ImageImageImage

LeBron Free Agency 2010

Moderator: ijspeelman

User avatar
gflem
Analyst
Posts: 3,076
And1: 281
Joined: Sep 11, 2004

Re: LeBron Free Agency 2010 

Post#281 » by gflem » Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:58 pm

Source?
H00PDREAMS
Veteran
Posts: 2,833
And1: 113
Joined: Oct 26, 2005
Location: Lompoc, CA/ Santa Barbara County
Contact:
 

Re: LeBron Free Agency 2010 

Post#282 » by H00PDREAMS » Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:39 pm

I think Stephen A. did break the Shaq to Miami trade. And he also broke the Kobe wanted to be traded talk when all that drama was going on.

Not saying that he can't be wrong. I am just saying he's also had some dead on hits. :nod:
User avatar
gflem
Analyst
Posts: 3,076
And1: 281
Joined: Sep 11, 2004

Re: LeBron Free Agency 2010 

Post#283 » by gflem » Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:37 pm

Throw enough sh!+ at the wall and something eventually will stick. I see Bucher is reporting that the Cavs arent interested in any S&T for Lebron. Well, that is what a lot of us figured. If he leaves, its all on him, and we go into rebuild mode immediately.
Smoke[MaxX]
Senior
Posts: 644
And1: 36
Joined: Feb 12, 2007

Re: LeBron Free Agency 2010 

Post#284 » by Smoke[MaxX] » Tue Jun 29, 2010 6:37 pm

gflem wrote:Throw enough sh!+ at the wall and something eventually will stick. I see Bucher is reporting that the Cavs arent interested in any S&T for Lebron. Well, that is what a lot of us figured. If he leaves, its all on him, and we go into rebuild mode immediately.

Or if you S&T him, you have that exact same option plus draft picks...
User avatar
TheJohnWallShow
Junior
Posts: 462
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 11, 2010

Re: LeBron Free Agency 2010 

Post#285 » by TheJohnWallShow » Tue Jun 29, 2010 6:47 pm

Cleveland losing LeBron kinda brings a smile to my face after what their front office pulled last year with the Antawn Jamison for free trade, and Big Z coming back. Sorry Cleveland fans who actually still like Bron :-?
User avatar
gflem
Analyst
Posts: 3,076
And1: 281
Joined: Sep 11, 2004

Re: LeBron Free Agency 2010 

Post#286 » by gflem » Tue Jun 29, 2010 6:59 pm

Its not the first time thats been done. And in fact, it backfiring the way it did and the fact it cost our team on the salary cap may well be the reason Lebron leaves since we have no real flexibility to acquire anyone without a S&T.
And as for a S&T with Lebron, that subject has been beat to death on this board, I was commenting on the fact that Bucher is reporting that the team has no interest in any kind of S&T for him. Which doesnt surprise me at all.
Pula_86
Junior
Posts: 418
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 06, 2009

Re: LeBron Free Agency 2010 

Post#287 » by Pula_86 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:08 pm

TheJohnWallShow wrote:Cleveland losing LeBron kinda brings a smile to my face after what their front office pulled last year with the Antawn Jamison for free trade, and Big Z coming back. Sorry Cleveland fans who actually still like Bron :-?


You mean what just about every other NBA team has done in the past? How dare the Cavs play by the rules. Remember that the Wizards did NOT have to waive Big Z if they did not want to.
User avatar
TheJohnWallShow
Junior
Posts: 462
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 11, 2010

Re: LeBron Free Agency 2010 

Post#288 » by TheJohnWallShow » Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:09 pm

Pula_86 wrote:
TheJohnWallShow wrote:Cleveland losing LeBron kinda brings a smile to my face after what their front office pulled last year with the Antawn Jamison for free trade, and Big Z coming back. Sorry Cleveland fans who actually still like Bron :-?


You mean what just about every other NBA team has done in the past? How dare the Cavs play by the rules. Remember that the Wizards did NOT have to waive Big Z if they did not want to.


If thats "playing by the rules", then im sure you had no problem at all with the lakers trade to get Gasol, right?
TheOUTLAW
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 41,920
And1: 2,757
Joined: Aug 23, 2002
     

Re: LeBron Free Agency 2010 

Post#289 » by TheOUTLAW » Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:28 pm

It's idiotic to blame the Cavs front office for the Jamison trade. There was never any guarantee that Washington was going to release Z to begin with.
UncleDrew wrote: I get Buckets!
User avatar
TheJohnWallShow
Junior
Posts: 462
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 11, 2010

Re: LeBron Free Agency 2010 

Post#290 » by TheJohnWallShow » Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:29 pm

TheOUTLAW wrote:It's idiotic to blame the Cavs front office for the Jamison trade. There was never any guarantee that Washington was going to release Z to begin with.


I highly doubt that, I think it was already set up that way.
Pula_86
Junior
Posts: 418
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 06, 2009

Re: LeBron Free Agency 2010 

Post#291 » by Pula_86 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:30 pm

TheJohnWallShow wrote:
Pula_86 wrote:
TheJohnWallShow wrote:Cleveland losing LeBron kinda brings a smile to my face after what their front office pulled last year with the Antawn Jamison for free trade, and Big Z coming back. Sorry Cleveland fans who actually still like Bron :-?


You mean what just about every other NBA team has done in the past? How dare the Cavs play by the rules. Remember that the Wizards did NOT have to waive Big Z if they did not want to.


If thats "playing by the rules", then im sure you had no problem at all with the lakers trade to get Gasol, right?


Why would I have a problem with the Lakers trade for Gasol? I may question what the Grizzlies received, but that would be a criticism aimed at the Memphis GM and not the actual trade itself. Similarly, the GM that deserves the criticism is the Wizards. The Cavs did nothing that is not already allowed.
TheOUTLAW
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 41,920
And1: 2,757
Joined: Aug 23, 2002
     

Re: LeBron Free Agency 2010 

Post#292 » by TheOUTLAW » Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:33 pm

TheJohnWallShow wrote:
TheOUTLAW wrote:It's idiotic to blame the Cavs front office for the Jamison trade. There was never any guarantee that Washington was going to release Z to begin with.


I highly doubt that, I think it was already set up that way.


Oh I think that the Cavs were of the belief that the Wiz had no need for him other than as a contract, but no matter what you might think, it was totally up to them what they did after the trade.

There is far more evidence of tampering with LeBron than there ever was of the Cavs doing anything wrong in the Jamison trade. That being said, I also have no problem with the Lakers trade other than the fact that I think there were better trades out there for Memphis.
UncleDrew wrote: I get Buckets!
User avatar
gflem
Analyst
Posts: 3,076
And1: 281
Joined: Sep 11, 2004

Re: LeBron Free Agency 2010 

Post#293 » by gflem » Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:45 pm

Guys, its a Wiz fan, and no matter how many teams have done the same thing in the past, we are the ones cheating in his mind.
User avatar
TheJohnWallShow
Junior
Posts: 462
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 11, 2010

Re: LeBron Free Agency 2010 

Post#294 » by TheJohnWallShow » Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:17 pm

gflem wrote:Guys, its a Wiz fan, and no matter how many teams have done the same thing in the past, we are the ones cheating in his mind.


Not a Wiz fan, just a John Wall fan. And its not just that trade that was shady, theres plenty trades like that that happen, Spurs have done it quite a few times, NBA needs to make the rules less leniant
User avatar
Benedict_Boozer
RealGM
Posts: 17,115
And1: 5,817
Joined: Aug 08, 2004

Re: LeBron Free Agency 2010 

Post#295 » by Benedict_Boozer » Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:33 pm

gflem wrote:Its not the first time thats been done. And in fact, it backfiring the way it did and the fact it cost our team on the salary cap may well be the reason Lebron leaves since we have no real flexibility to acquire anyone without a S&T.
And as for a S&T with Lebron, that subject has been beat to death on this board, I was commenting on the fact that Bucher is reporting that the team has no interest in any kind of S&T for him. Which doesnt surprise me at all.


Yes in retrospect, gunning for a title through the use of the MLE and BAE was a mistake. At the same time if ORL had made all these improvements and we had stood pat after losing to them last year to preserve cap space, Lebron would have been pissed - so it was a lose lose scenario.

The real mistake is we kind of did a little of both. Ferry made deals with the idea of having 2010 cap space (see Shaq instead of Kaman, sitting on the Wally contract) and then mid-stream changed to adding contracts like Moon, Parker, Jamison, etc. that would eat the cap space.

We should have picked a direction and stuck to it, but that's easy to say in hindsight. And we did post the best record in the league 2 years straight...
User avatar
gflem
Analyst
Posts: 3,076
And1: 281
Joined: Sep 11, 2004

Re: LeBron Free Agency 2010 

Post#296 » by gflem » Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:46 pm

TheJohnWallShow wrote:
gflem wrote:Guys, its a Wiz fan, and no matter how many teams have done the same thing in the past, we are the ones cheating in his mind.


Not a Wiz fan, just a John Wall fan. And its not just that trade that was shady, theres plenty trades like that that happen, Spurs have done it quite a few times, NBA needs to make the rules less leniant

OK, this I agree with. Why the Cavs hate then? Is it Lebron you dont like, or is it that a team with Lebron took avantage of a shady rule (which is what I think)? Edit: typo
User avatar
TheJohnWallShow
Junior
Posts: 462
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 11, 2010

Re: LeBron Free Agency 2010 

Post#297 » by TheJohnWallShow » Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:04 pm

I just hate that rule pretty much, they need to revise it and make restrictions on trades so we dont get another "Laker gift" I blame Stern
TheOUTLAW
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 41,920
And1: 2,757
Joined: Aug 23, 2002
     

Re: LeBron Free Agency 2010 

Post#298 » by TheOUTLAW » Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:28 pm

There is no way to revise the trade rules to preclude a gift like the lakers received. They just found a team that wanted out of a top 10-15 player deal (which is odd). The NBA has never really ever stepped in to prevent a team from screwing themselves.
User avatar
gflem
Analyst
Posts: 3,076
And1: 281
Joined: Sep 11, 2004

Re: LeBron Free Agency 2010 

Post#299 » by gflem » Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:52 pm

Well, they have, and it was for our team. I'm sure you remember the Stepian rule. Sadly for those of us who are old enough to remember, those were some horrible years.
TheOUTLAW
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 41,920
And1: 2,757
Joined: Aug 23, 2002
     

Re: LeBron Free Agency 2010 

Post#300 » by TheOUTLAW » Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:18 am

The Stepien rule allowed the NBA to review blatantly bad trades, but I really don't know of any that they've blocked. It also prevented people from trading consecutive 1st rounders.
UncleDrew wrote: I get Buckets!

Return to Cleveland Cavaliers