Shannon Brown

Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS

User avatar
StocktonShorts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,386
And1: 2,551
Joined: Jun 02, 2009
   

Shannon Brown 

Post#1 » by StocktonShorts » Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:40 am

Now that Barnes has signed with the Lakers I doubt they'll be able to get Brown. Should the Jazz go after him? I kind of see him as a bigger, taller, longer Ronnie Price. I think he'd be an improvement.
User avatar
HammerDunk
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,126
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 27, 2008

Re: Shannon Brown 

Post#2 » by HammerDunk » Fri Jul 23, 2010 5:26 am

I would take him for real cheap. While he may be an improvement over Price, I think there is a major reason he hasn't been signed yet, and I don't think he will flourish in our system. That said, I would trade one for the other for sure.
Image
Word is, South Beach is ecstatic that they
won't be seeing Millsaps talents again this season...
User avatar
The59Sound
Head Coach
Posts: 6,363
And1: 917
Joined: Jul 01, 2010
   

Re: Shannon Brown 

Post#3 » by The59Sound » Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:16 pm

He ain't the sharpest tool in the shed, and a lot of Lakers fans seem to hate him, but I wouldn't kick him out of bed.
R-DAWG wrote:Look guys, no matter what happens we know Fegan is a man of his word and Dwight Howard doesn't change his mind once he makes a decision.

The Quantifiable Connection: An Interstellar fan site.
http://www.quantifiableconnection.com
User avatar
FJS
Senior Mod - Jazz
Senior Mod - Jazz
Posts: 18,793
And1: 2,162
Joined: Sep 19, 2002
Location: Barcelona, Spain
   

Re: Shannon Brown 

Post#4 » by FJS » Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:24 pm

He is not very regular... But he is better than Price, for sure.
Image
write4u
Freshman
Posts: 79
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 09, 2003

Re: Shannon Brown 

Post#5 » by write4u » Fri Jul 23, 2010 6:57 pm

What is the MAJOR REASON?

It does sound strange to me. They got rid of Farmar and Brown, and I rather have both of them than Barnes, especially that they are both young and have more upside. Basically, they signed Fisher to appease Kobe, and since both Brown and Farmar probably are better than Fisher at this stage, they let both of them go. And I don't think Blake is better than either of them, as well. Some people say Brown can't play point, but he has lots of ability that can be developed. Don't understand what the Lakers are thinking. Maybe Kobe has a lot to do with it.
Colby
Junior
Posts: 258
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 30, 2010

Re: Shannon Brown 

Post#6 » by Colby » Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:06 pm

Blake is pretty underrated. He's better than both Farmar and Brown, and it's not like picking up Barnes and Ratliff to add to their depth is a bad thing. Now they don't have to really deal with Walton.

Imagine how fiesty and annoying a lineup of Vujacic, Kobe, Barnes, Gasol, and Bynum would be. How the hell do you score against that lineup?

We're probably not getting past them this year still.
User avatar
HammerDunk
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,126
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 27, 2008

Re: Shannon Brown 

Post#7 » by HammerDunk » Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:16 pm

Barnes is overrated defensively. More of a paper tiger in my book.
Image
Word is, South Beach is ecstatic that they
won't be seeing Millsaps talents again this season...
MagicMamba88
Pro Prospect
Posts: 904
And1: 1,646
Joined: Aug 07, 2009
Location: California
 

Re: Shannon Brown 

Post#8 » by MagicMamba88 » Fri Jul 23, 2010 9:42 pm

Mike Trudell: http://twitter.com/LakersReporter
Kupchak added that the Lakers are still talking to Shannon Brown, and he's "optimistic" about re-signing Brown.


If the Lakers sign Brown and both 2nd rounders, Kupchak said he's comfortable with carrying 14 on the roster (13 last year).



From Kevin Ding - OC Register:

Mitch Kupchak was "optimistic" about Shannon Brown returning to the Lakers, and called [the signing of] Matt Barnes "insurance" because Luke Walton (back - nerve damage) might well miss next season.
Image
User avatar
Bullet
Junior
Posts: 308
And1: 18
Joined: Feb 06, 2010
 

Re: Shannon Brown 

Post#9 » by Bullet » Sat Jul 24, 2010 3:25 am

I'd sign Brown as a back-up SG and not PG. He, to me, can play Brewer's old role, cutting baseline and finishing with his athleticism.

But I'd rather give those minutes to Hayward.
User avatar
idajazz
Analyst
Posts: 3,385
And1: 139
Joined: Jan 08, 2002
     

Re: Shannon Brown 

Post#10 » by idajazz » Sat Jul 24, 2010 3:30 am

I will keep Price
User avatar
deadstock_bM
Starter
Posts: 2,499
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 23, 2010
Location: Chicago

Re: Shannon Brown 

Post#11 » by deadstock_bM » Sat Jul 24, 2010 5:27 am

Based on athleticism alone, this guy has a lot of potential if coached to his strengths. His jumpshot isn't as consistent but he isn't shy to shoot the 3. With the right amount of work from himself, he could be a great backup Point.
Jefff
Starter
Posts: 2,293
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 03, 2004
Location: Italy

Re: Shannon Brown 

Post#12 » by Jefff » Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:20 am

he's similar to price and we're already in the luxury tax territory. this means that arguably he won't find here more money nor playng time than in LA.
However, i like the guy, and i'd tender him a 3 year-8 millions offer.
NBA SINGS MORE JAZZ
User avatar
Reckless
Analyst
Posts: 3,540
And1: 564
Joined: May 21, 2007
   

Re: Shannon Brown 

Post#13 » by Reckless » Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:32 am

idajazz wrote:I will keep Price

I still find it funny people on Real GM think Price is a decent NBA backup PG.
Gerald3Wallace
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,794
And1: 99
Joined: Apr 12, 2007
Location: cali baby

Re: Shannon Brown 

Post#14 » by Gerald3Wallace » Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:44 am

write4u wrote:What is the MAJOR REASON?

It does sound strange to me. They got rid of Farmar and Brown, and I rather have both of them than Barnes, especially that they are both young and have more upside. Basically, they signed Fisher to appease Kobe, and since both Brown and Farmar probably are better than Fisher at this stage, they let both of them go. And I don't think Blake is better than either of them, as well. Some people say Brown can't play point, but he has lots of ability that can be developed. Don't understand what the Lakers are thinking. Maybe Kobe has a lot to do with it.


This is where you got it all wrong

Farmar and Brown are horrible.

Farmar is me first point guard, never looks to pass in the post, and takes some of the most questionable shots known to man. Sure hes athletic, but his bball iq is just not there, and he doesnt fit in at all in the triangle.

For brown, he played well his first year with us. He knew his role, played within the system. Then the 2nd year, seems like he just wanted a contract so he started doing things he knows he cant do. Such as over dribbling (horrible handles) and bad shot taker.

Blake is an improvement over both. And Barnes is better than both also.

ANd also, word is Shannon is asking for 4 to 5 million per season. Serious? What have you done to earn almost MLE type money? Unless hes open on a breakaway, hes pretty much useless.
User avatar
HammerDunk
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,126
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 27, 2008

Re: Shannon Brown 

Post#15 » by HammerDunk » Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:18 pm

Gerald3Wallace wrote:ANd also, word is Shannon is asking for 4 to 5 million per season. Serious? What have you done to earn almost MLE type money? Unless hes open on a breakaway, hes pretty much useless.

My thoughts exactly.
Image
Word is, South Beach is ecstatic that they
won't be seeing Millsaps talents again this season...

Return to Utah Jazz