Post#9 » by younggunsmn » Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:35 am
I read the whole thing. It's nice seeing that he is doing his due diligence chasing down all scenarios, but if he is SERIOUSLY considering letting another team dictate who we use one of our draft picks on, for a sign and trade that there is a small chance the player will even agree to, he is OUT OF HIS MIND and clearly learned nothing at all from the Flynn/Tyreke/James Johnson fiasco last draft. This also takes us out of good opportunities to trade up or down by essentially freezing the draft pick.
Joe Johnson, Amare, Bosh, Rudy Gay are the only likely targets. Of those Gay is the only one we have a reasonable shot at. But Why in the world would memphis take Al Jefferson but not be willing to match Rudy Gay? Thabeet is their only bad deal and he still has potential. I can see Kahn offering Al+ a future 1st for an overpaid Gay, and I don't think that's a good idea at all.
However Danny Granger is Base Year Comp until 7/1, which means he ain't going anywhere until then. I could totally see us drafting a player at 4,16,or 23 for Indy and trading it when the moratorium lifts in a package for Granger. That kind of deal is okay as long as you can trust whomever you are dealing with not to welch on it and you don't give up the farm for him.
Hopefully this is all smoke, and those "deals in principle" really involve us maneuvering in the draft and/or dealing Al or Love for a top 7 pick.
I'd blow it off as smoke, but JustAFan's "source" has been consistently anti-kahn, unlike the other ones that are for the most part giving a vague believable company line. That scares me a little as it might be an actual "leak" and not smoke they are filtering out there. Of course just as likely it's a lonely guy in his mom's basement.
If they trade for Melo without an extension and give up any decent assets, they should just fold the team, what an embarrassment that would be when he walked.
Much more likely "deal in principle" scenarios for our capspace involve us absorbing contracts and picking up assets (the opposite of his scenario). Miami may be drafting at 18 for US if we take a contract along with sending us a future 1st. So could Chicago at 17, or a team with potential tax problems like Utah at 9 or NO at 11. Such trades would probably be announced after the draft, even if they couldn't be executed for another 2 weeks, to prevent fans from falling in love with their draft pick.
Interesting with Utah telling D. Jones they were getting a pick in the 20's to convince him to come in for a workout. could be us at 23. 16+23 is interesting, could be memphis, they can offer 12+25. Maybe Pekovic+23 for 9, that would be awesome.