If Joe signs here ...
Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver
If Joe signs here ...
- evildallas
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,412
- And1: 1
- Joined: Aug 11, 2005
- Location: in the land of weak ownership
- Contact:
If Joe signs here ...
How can the roster be improved? Any ideas?
The only thing I came up with is working a deal with Toronto and reaching out to Bosh. I'm not sure Bosh is enough of an upgrade over Josh Smith, but it would have the added bonus of keeping him out of Miami, Chicago, or Cleveland. The issue of course would be convincing him to come here to play.
I've looked around the league to see what Marvin Williams could bring in trade, but I didn't see much that would help. If Joe resigns then I don't think Marvin will get the opportunities to improve and contribute. We need to ultimately get a cheaper contribution from that position. Jamal Crawford should be our most movable asset, but I wasn't really seeing anything that would really help the team either. The bigs that could help out are mainly free agents and the club doesn't want to use the MLE. If that wasn't the case investing in Brad Miller to be backup C would really help the team with his ability to stretch the floor.
Really I am without a good idea on how to make the team any better and that makes me sad.
The only thing I came up with is working a deal with Toronto and reaching out to Bosh. I'm not sure Bosh is enough of an upgrade over Josh Smith, but it would have the added bonus of keeping him out of Miami, Chicago, or Cleveland. The issue of course would be convincing him to come here to play.
I've looked around the league to see what Marvin Williams could bring in trade, but I didn't see much that would help. If Joe resigns then I don't think Marvin will get the opportunities to improve and contribute. We need to ultimately get a cheaper contribution from that position. Jamal Crawford should be our most movable asset, but I wasn't really seeing anything that would really help the team either. The bigs that could help out are mainly free agents and the club doesn't want to use the MLE. If that wasn't the case investing in Brad Miller to be backup C would really help the team with his ability to stretch the floor.
Really I am without a good idea on how to make the team any better and that makes me sad.
Going to donkey punch a leprechaun!
Re: If Joe signs here ...
- ATL DirtyBird
- Starter
- Posts: 2,203
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 20, 2008
- Location: Atlanta: Where the Hawks play hard 26 games a year!
Re: If Joe signs here ...
Per Adrian Wojo twitter
League exec. says ATL owners thought for offering Joe Johnson max deal is they won't still own Hawks at end of contract to have to pay it.
UNFACKING BELIEVABLE. Im gonna hang myself if that douche signs here. Its gonna be real tough for me to cheer for this team anymore with the way we are going.
League exec. says ATL owners thought for offering Joe Johnson max deal is they won't still own Hawks at end of contract to have to pay it.
UNFACKING BELIEVABLE. Im gonna hang myself if that douche signs here. Its gonna be real tough for me to cheer for this team anymore with the way we are going.
Is it to much to ask for a team that plays hard and cares? Seems so.
Re: If Joe signs here ...
- Dale Cooper
- Sophomore
- Posts: 149
- And1: 6
- Joined: Apr 01, 2010
- Location: Seattle
-
Re: If Joe signs here ...
By trading him (with Bibby and/or Marvin perhaps?) for a real PG and/or cap room, then signing Josh Childress?
Re: If Joe signs here ...
- Space Jam
- Sophomore
- Posts: 198
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 23, 2010
Re: If Joe signs here ...
^^I agree. I go to around 15 home games per year, and I'd rather pay to see Jordan start then this loser.
Re: If Joe signs here ...
- Space Jam
- Sophomore
- Posts: 198
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 23, 2010
Re: If Joe signs here ...
Dale Cooper wrote:By trading him (with Bibby and/or Marvin perhaps?) for a real PG and/or cap room, then signing Josh Childress?
We have a real PG his name is Jeff Teague.
Re: If Joe signs here ...
- Dale Cooper
- Sophomore
- Posts: 149
- And1: 6
- Joined: Apr 01, 2010
- Location: Seattle
-
Re: If Joe signs here ...
Here's hoping he doesn't have another terrible season.
Re: If Joe signs here ...
