: A.Jefferson + #16 + #23+ Flynn + Sessions + Brewer + Love + Pekovic + Gomes
DET IN A.Jefferson
DET OUT #7 Prince
SAC IN: #7 #16
SAC OUT: #5
PHI IN: R.Jefferson + #10 + Fernandez
PHI OUT: Kapono + Iguodala
IND IN: Flynn
IND OUT: #10
SA IN: Prince
SA OUT: R.Jefferson + 3 Million + #20
GSW IN: Iguodala
GSW OUT: Ellis
HOU IN: Pekovic + #23 Brewer
HOU OUT: #14 Lowry
POR IN: Gomes
POR OUT: Fernandez
NJ IN: Love + #20
NJ OUT: #3
MIL IN: Sessions
MIL OUT: Conley

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
Re: IND "We're all hoping #10 for #16 + #23"
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: IND "We're all hoping #10 for #16 + #23"
That just gave me a headache. And I only made it to NJ.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: IND "We're all hoping #10 for #16 + #23"
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,002
- And1: 6,019
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: IND "We're all hoping #10 for #16 + #23"
shrink wrote:SeattleJazzFan wrote:I'll see Indy's 10 and raise it to #9.
Yes, I'd give you guys the Jazz' #9 for 16 and 23.
LOL! Its like the "Name That Tune" show down! Deal.
now, can the Clippers name that tune in 8 notes

Re: IND "We're all hoping #10 for #16 + #23"
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,292
- And1: 19,304
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: IND "We're all hoping #10 for #16 + #23"
SeattleJazzFan wrote:I'll see Indy's 10 and raise it to #9.
Yes, I'd give you guys the Jazz' #9 for 16 and 23.
It looks like Jazz fans aren't down with this:
viewtopic.php?f=33&t=1012050&view=unread#unread
Thanks sendaii and funkatron
Re: IND "We're all hoping #10 for #16 + #23"
- horaceworthy
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,650
- And1: 250
- Joined: Jan 17, 2006
- Location: Ruining Fuddrucker's for everyone
Re: IND "We're all hoping #10 for #16 + #23"
I think trading #16 and #23 for #10 would be silly. Players will drop, and we could survive having three rookies on the team.
People are putting too many eggs in the George basket. This is a good, deep draft and there will be talent available at both #16 and #23.
People are putting too many eggs in the George basket. This is a good, deep draft and there will be talent available at both #16 and #23.
"A while back,'' Cardinal said, "I took a picture of the standings and texted it to Love, just to bust his chops,'' Cardinal said. "He sent me a picture back of a snowdrift.''
Re: IND "We're all hoping #10 for #16 + #23"
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,511
- And1: 6,584
- Joined: Dec 21, 2009
- Location: Land of Aus
-
Re: IND "We're all hoping #10 for #16 + #23"
I don't think the team stays at 4, 16 and 23 though. What I'd hope is they trade up from 23 with something like Pekovic to end up with a Cousins, Henry and Babbitt/James/Hayward draft
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves