Charlotte Bobcats Current Salary Cap Position

Mezotarkus · Post #1 » by **Mezotarkus** » Sat Jul 17, 2010 2:08 pm

Hey guys - may want to sticky this. The Google doc at the link below shows the Bobcats current salary cap position (including cap holds and luxury tax posture) along with links to other teams.

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key= ... 3SXc&gid=5

Post #2 » by **BigSlam** » Sat Jul 17, 2010 2:11 pm

So according to this we aer currently 7 mil over the cap - with a pretty average team and long term contracts?

Awesome!!

Post #3 » by **fatlever** » Sat Jul 17, 2010 2:16 pm

Mezotarkus wrote:Hey guys - may want to sticky this. The Google doc at the link below shows the Bobcats current salary cap position (including cap holds and luxury tax posture) along with links to other teams.

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key= ... 3SXc&gid=5

why is dwayne jones on there?

how much did we sign mcguire for?

did we ever get a clear answer on how much the first year of tt's contract is worth?

Mezotarkus · Post #4 » by **Mezotarkus** » Sat Jul 17, 2010 2:26 pm

fatlever wrote:
Mezotarkus wrote:Hey guys - may want to sticky this. The Google doc at the link below shows the Bobcats current salary cap position (including cap holds and luxury tax posture) along with links to other teams.

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key= ... 3SXc&gid=5

why is dwayne jones on there?

how much did we sign mcguire for?

did we ever get a clear answer on how much the first year of tt's contract is worth?

Jones is still on because he cleared waivers and players that cleared waivers stay on their team's cap figure. Of course, Jones contract was unguaranteed so ultimately the salary won't count against the cap figure I do not believe. Probably shouldn't be there but I think the algorithms used to assemble these figures need to be spruced up to hand players with unguaranteed contracts that clear waivers. Normally, once all the offseason hullabaloo has ended there's a manual review of the spreadsheets to clean them up of any glitches.

Post #5 » by **fatlever** » Sat Jul 17, 2010 2:31 pm

oh ok. i thought somebody got ahead of themselves last week during the diaw for jones rumors and just forgot to remove him. haha.

doc.end · Post #6 » by **doc.end** » Sat Jul 17, 2010 2:32 pm

fatlever wrote:
Mezotarkus wrote:Hey guys - may want to sticky this. The Google doc at the link below shows the Bobcats current salary cap position (including cap holds and luxury tax posture) along with links to other teams.

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key= ... 3SXc&gid=5

why is dwayne jones on there?

how much did we sign mcguire for?

did we ever get a clear answer on how much the first year of tt's contract is worth?

Becuase it sucks

Did we really sign McGuire? I don't think so.

I am bound to believe storytellerscontracts cause I don't know nothing better right now. One thing is sure - it is not frontloaded.

Vanderbilt_Grad · Post #7 » by **Vanderbilt_Grad** » Sat Jul 17, 2010 2:35 pm

That looks reasonably accurate to me ... but I'm a bit doubtful of the TT number. I think that his contract is going to be like Crash's ... 8 mil a year.

doc.end · Post #8 » by **doc.end** » Sat Jul 17, 2010 2:46 pm

From a glimpse of it.
- they have Crash's contract wrong, it is very probable bonuses kicked in and it should be 10.5 per
- no McGuire on our roster (yet?)
- no Dwayne Jones on our roster (yet?)
- we don't have Raja Bell trade exception anymore
- they already have Livingston here (albeit it is still pending and anthing can happen, well I won't question that this time) and and the same time they have us to have full MLE; can someone explain to me how we signed Shaun Livingston, we weren't under the cap right?

Post #9 » by **Diop** » Sat Jul 17, 2010 2:54 pm

we used Bell's TE to get Najera or Carroll, can't remember which one

doc.end · Post #10 » by **doc.end** » Sat Jul 17, 2010 3:33 pm

I don't understand yout point.

Post #11 » by **Diop** » Sat Jul 17, 2010 3:44 pm

sorry, misread your post

its late and im drunk

doc.end · Post #12 » by **doc.end** » Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:34 pm

No problem.) (Najera it was I think)

Post #13 » by **BigSlam** » Sat Jul 17, 2010 5:43 pm

Sachmo wrote:sorry, misread your post

its late and im drunk

Awesome post. The only thing missing from making it HoF was a third line that simply read:

"And naked"

ohara · Post #14 » by **ohara** » Sat Jul 17, 2010 6:03 pm

BigSlam wrote:
Sachmo wrote:sorry, misread your post

its late and im drunk

Awesome post. The only thing missing from making it HoF was a third line that simply read:

"And naked"

I think late, drunk and naked would have to describe me watching a game with this team as currently constituted. This is an ugly team right now, absent some changes. The FO better get to work, like yesterday.

Mezotarkus · Post #15 » by **Mezotarkus** » Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:37 pm

doc.end wrote:Becuase it sucks

Did we really sign McGuire? I don't think so.

I am bound to believe storytellerscontracts cause I don't know nothing better right now. One thing is sure - it is not frontloaded.

Everyone is guessing including storyteller.

doc.end · Post #16 » by **doc.end** » Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:02 pm

Of course.