Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS
Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
-
- Junior
- Posts: 320
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 06, 2009
Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
Why haven't the jazz jumped on the sign and trade with Orlando with Boozer for Bass, Petrus, and Gortat? The Jazz could throw in Kufous to make the deal work financially!
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,285
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 09, 2007
- Location: Deloris Blazingame's office
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
Both sides have to want to do the deal. Plus, Im not sold on those 3 players really helping us much, so whats the rush?
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,121
- And1: 31
- Joined: May 17, 2005
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
It takes two to tango.
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
- Bruteque
- Starter
- Posts: 2,148
- And1: 1,176
- Joined: Feb 19, 2010
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
The thing with S&T is that you have to take salary back in return. The Jazz doesn't want to take the kind of money Booze wants back in return, so a S&T will have to be for somebody really good. Since Booze is not worth the kind of money he wants, you will have to find a dummy partner to do a S&T the Jazz will take.
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,285
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 09, 2007
- Location: Deloris Blazingame's office
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
Bruteque wrote:The thing with S&T is that you have to take salary back in return. The Jazz doesn't want to take the kind of money Booze wants back in return, so a S&T will have to be for somebody really good. Since Booze is not worth the kind of money he wants, you will have to find a dummy partner to do a S&T the Jazz will take.
If the other team has enough cap room, you dont have to take anything back. I dont think Orlando is under the cap though.
ColdBlue wrote:I think NJN should go to the cave and whip up a Sloan + NJN + anal lube = Championship sig.
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,110
- And1: 1
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
#1 they need to want to have Boozer and pay him alot of money
#2 Boozer has to want to go there instead of Miami and Chicago
#3 and it takes two to tango
#2 Boozer has to want to go there instead of Miami and Chicago
#3 and it takes two to tango
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
- DelaneyRudd
- Senior Mod
- Posts: 104,536
- And1: 9,467
- Joined: Nov 17, 2006
-
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
It takes three to do this tango. Jazz, Booz, Magic.
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
- DelaneyRudd
- Senior Mod
- Posts: 104,536
- And1: 9,467
- Joined: Nov 17, 2006
-
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
And sign and trades are less likely to be announced before they can consummate since a change in mind could make some players who are no longer traded unhappy.
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
- The Sheik
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,466
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 01, 2006
- Location: Irvine, Ca
-
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
Boozer is a base year compensation player. We would only need to take back 12 mil and change. Personally I do not want Pietrius and there is no significant salary relief. With Gortats contract we are likely paying Boozer money for a player(s) that is not on Boozer's level.
I would simply like a S&T to Chicago for Taj Gibson, maybe James Johnson as well.
I would simply like a S&T to Chicago for Taj Gibson, maybe James Johnson as well.
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
-
- Freshman
- Posts: 59
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 28, 2007
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
The Sheik wrote:Boozer is a base year compensation player. We would only need to take back 12 mil and change. Personally I do not want Pietrius and there is no significant salary relief. With Gortats contract we are likely paying Boozer money for a player(s) that is not on Boozer's level.
I would simply like a S&T to Chicago for Taj Gibson, maybe James Johnson as well.
Only 12mil? Have you seen our budget lately...
We're at 57mil out of a 68mil cap with only 8 players signed (including Hayward). That means we'll need 5 more players for 11mil, and any more we pay double for. By all best case scenario standards, assume we get Mathews cheap for 3 mil, no one offers Fesenko and we keep him at 1 mil, then we have 7mil left to take 12mil worth of contracts.... putting us 5 mil into the luxury tax. At what point did we give Brewer's 3mil$ away to cut back on the tax last season? Answer: To go from 5.5 mil over to 2.5 mil over. There's no way in hell we're being 5 mil over this season.
Meaning: There's no way we S&T Boozer unless our trade partner is under the cap or we package in 12mil more in contracts to take back 9.5 mil more (thus saving 2.5 mil on the additions, making the S&T putting us to that 2.5 mil over the tax mark Utah was comfortable paying last season).
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
- DelaneyRudd
- Senior Mod
- Posts: 104,536
- And1: 9,467
- Joined: Nov 17, 2006
-
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
Is 68 the cap or the Luxury thresh hold?
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
-
- Junior
- Posts: 389
- And1: 2
- Joined: Apr 19, 2009
-
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
I think 68 is the luxury threshold and the cap is the 50s
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
- DelaneyRudd
- Senior Mod
- Posts: 104,536
- And1: 9,467
- Joined: Nov 17, 2006
-
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
Oh, and it's 10 players if you count Jeffers and Gaines under 1 mil contracts.
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
- The Sheik
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,466
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 01, 2006
- Location: Irvine, Ca
-
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
ADWCTA wrote:
Only 12mil? Have you seen our budget lately...
.
Slow your roll tonto. I never said I wanted to trade for 12 mil and maybe you should read my entire post before you be a douche.
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
- SkyHook
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,083
- And1: 3,415
- Joined: Jun 24, 2002
-
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
The Sheik wrote:Boozer is a base year compensation player. We would only need to take back 12 mil and change. Personally I do not want Pietrius and there is no significant salary relief. With Gortats contract we are likely paying Boozer money for a player(s) that is not on Boozer's level.
I would simply like a S&T to Chicago for Taj Gibson, maybe James Johnson as well.
Boozer won't be BYC unless he gets a contract starting at $14.8MM or more (20% raise from previous salary).
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...
... NO, YOU MOVE."
... NO, YOU MOVE."
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,121
- And1: 31
- Joined: May 17, 2005
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
Wow, there are a lot more doom's dayers on here than there was in the past.
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
-
- Junior
- Posts: 389
- And1: 2
- Joined: Apr 19, 2009
-
Re: Why aren't Jazz all over a S&T with Orlando, Now!!?
hoops4life wrote:Wow, there are a lot more doom's dayers on here than there was in the past.
DOOM!