ImageImageImage

MIN - PHI - SAC

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

MIN - PHI - SAC 

Post#1 » by shrink » Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:13 pm

This is the deal I'd like to see:

SAC GIVES: #5 + Nocioni
SAC GETS: Jefferson + 23

PHI GIVES: 2 + Dalembert
PHI GETS: 4 + 16 + Nocioni + $7 mil in cap space

MIN GIVES: 4 + 16 + 23 + Jefferson
MIN GETS: 2 + 5 + Dalembert


SAC: This is the deal that has been considered to be roughly fair. There are people on both sides that question it, but it makes sense because of the individual value. At #5, if Cousins is gone, SAC is forced to add another SF in Wes Johnson, or to go with their personal favorite Monroe. Neither are good value for the Kings at #5, and are unlikely to be as good as Al. Jefferson is already a proven performer, and they get a chance to buy him low. They move an unhappy Nocioni that isn't worth his contract, and use the cap space to add another pick late in the 1st.

PHI: PHI gets its two picks, and gets under the lux. Whether you love cousins or hate him, he has tremendous upside. People question whether Turner and Iguodala can play together, and that would not be an issue for DMC or Favors if he drops (NJN may pick cousins if they think they will bring in one of the many elite PF FA's. The $7 mil cap space help is key here, and saves the Philly about $13-14 mil. Using Dalembert's over-priced deal creates minutes for Cousins.

MIN uses Al and all its picks to get the pair of players that best fit a future with Rubio. The #2 and #5 have more value to MIN than the other teams in the neighborhood because of their fit, and by paying all their assets, they come out of the draft with their team of the future. Perhaps they could swing a Love + Pekovic to NJN for #3 as well, if they want to go super-young.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: MIN - PHI - SAC 

Post#2 » by shrink » Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:28 pm

If SAC doesn't want Al and is set on trading down for Monroe, spinning this through DET works too.

SAC GIVES: 5 + Nocioni
SAC GETS: 7 + 23 + Dalembert

PHI GIVES: 2 + Dalembert
PHI GETS: 4 + 16 + Nocioni + $7 mil in cap space

MIN GIVES: 4 + 16 + 23 + Jefferson
MIN GETS: 2 + 5 + Prince

DET GIVES: 7 + Prince
DET GETS: Jefferson


DET and PHI get the same deal.

SAC trades down but still gets the same player, adds Dalembert who is a better fit and expiring, and adds a late 1st.

MIN doesn't mind getting Prince or Dalembert.
Winter Wonder
Rookie
Posts: 1,198
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2008
       

Re: MIN - PHI - SAC 

Post#3 » by Winter Wonder » Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:28 pm

Would absolutely do this deal from MN side. Consolidates assets into better assets (quantity into quality, not that the assets we are trading are bad, just making them better). It, likely, helps balance the roster. I think the value is great, I just don't know if this is what the other teams want. I am guessing the fans of Phi and Sac will complain due to the exact assets they are attaining, but valuewise, it looks pretty solid.

An easy, easy yes for me for MN
User avatar
IAmTheTruth
Junior
Posts: 313
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 28, 2010
Location: Minnesota

Re: MIN - PHI - SAC 

Post#4 » by IAmTheTruth » Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:31 pm

holy s**t Turner AND Johnson???


I can't pull the trigger fast enough
Don't ban me
User avatar
The J Rocka
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,570
And1: 1,732
Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Location: Minneapolis
   

Re: MIN - PHI - SAC 

Post#5 » by The J Rocka » Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:32 pm

Awesome. I had a trade like this envisioned (2nd pick or Iggy) but Shrink put the touch on it. That's as fair as it's gonna get with equal value. Now do we go Turner + Johnson, Turner + Monroe, Favors + Johnson?
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,827
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: MIN - PHI - SAC 

Post#6 » by C.lupus » Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:36 pm

Heck yeah, I'd do it.
lewdog
Rookie
Posts: 1,162
And1: 94
Joined: Jun 21, 2005

Re: MIN - PHI - SAC 

Post#7 » by lewdog » Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:35 pm

Outstanding trade for us! I think we would all jump in with both feet on this one.

As enticing as the 7 mil cap space and the draft picks, not sure if Phila. does it without them ridding themselves of Brand. I use to live in Philly and the PR hit (by not selecting #2) might be too much for management to bare. We’re talking assassination.
Qui me amat, amet et canem meum
Bring Back 1983
Sophomore
Posts: 184
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 08, 2009

Re: MIN - PHI - SAC 

Post#8 » by Bring Back 1983 » Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:49 pm

By no means do I speak for all Sixers fans, but I think they would love that deal depending on how our scheduled work-out of Cousins and Favors goes tomorrow. It would put us in the Carmelo sweepstakes in 2011 and in addition to the getting a guarantee of either Favors or Cousins, we could use the 16 to move up for Xavier Henry.

That said, I do wonder if too much has been put out there about us and Turner for this to be swallowed as anything other than a money move.
User avatar
Casperkid23
Pro Prospect
Posts: 780
And1: 6
Joined: Sep 20, 2008

Re: MIN - PHI - SAC 

Post#9 » by Casperkid23 » Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:50 pm

Think that's enough for Philadelphia if they truly are as in love with Turner as their fans are? From my standpoint, they're getting a hell of a deal - but I'm not rabid over Turner and actually like Favors slightly more and Cousins only slightly less.

From the Timberwolves standpoint I do it, but then they aren't taking advantage of the best frontcourt draft in a while. However, if I were running the draft, I'd pick Favors at #2 so then that point would be moot :wizard:

Imagine Twolves taking Favors at #2, so then the Nets are left thinking WTF because they wanted Favors more as well, and then make a deal with Minnesota #3 for #5 and Pekovic (maybe some other things thrown in so NJ comes out cap neutral even if they sign Pek) so they can nab Johnson... then the Timberwolves leave the draft with Favors and Turner.

:rockon:
NBA Draft Fanatic.
rpa
RealGM
Posts: 15,053
And1: 7,865
Joined: Nov 24, 2006

Re: MIN - PHI - SAC 

Post#10 » by rpa » Wed Jun 16, 2010 7:05 pm

The biggest problem with any trade where the Kings trade down to 7 is that you don't know what the Warriors do at 6. The base assumption is that Sac trades down because they can't get Cousins at 5 and thus their target would be Monroe who they'd then target at 7 (which is what I assume you meant by "still gets the same player"). Problem is the Warriors could very well target Monroe at 6 (he could arguably be BPA and he'd definitely be the best fit of all the available players).
eToasT
Sophomore
Posts: 223
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2009

Re: MIN - PHI - SAC 

Post#11 » by eToasT » Wed Jun 16, 2010 7:16 pm

Wow, can you email this trade to Kahn?
funkatron101
General Manager
Posts: 7,741
And1: 1,177
Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Location: St. Paul

Re: MIN - PHI - SAC 

Post#12 » by funkatron101 » Wed Jun 16, 2010 7:23 pm

*Edit.

I like your second deal, I had mixed them up at first. I think it addresses a need to the Kings and it gets out of Nocioni's contract.

Still seems almost too good for us. Philly fans will also say no.
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
User avatar
Saltine
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,396
And1: 1,002
Joined: Jul 20, 2003
Location: Land o' Lakes
     

Re: MIN - PHI - SAC 

Post#13 » by Saltine » Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:42 pm

Nice trades. I like them both, send em to Kahn! :)
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: MIN - PHI - SAC 

Post#14 » by Krapinsky » Thu Jun 17, 2010 12:14 am

Sorry to rain on the fun parade, but the 76ers are going to be nixers here.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: MIN - PHI - SAC 

Post#15 » by shrink » Thu Jun 17, 2010 3:22 am

Bring Back 1983 wrote:By no means do I speak for all Sixers fans, but I think they would love that deal depending on how our scheduled work-out of Cousins and Favors goes tomorrow. It would put us in the Carmelo sweepstakes in 2011 and in addition to the getting a guarantee of either Favors or Cousins, we could use the 16 to move up for Xavier Henry.

That said, I do wonder if too much has been put out there about us and Turner for this to be swallowed as anything other than a money move.


I understand the hype around Turner, but I think this is a deal that management could sell to Sixer fans.

"We love Evan Turner, but we thought this was a deal we couldn't refuse. We see this as a four-player draft, and DeMarcus Cousins arguably has the potential to be the best guy of the four. Next, we get a second 1st rounder, just outside the lottery. This draft is particularly deep because of the impending lock-out, so we expect to add another starter locked into a four-year rookie deal. And on top of all this, we get to add the veteran experience of All Star-caliber Tayshaun Prince - a player Doug Collins loves. We still believe Evan Turner will be a good player, but this return was just to good to refuse.
is1531
Banned User
Posts: 1,427
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 02, 2007

Re: MIN - PHI - SAC 

Post#16 » by is1531 » Thu Jun 17, 2010 3:34 am

shrink wrote:This is the deal I'd like to see:

SAC GIVES: #5 + Nocioni
SAC GETS: Jefferson + 23

PHI GIVES: 2 + Dalembert
PHI GETS: 4 + 16 + Nocioni + $7 mil in cap space

MIN GIVES: 4 + 16 + 23 + Jefferson
MIN GETS: 2 + 5 + Dalembert


SAC: This is the deal that has been considered to be roughly fair. There are people on both sides that question it, but it makes sense because of the individual value. At #5, if Cousins is gone, SAC is forced to add another SF in Wes Johnson, or to go with their personal favorite Monroe. Neither are good value for the Kings at #5, and are unlikely to be as good as Al. Jefferson is already a proven performer, and they get a chance to buy him low. They move an unhappy Nocioni that isn't worth his contract, and use the cap space to add another pick late in the 1st.

PHI: PHI gets its two picks, and gets under the lux. Whether you love cousins or hate him, he has tremendous upside. People question whether Turner and Iguodala can play together, and that would not be an issue for DMC or Favors if he drops (NJN may pick cousins if they think they will bring in one of the many elite PF FA's. The $7 mil cap space help is key here, and saves the Philly about $13-14 mil. Using Dalembert's over-priced deal creates minutes for Cousins.

MIN uses Al and all its picks to get the pair of players that best fit a future with Rubio. The #2 and #5 have more value to MIN than the other teams in the neighborhood because of their fit, and by paying all their assets, they come out of the draft with their team of the future. Perhaps they could swing a Love + Pekovic to NJN for #3 as well, if they want to go super-young.



The 76ers will pass on this deal. They are selecting Truck Turner.
is1531
Banned User
Posts: 1,427
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 02, 2007

Re: MIN - PHI - SAC 

Post#17 » by is1531 » Thu Jun 17, 2010 3:35 am

No deal!. The 76ers say no!
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 92,820
And1: 37,039
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

Re: MIN - PHI - SAC 

Post#18 » by RIPskaterdude » Thu Jun 17, 2010 4:21 am

shrink wrote:If SAC doesn't want Al and is set on trading down for Monroe, spinning this through DET works too.

SAC GIVES: 5 + Nocioni
SAC GETS: 7 + 23 + Dalembert

PHI GIVES: 2 + Dalembert
PHI GETS: 4 + 16 + Nocioni + $7 mil in cap space

MIN GIVES: 4 + 16 + 23 + Jefferson
MIN GETS: 2 + 5 + Prince

DET GIVES: 7 + Prince
DET GETS: Jefferson


DET and PHI get the same deal.

SAC trades down but still gets the same player, adds Dalembert who is a better fit and expiring, and adds a late 1st.

MIN doesn't mind getting Prince or Dalembert.


Kings do this in a heart beat. Dalembert + 23 > Prince. Nice trade.
Image
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,742
And1: 2,567
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: MIN - PHI - SAC 

Post#19 » by younggunsmn » Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:11 am

76ers are not taking nocioni.

Send Prince to Philly and Nocioni to Minnesota and you get closer to a deal.

I still don't think Detroit considers 7+prince for Jefferson when they can probably get cousins+nocioni for the same package on draft day.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: MIN - PHI - SAC 

Post#20 » by shrink » Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:22 am

younggunsmn wrote:76ers are not taking nocioni.

Send Prince to Philly and Nocioni to Minnesota and you get closer to a deal.

I still don't think Detroit considers 7+prince for Jefferson when they can probably get cousins+nocioni for the same package on draft day.


The idea was that "Dalembert for Nocioni + $7 mil in cap space" would provide the tax relief up front, and when they need it, saving them $13-14 mil, and paying for Nocioni's second year for free and still clear cash. Dally for Prince is an upgrade, but doesn't save them enough moolah.

I had a lot of stuff going through my mind at the time, but MIN can amp up the deal a little more along your lines, by sending Prince, and taking on Nocioni and Kapono's expiring. This would make the deal:

SAC GIVES: 5 + Nocioni
SAC GETS: 7 + 23 + Dalembert

PHI GIVES: 2 + Dalembert + Kapono
PHI GETS: 4 + 16 + Prince + $7 mil in cap space ($13-14 mil in savings)

MIN GIVES: 4 + 16 + 23 + Jefferson
MIN GETS: 2 + 5 + Nocioni + Kapono

DET GIVES: 7 + Prince
DET GETS: Jefferson


MIN adds Nocioni's 2010-11 salary, and PHI still gets their cap space and a better player.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves