Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?

Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS

Montanajazz
Junior
Posts: 320
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 06, 2009

Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!? 

Post#1 » by Montanajazz » Tue Jul 6, 2010 10:57 pm

Why haven't the jazz jumped on the sign and trade with Orlando with Boozer for Bass, Petrus, and Gortat? The Jazz could throw in Kufous to make the deal work financially!
stevebozell
Starter
Posts: 2,285
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 09, 2007
Location: Deloris Blazingame's office

Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!? 

Post#2 » by stevebozell » Tue Jul 6, 2010 11:10 pm

Both sides have to want to do the deal. Plus, Im not sold on those 3 players really helping us much, so whats the rush?
hoops4life
General Manager
Posts: 9,121
And1: 31
Joined: May 17, 2005

Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!? 

Post#3 » by hoops4life » Tue Jul 6, 2010 11:24 pm

It takes two to tango.
User avatar
Bruteque
Starter
Posts: 2,148
And1: 1,176
Joined: Feb 19, 2010

Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!? 

Post#4 » by Bruteque » Tue Jul 6, 2010 11:35 pm

The thing with S&T is that you have to take salary back in return. The Jazz doesn't want to take the kind of money Booze wants back in return, so a S&T will have to be for somebody really good. Since Booze is not worth the kind of money he wants, you will have to find a dummy partner to do a S&T the Jazz will take.
stevebozell
Starter
Posts: 2,285
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 09, 2007
Location: Deloris Blazingame's office

Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!? 

Post#5 » by stevebozell » Tue Jul 6, 2010 11:45 pm

Bruteque wrote:The thing with S&T is that you have to take salary back in return. The Jazz doesn't want to take the kind of money Booze wants back in return, so a S&T will have to be for somebody really good. Since Booze is not worth the kind of money he wants, you will have to find a dummy partner to do a S&T the Jazz will take.



If the other team has enough cap room, you dont have to take anything back. I dont think Orlando is under the cap though.
ColdBlue wrote:I think NJN should go to the cave and whip up a Sloan + NJN + anal lube = Championship sig.
HolyToledo
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,110
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 08, 2006

Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!? 

Post#6 » by HolyToledo » Wed Jul 7, 2010 12:17 am

#1 they need to want to have Boozer and pay him alot of money
#2 Boozer has to want to go there instead of Miami and Chicago
#3 and it takes two to tango
User avatar
DelaneyRudd
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 104,536
And1: 9,467
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
     

Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!? 

Post#7 » by DelaneyRudd » Wed Jul 7, 2010 12:24 am

It takes three to do this tango. Jazz, Booz, Magic.
User avatar
DelaneyRudd
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 104,536
And1: 9,467
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
     

Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!? 

Post#8 » by DelaneyRudd » Wed Jul 7, 2010 12:28 am

And sign and trades are less likely to be announced before they can consummate since a change in mind could make some players who are no longer traded unhappy.
User avatar
The Sheik
General Manager
Posts: 8,466
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2006
Location: Irvine, Ca
         

Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!? 

Post#9 » by The Sheik » Wed Jul 7, 2010 1:03 am

Boozer is a base year compensation player. We would only need to take back 12 mil and change. Personally I do not want Pietrius and there is no significant salary relief. With Gortats contract we are likely paying Boozer money for a player(s) that is not on Boozer's level.

I would simply like a S&T to Chicago for Taj Gibson, maybe James Johnson as well.
ADWCTA
Freshman
Posts: 59
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 28, 2007

Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!? 

Post#10 » by ADWCTA » Wed Jul 7, 2010 3:01 am

The Sheik wrote:Boozer is a base year compensation player. We would only need to take back 12 mil and change. Personally I do not want Pietrius and there is no significant salary relief. With Gortats contract we are likely paying Boozer money for a player(s) that is not on Boozer's level.

I would simply like a S&T to Chicago for Taj Gibson, maybe James Johnson as well.


Only 12mil? Have you seen our budget lately...

We're at 57mil out of a 68mil cap with only 8 players signed (including Hayward). That means we'll need 5 more players for 11mil, and any more we pay double for. By all best case scenario standards, assume we get Mathews cheap for 3 mil, no one offers Fesenko and we keep him at 1 mil, then we have 7mil left to take 12mil worth of contracts.... putting us 5 mil into the luxury tax. At what point did we give Brewer's 3mil$ away to cut back on the tax last season? Answer: To go from 5.5 mil over to 2.5 mil over. There's no way in hell we're being 5 mil over this season.

Meaning: There's no way we S&T Boozer unless our trade partner is under the cap or we package in 12mil more in contracts to take back 9.5 mil more (thus saving 2.5 mil on the additions, making the S&T putting us to that 2.5 mil over the tax mark Utah was comfortable paying last season).
User avatar
DelaneyRudd
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 104,536
And1: 9,467
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
     

Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!? 

Post#11 » by DelaneyRudd » Wed Jul 7, 2010 3:09 am

Is 68 the cap or the Luxury thresh hold?
Xanthis
Junior
Posts: 389
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 19, 2009
     

Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!? 

Post#12 » by Xanthis » Wed Jul 7, 2010 3:10 am

I think 68 is the luxury threshold and the cap is the 50s
User avatar
DelaneyRudd
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 104,536
And1: 9,467
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
     

Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!? 

Post#13 » by DelaneyRudd » Wed Jul 7, 2010 3:45 am

Oh, and it's 10 players if you count Jeffers and Gaines under 1 mil contracts.
User avatar
The Sheik
General Manager
Posts: 8,466
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2006
Location: Irvine, Ca
         

Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!? 

Post#14 » by The Sheik » Wed Jul 7, 2010 4:39 am

ADWCTA wrote:
Only 12mil? Have you seen our budget lately...
.


Slow your roll tonto. I never said I wanted to trade for 12 mil and maybe you should read my entire post before you be a douche.
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,083
And1: 3,416
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!? 

Post#15 » by SkyHook » Wed Jul 7, 2010 8:01 am

The Sheik wrote:Boozer is a base year compensation player. We would only need to take back 12 mil and change. Personally I do not want Pietrius and there is no significant salary relief. With Gortats contract we are likely paying Boozer money for a player(s) that is not on Boozer's level.

I would simply like a S&T to Chicago for Taj Gibson, maybe James Johnson as well.


Boozer won't be BYC unless he gets a contract starting at $14.8MM or more (20% raise from previous salary).
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
hoops4life
General Manager
Posts: 9,121
And1: 31
Joined: May 17, 2005

Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!? 

Post#16 » by hoops4life » Wed Jul 7, 2010 1:21 pm

Wow, there are a lot more doom's dayers on here than there was in the past.
Xanthis
Junior
Posts: 389
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 19, 2009
     

Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!? 

Post#17 » by Xanthis » Wed Jul 7, 2010 1:31 pm

hoops4life wrote:Wow, there are a lot more doom's dayers on here than there was in the past.

DOOM!

Return to Utah Jazz