ImageImageImage

Tyson Chandler

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
TrentTuckerForever
Starter
Posts: 2,100
And1: 2
Joined: Aug 23, 2001
Location: St. Paul

Re: Tyson Chandler 

Post#21 » by TrentTuckerForever » Sat Jun 12, 2010 3:30 pm

Klomp wrote:So you're judging him based on the fact he might not fit into an offense we run only 20% of the time?


I'm not a big enough stats dork to break this down completely (currently only hold the rank of "Dork In Training.") However, I'll take a stab at it:

1) I don't think anyone is dreaming of the 7 points/7 rebounds, 50 games per year Chandler we've seen the last two years. So I'm assuming we'd want the double-double machine that played in New Orleans with Chris Paul in 06-07 and 07-08.

2) In those two years New Orleans ranked 23rd and 26th in pace, according to Basketball Reference. Despite the fact that they had Chris Paul at his absolute pinnacle, the Hornets were not a running team.

3) So extrapolating from that (and again, someone could do an awesome Synergy study here), I'm going to say that most of Chandler's opportunities were in the halfcourt, not in transition. That's what I remember subjectively - Chandler playing pick and roll with Paul and slicing people up.

4) Even if Rubio arrives at training camp in 2011 as planned, he will not be at the level Paul played at from 06-08.

So based on all that I think it's fair to assume that Chandler, if he were to come here, would need to be able to rely on the offense to get points. In New Orleans when Chandler was successful in the past, the offense was Chris Paul in pick and roll situations. The triangle (and the Wolves' stated preference for an uptempo style) couldn't be more different than that approach.
Klomp wrote:Didn't Brad Miller back up Vlade Divac in SAC too?
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,771
And1: 22,352
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Tyson Chandler 

Post#22 » by Klomp » Sat Jun 12, 2010 3:39 pm

Yes, but offense is only 50% of the game. What about all the things he could bring defensively?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: Tyson Chandler 

Post#23 » by Devilzsidewalk » Sat Jun 12, 2010 4:23 pm

if they want to work a sign and trade of Jefferson/Brewer for Chandler/Wallace or something like that, then cool, but signing Chandler alone with the intention of rebuilding your frontcourt around him is mental
Image
User avatar
TrentTuckerForever
Starter
Posts: 2,100
And1: 2
Joined: Aug 23, 2001
Location: St. Paul

Re: Tyson Chandler 

Post#24 » by TrentTuckerForever » Sat Jun 12, 2010 4:44 pm

Klomp wrote:Yes, but offense is only 50% of the game. What about all the things he could bring defensively?


No different than the things Milicic could bring, at half the price IMO.
Klomp wrote:Didn't Brad Miller back up Vlade Divac in SAC too?
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,771
And1: 22,352
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Tyson Chandler 

Post#25 » by Klomp » Sat Jun 12, 2010 4:49 pm

If we are building our team, using the Lakers as an example, I could see Milicic as our Pau and Chandler as our Bynum. I know, I know, Milicic isn't near the level of Gasol............yet.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: Tyson Chandler 

Post#26 » by Devilzsidewalk » Sat Jun 12, 2010 5:36 pm

Cousins/Love seems way closer to Bynum/Gasol to me. And if you want to put Randolph in that Odom role, then there you go. Kinda hard to get that Kobe part filled though
Image
User avatar
AQuintus
RealGM
Posts: 10,425
And1: 2,458
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
   

Re: Tyson Chandler 

Post#27 » by AQuintus » Sat Jun 12, 2010 5:57 pm

Klomp wrote:If we are building our team, using the Lakers as an example, I could see Milicic as our Pau and Chandler as our Bynum. I know, I know, Milicic isn't near the level of Gasol............yet.


Chandler is nothing at all like Bynum, though.
Image

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves