JD45 wrote:A recurring theme that we have not discussed is that Miller is clearly on the block. So I assume that means the Blazers have concluded he is just not a good fit.
Not necessarily. He has a valuable expiring contract and he's older than our core, I think those are the main reason why he's on the block.
BballFanAddict wrote:Unless you got a PG coming in better than Miller I don't see any reason to trade him for the 10th pick. Indiana does it as a stop-gap then an expiring is why they'd be interested. That and I believe the relationship with Ford has been on and off with Indiana's FO.
More off than on it seems.
cucad8 wrote:You're right, sorry. Forgot to add the 100,000 to the 125%. I suppose the "benefit" of a deal like that, as part of a bigger deal is, Miller could bring back slightly over 8.5, whereas Ford can bring back 10.7. Maybe you then include HIM to N.O., with the 10, and add in Julian Wright as well? Haha. I need to drop the Paul thought.
Ya, I'm not too optimistic about getting Paul, but that's the only way in which downgrading from Miller to Ford makes sense. They have to be 110% sure that this move guarantees them a quality PG. Because if they make that move for the #10 pick but end up stuck with TJ Ford as their starting PG for next season...... Ugh.
EDIT: Oh wait, there's a 3 month moratorium on re-trading recently traded for players. That means we couldn't combine Ford with Prybilla and young guys until late September. That's no good.