Poster rating system

[darealslimshady]

Does anybody else think that this website should have some sort of rating system where users rate other users based on post quality. I think that would be pretty cool.

[LittleOzzy]

I'm giving this thread a minus 10

[DelaneyRudd]

Another thing for people to whine about? No thank you.

[wetsthebed]

That's a crappy gimmick that small forums use, it wouldn't work here and would cause too many problems.

[WarFan]

Critic's afraid of criticism.

[darealslimshady]

Hmm I can understand some of the negative aspects of having this feature, but I think you are all ignoring the positive things that it could bring to the table. It would make this forum a lot more lively.

[HMFFL]

The poster rating system is a fail to me, but a rating system for articles can be useful.

[True Warrior Zo]

The poster rating system is a fail to me, but a rating system for articles can be useful.

+ 1 for poster rating, -1 for articles.

: you are stuck at zero

[Dry_Fish]

I keep my own rating system.

darealslimshady -23
LittleOzzy + 2
DelaneyRudd -4
wetsthebed +16
EndOfArgument +10
HMFFL +12
True Warrior Zo -1

[Yuri Vaultin]

Does anybody else think that this website should have some sort of rating system where users rate other users based on post quality. I think that would be pretty cool.

This would be bad.

Posters could write insightful and articulate posts rife with quality only to get voted badly because the wteens on this site didn't agree with it. Of course, some douchebag writes "+1. IBTL" and he'll get high praise from the same group of people.

Quality, sadly is subjective and people will base quality on whether or not the post coincides with their beliefs and opinions.

[darealslimshady]

I keep my own rating system.

darealslimshady -23
LittleOzzy + 2
DelaneyRudd -4
wetsthebed +16
EndOfArgument +10
HMFFL +12
True Warrior Zo -1

darealslimshady +23
Little Ozzy -2
DelaneyRudd +4
wetsthebed -16
EndOfArgument -10
HMFFL -12
True Warrior Zo +1

[darealslimshady]

Does anybody else think that this website should have some sort of rating system where users rate other users based on post quality. I think that would be pretty cool.

This would be bad.

Posters could write insightful and articulate posts rife with quality only to get voted badly because the wteens on this site didn't agree with it. Of course, some douchebag writes "+1. IBTL" and he'll get high praise from the same group of people.

Quality, sadly is subjective and people will base quality on whether or not the post coincides with their beliefs and opinions.

I do not agree. Maybe other people may behave like this, but I know that I can respect other peoples opinion that are well thought out, and I don't think I am the only one who thinks like this.

[fudgie]

Does anybody else think that this website should have some sort of rating system where users rate other users based on post quality. I think that would be pretty cool.

I demand realGM implement this system so that I can show my disapproval of this post.

[LLcoleJ]

Does anybody else think that this website should have some sort of rating system where users rate other users based on post quality. I think that would be pretty cool.

This would be bad.

Posters could write insightful and articulate posts rife with quality only to get voted badly because the wteens on this site didn't agree with it. Of course, some douchebag writes "+1. IBTL" and he'll get high praise from the same group of people.

Quality, sadly is subjective and people will base quality on whether or not the post coincides with their beliefs and opinions.

I do not agree. Maybe other people may behave like this, but I know that I can respect other peoples opinion that are well thought out, and I don't think I am the only one who thinks like this.

maybe you should post here longer than 3 days to gauge posters from this site

[wetsthebed]

I keep my own rating system.

darealslimshady -23
LittleOzzy + 2
DelaneyRudd -4
wetsthebed +16
EndOfArgument +10
HMFFL +12
True Warrior Zo -1

Dry_Fish +100

[Yuri Vaultin]

This would be bad.

Posters could write insightful and articulate posts rife with quality only to get voted badly because the wteens on this site didn't agree with it. Of course, some douchebag writes "+1. IBTL" and he'll get high praise from the same group of people.

Quality, sadly is subjective and people will base quality on whether or not the post coincides with their beliefs and opinions.

I do not agree. Maybe other people may behave like this, but I know that I can respect other peoples opinion that are well thought out, and I don't think I am the only one who thinks like this.

maybe you should post here longer than 3 days to gauge posters from this site

I believe a "ZING!" and a e-high five is in order for this post Phil.

[HMFFL]

I keep my own rating system.

darealslimshady -23
LittleOzzy + 2
DelaneyRudd -4
wetsthebed +16
EndOfArgument +10
HMFFL +12
True Warrior Zo -1

Dry_Fish +100

Dry_Fish is the man.

I have no problem being second to someone who wetsthebed.

[Rasho Brezec]

Rooster -666

[True Warrior Zo]

darealslimshady +23
Little Ozzy -2
DelaneyRudd +4
wetsthebed -16
EndOfArgument -10
HMFFL -12
True Warrior Zo +1

Racist mods trying to keep me down.

there was finally a poster breaking out of oppression to +1 me in support of my struggle and you ban him. One day the fly will revolt....and I wouldn't want to be Yuri then!



edit----- Mags, you have the same code for 2 of the smilies. When you open "view more smilies", the icon between and shows up as . HOWEVER (think screamin a smith) there is also an icon between and that looks like this . They show up the same but the icons are different.

I would like to use the first option and start calling it my own. Please fix. You can even call it :twz:

[True Warrior Zo]

Burnt-out
Under
Modding
Posters

I was serious.