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 8
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 17, 2010
Re: If Joe signs here ...
Bring in Childress or trade his rights for a Big. Adding Childress will be a big time lift.
Re: If Joe signs here ...
-
- Forum Mod - Hawks
- Posts: 8,745
- And1: 1,727
- Joined: Jun 27, 2005
-
Re: If Joe signs here ...
I say bring in a backup big and see how the roster plays. I want to see marvin in a new offense first before we ship him off.
The moderator formerly known as uga_dawgs24
Re: If Joe signs here ...
- jc23
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,416
- And1: 12,221
- Joined: May 31, 2010
- Location: 1901 W.Madsion St
-
Re: If Joe signs here ...
Y! Free Agency Buzz: Joe Johnson will accept Hawks max offer soon, sources say; Pacers targeting Farmar. http://tinyurl.com/2aodsjc 5 minutes ago via web
"Showing off is the fool's idea of glory"
-Bruce Lee
-Bruce Lee
Re: If Joe signs here ...
- Master8492
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 989
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Re: If Joe signs here ...
uga_dawgs24 wrote:I say bring in a backup big and see how the roster plays. I want to see marvin in a new offense first before we ship him off.
The Hawks should've drafted Whiteside to be that backup big. I still can't believe they pass up on a potential big like that.
Re: If Joe signs here ...
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,858
- And1: 70
- Joined: Aug 23, 2005
- Location: CATLANTA
Re: If Joe signs here ...
Now it appears the Joe is coming back (which is 26% of our cap number) and the ASG not willing to exceed the cap, we have very limited options.
The best we will get for Chills is perhaps another reserve. What needs to be improved on this team is the front 5. Teague being a starter isn't going to be enough.
We haven't yet addressed the interior of this team.
Is there any cap money left once Joe signs? I think Crawford is going to have to be dealt to bring us something because he isn't replacing Joe and my guess is he wants to start again.
If you are going to sign Joe to that kind of $$, then ASG/Sund needs to improve our core 3 of Joe/Smoove/Al.
The best we will get for Chills is perhaps another reserve. What needs to be improved on this team is the front 5. Teague being a starter isn't going to be enough.
We haven't yet addressed the interior of this team.
Is there any cap money left once Joe signs? I think Crawford is going to have to be dealt to bring us something because he isn't replacing Joe and my guess is he wants to start again.
If you are going to sign Joe to that kind of $$, then ASG/Sund needs to improve our core 3 of Joe/Smoove/Al.
Re: If Joe signs here ...
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 8,784
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jun 16, 2002
Re: If Joe signs here ...
i think if Joe resigns, it will be a step back for the Hawks. once Joe signs a max with the Hawks (hopefully he doesn't) he will be one of those players that will be impossible to trade away. i also think that once Joe signs an extension with the Hawks, he will be on the decline, especially on the mental and work ethic aspect.
Re: If Joe signs here ...
- evildallas
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,412
- And1: 1
- Joined: Aug 11, 2005
- Location: in the land of weak ownership
- Contact:
Re: If Joe signs here ...
Cunningham entry on why the ASG did it
EDIT - Forgot to say I'll believe it when I see it.
Atlanta’s basketball people recognize that re-signing J.J. alone isn’t enough to improve the team (because, well, it’s basically the same team) and ASG is not opposed to exceeding the luxury-tax threshold to sign the right player. That’s a good thing since they don’t have much choice.
EDIT - Forgot to say I'll believe it when I see it.
Re: If Joe signs here ...
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 45
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 30, 2008
Re: If Joe signs here ...
Hawks fans have really short memories, the Hawks SUCKED before JJ got here, no playoffs, always in the lottery, no hope. JJ turned the franchise around so be glad that he wants to finish what he started rather than bail on some of you fickle fans.
Re: If Joe signs here ...
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,294
- And1: 604
- Joined: Oct 23, 2004
Re: If Joe signs here ...
dejaman wrote:Hawks fans have really short memories, the Hawks SUCKED before JJ got here, no playoffs, always in the lottery, no hope.
Do you remember how the Hawks got into that situation, dejaman?
Re: If Joe signs here ...
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,321
- And1: 3
- Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Re: If Joe signs here ...
mrhonline wrote:dejaman wrote:Hawks fans have really short memories, the Hawks SUCKED before JJ got here, no playoffs, always in the lottery, no hope.
Do you remember how the Hawks got into that situation, dejaman?
Babcock trying to save his job by trading lottery picks for short term regular season victories.
Re: If Joe signs here ...
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,294
- And1: 604
- Joined: Oct 23, 2004
Re: If Joe signs here ...
HoopsGuru25 wrote:Babcock trying to save his job by trading lottery picks for short term regular season victories.
That wasn't the only thing that nice man did wrong...I seem to remember something about some overpriced contracts...
Re: If Joe signs here ...
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,622
- And1: 16
- Joined: May 23, 2007
Re: If Joe signs here ...
dejaman wrote:Hawks fans have really short memories, the Hawks SUCKED before JJ got here, no playoffs, always in the lottery, no hope. JJ turned the franchise around so be glad that he wants to finish what he started rather than bail on some of you fickle fans.
This. And the nation has short memories. People were saying Joe Johnson's deal was a joke the FIRST TIME he signed here.
ANybody remember that? Wish I had the articles saved.
All he's done is turn this team around from laughing stock to 50+ win ball club
Shaheen wrote:You wanna make a sig bet that Horford will not win this year? They will not even hit .500. Book it.

Re: If Joe signs here ...
- evildallas
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,412
- And1: 1
- Joined: Aug 11, 2005
- Location: in the land of weak ownership
- Contact:
Re: If Joe signs here ...
Post-Joe signing plan trying to remain somewhat realistic in the acquisitions.
Marvin Williams and a 1st rounder to Golden State for Andrins Biedrins
Josh Smith and Mike Bibby to Houston for Shane Battier, Kyle Lowry (S&T), Luis Scola (S&T) and a 1st.
Josh Childress S&T to Washington for Javale McGee (might be a pipe dream)
If that isn't possible then go after Brad Miller with the full MLE
New lineup
Jeff Teague/Kyle Lowry
Joe Johnson/Jamal Crawford/Jordan Crawford
Shane Battier/Mo Evans
Al Horford/Luis Scola
Adrins Biedrins/McGee or Miller/Zaza Pachulia
reasons for and why it could happen:
The Golden State deal is about swapping players who dropped off after signing big contracts to hope that situation changes help both. Throwing in a pick because Center is harder to fill than SF/PF. If necessary I'd get creative on the pick protection to make it more attractive or add a second pick to the puzzle to get this done, but that's a last resort if they play tough.
The Houston deal is a response to them chasing a top PF like Bosh or Amare in S&T and coming up short. Josh Smith isn't the level of shooter, but he is a better help defender and could explode in kept near the basket. This is about getting Al to PF as well. As for what we get back Lowry is a less expensive PG who can help ease the transition to Teague. Battier is expiring and is brought in as a glue guy to do whatever the lineup on the floor needs. He also raises the collective basketball IQ of the Hawks which is important. Scola was mentioned as who they were dangling for the PF upgrade so I just jumped on that. The pick is because the value still wasn't quite right. I sent Bibby back because he would be a good backup for Aaron Brooks and that lineup would hid his defensive flaws (with Yao and Josh in the middle). Next season he's a expiring contract they can turn into another asset. If Scola is a breaking point I'd do it for Chuck Hayes and another pick as well.
The Washington deal was because of their rumored interest in Childress. I doubt actually getting McGee back, but it was worth a mention. We have to stick to our guns that we'll match his contract if they don't do the deal. I know that Childress could be our Battier, but he's been very candid about not wanting to play here again.
The pursuit of Brad Miller depends on the resolution of the Childress situation. If we don't add another C there we need pursue one. With Haywood likely to resign in Dallas I was left with Brad Miller or Jermaine O'Neal and while O'Neal might match up better with Dwight Howard I worry about his motivation. Miller can still stretch the floor which would be handy.
The impetus behind this plan was actually Joe's criticism of the locker room. I hate giving up Josh, but Al seems like a more solid building block and I want to make him happy by getting him in a better position to thrive. I know there is a feeling that we need an elite PG, but I don't really believe that Chris Paul is available. It might be worth it to not to do the Houston deal and wait to see about Paul, but do we even have the right pieces to get him if becomes available? Lowry isn't great but he's good and defensively an improvement which is what we really need. The overall success of this plan depends on Al thriving at the 4. Biedrins bouncing back at the 5 in a new system and of course Teague at PG. We should be stronger defensively even given up our best help defender because we improved in perimeter and positional D. I think the lineup could be better poised for post-season success because of the defense.
Still don't like the Joe contract, but that's my idea to make the best of it.
Marvin Williams and a 1st rounder to Golden State for Andrins Biedrins
Josh Smith and Mike Bibby to Houston for Shane Battier, Kyle Lowry (S&T), Luis Scola (S&T) and a 1st.
Josh Childress S&T to Washington for Javale McGee (might be a pipe dream)
If that isn't possible then go after Brad Miller with the full MLE
New lineup
Jeff Teague/Kyle Lowry
Joe Johnson/Jamal Crawford/Jordan Crawford
Shane Battier/Mo Evans
Al Horford/Luis Scola
Adrins Biedrins/McGee or Miller/Zaza Pachulia
reasons for and why it could happen:
The Golden State deal is about swapping players who dropped off after signing big contracts to hope that situation changes help both. Throwing in a pick because Center is harder to fill than SF/PF. If necessary I'd get creative on the pick protection to make it more attractive or add a second pick to the puzzle to get this done, but that's a last resort if they play tough.
The Houston deal is a response to them chasing a top PF like Bosh or Amare in S&T and coming up short. Josh Smith isn't the level of shooter, but he is a better help defender and could explode in kept near the basket. This is about getting Al to PF as well. As for what we get back Lowry is a less expensive PG who can help ease the transition to Teague. Battier is expiring and is brought in as a glue guy to do whatever the lineup on the floor needs. He also raises the collective basketball IQ of the Hawks which is important. Scola was mentioned as who they were dangling for the PF upgrade so I just jumped on that. The pick is because the value still wasn't quite right. I sent Bibby back because he would be a good backup for Aaron Brooks and that lineup would hid his defensive flaws (with Yao and Josh in the middle). Next season he's a expiring contract they can turn into another asset. If Scola is a breaking point I'd do it for Chuck Hayes and another pick as well.
The Washington deal was because of their rumored interest in Childress. I doubt actually getting McGee back, but it was worth a mention. We have to stick to our guns that we'll match his contract if they don't do the deal. I know that Childress could be our Battier, but he's been very candid about not wanting to play here again.
The pursuit of Brad Miller depends on the resolution of the Childress situation. If we don't add another C there we need pursue one. With Haywood likely to resign in Dallas I was left with Brad Miller or Jermaine O'Neal and while O'Neal might match up better with Dwight Howard I worry about his motivation. Miller can still stretch the floor which would be handy.
The impetus behind this plan was actually Joe's criticism of the locker room. I hate giving up Josh, but Al seems like a more solid building block and I want to make him happy by getting him in a better position to thrive. I know there is a feeling that we need an elite PG, but I don't really believe that Chris Paul is available. It might be worth it to not to do the Houston deal and wait to see about Paul, but do we even have the right pieces to get him if becomes available? Lowry isn't great but he's good and defensively an improvement which is what we really need. The overall success of this plan depends on Al thriving at the 4. Biedrins bouncing back at the 5 in a new system and of course Teague at PG. We should be stronger defensively even given up our best help defender because we improved in perimeter and positional D. I think the lineup could be better poised for post-season success because of the defense.
Still don't like the Joe contract, but that's my idea to make the best of it.