No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
Moderators: Sleepy51, floppymoose, Chris Porter's Hair
No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
-
AdonalFoyle4Prez
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,156
- And1: 382
- Joined: Jul 14, 2006
No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
T-Mac's deal with the Bulls have slowly died down. Seems like the guy isn't getting many offers from others teams due to his history of injuries and underachieving in the league. If that's the case, do you guys think there's any chance the Warriors should sign him to the MLE/Veteran's Min? He can be 1/4 of the scoring option among Curry, Lee, and Ellis, he can really dish it out, and be our hero in the 4th quarter when the chance is there. He would be fortunate enough to know that he's still valued if we sign him and gets him motivated.
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
-
Amazing Curry
- Starter
- Posts: 2,441
- And1: 65
- Joined: Jul 10, 2010
-
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
Pass. He will collapse after a couple of runs down the court in our system. IMO, Cleveland should look into T-Mac because honestly, who do they have besides Mo Williams now? And while they're at it, they should sign Iverson and Shaq too. Just throwing stuff out there lol.
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
- Visigoth
- Starter
- Posts: 2,481
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 29, 2010
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
Amazing Curry wrote:Pass. He will collapse after a couple of runs down the court in our system. IMO, Cleveland should look into T-Mac because honestly, who do they have besides Mo Williams now? And while they're at it, they should sign Iverson and Shaq too. Just throwing stuff out there lol.
Yeah, who needs the Miami Big 3.
That's interesting actually. Prime Lebron-Wade-Bosh vs. Prime Shaq-AI-McGrady... who ya got?
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
-
Amazing Curry
- Starter
- Posts: 2,441
- And1: 65
- Joined: Jul 10, 2010
-
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
Visigoth wrote:Amazing Curry wrote:Pass. He will collapse after a couple of runs down the court in our system. IMO, Cleveland should look into T-Mac because honestly, who do they have besides Mo Williams now? And while they're at it, they should sign Iverson and Shaq too. Just throwing stuff out there lol.
Yeah, who needs the Miami Big 3.
That's interesting actually. Prime Lebron-Wade-Bosh vs. Prime Shaq-AI-McGrady... who ya got?
Let's not even talk about primes. If Cleveland really do sign those 3 and they somehow have some gas left in the tank, I feel like they might be able to compete with Miami. Cleveland has a deeper bench than Miami, and I don't think it's wise to play the Miami 3 40+ mpg each game.
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
-
St.Nick
- Banned User
- Posts: 15,954
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jun 21, 2004
- Location: Paris, France
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
It seems like he's garnering interest but then gets examined by team doctors who give him a big thumbs down.
No team wants to spend a couple million on a guy that will miss 60 games, perhaps with a superstar attitude to boot.
McGrady is becoming the TO of the NBA.
No team wants to spend a couple million on a guy that will miss 60 games, perhaps with a superstar attitude to boot.
McGrady is becoming the TO of the NBA.
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
- KR4
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,059
- And1: 11
- Joined: Jul 13, 2005
- Location: Capitola, CA
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
At least TO plays in the games
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
- Tommy Udo 6
- Global Mod

- Posts: 42,507
- And1: 28
- Joined: Jun 13, 2003
- Location: San Francisco/East Bay CA
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
TMac's workout was private - so no one knows except team officials if he still has skills other than shooting the ball.
However, Bulls clearly want TMac to be a reserve & to have no problem with it.
Yet, it was TMac & his people who revealed the workout and TMac turned it into a media circus. This is not what the Bulls wanted. It seems obvious that "Me Mac" is still alive & I dont think the Bulls (and most teams) want any part of that.
However, Bulls clearly want TMac to be a reserve & to have no problem with it.
Yet, it was TMac & his people who revealed the workout and TMac turned it into a media circus. This is not what the Bulls wanted. It seems obvious that "Me Mac" is still alive & I dont think the Bulls (and most teams) want any part of that.
The gem cannot be polished without friction, nor man perfected without trials.
- -- Chinese proverb
- -- Chinese proverb
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
- KR4
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,059
- And1: 11
- Joined: Jul 13, 2005
- Location: Capitola, CA
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
I know I wouldn't touch him with a ten foot pole.
The fact that the Rockets did better without him in the last few seasons is telling.
The fact that the Rockets did better without him in the last few seasons is telling.
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
-
sanddude909
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,296
- And1: 0
- Joined: Mar 06, 2005
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
Visigoth wrote:Amazing Curry wrote:Pass. He will collapse after a couple of runs down the court in our system. IMO, Cleveland should look into T-Mac because honestly, who do they have besides Mo Williams now? And while they're at it, they should sign Iverson and Shaq too. Just throwing stuff out there lol.
Yeah, who needs the Miami Big 3.
That's interesting actually. Prime Lebron-Wade-Bosh vs. Prime Shaq-AI-McGrady... who ya got?
Prime Shaq when motivated is so much better than Prime Bosh that he would compensate for the AI/McGrady versus Wade/Lebron matchup.
Assuming the rest of the squads are equal, I'll take Prime Shaq / AI / McGrady every time.
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
-
toffee1
- Banned User
- Posts: 539
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jun 19, 2008
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
sanddude909 wrote:Visigoth wrote:Amazing Curry wrote:Pass. He will collapse after a couple of runs down the court in our system. IMO, Cleveland should look into T-Mac because honestly, who do they have besides Mo Williams now? And while they're at it, they should sign Iverson and Shaq too. Just throwing stuff out there lol.
Yeah, who needs the Miami Big 3.
That's interesting actually. Prime Lebron-Wade-Bosh vs. Prime Shaq-AI-McGrady... who ya got?
Prime Shaq when motivated is so much better than Prime Bosh that he would compensate for the AI/McGrady versus Wade/Lebron matchup.
Assuming the rest of the squads are equal, I'll take Prime Shaq / AI / McGrady every time.
+1
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
- methdefense
- Senior
- Posts: 683
- And1: 4
- Joined: Jul 06, 2010
- Location: Where Tanking Happens
- Contact:
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
Isn't it great? Dubs could have one more addition to their infirmary.

You just came up with a theory, convinced yourself it was true, and then presented it as a fact. You have no proof whatsoever that this is what they did or what they are thinking.
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
-
Sleepy51
- Forum Mod - Warriors

- Posts: 35,709
- And1: 2,331
- Joined: Jun 28, 2005
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
If his workout and med exam with the Bulls went well enough that they really did want him as a backup, and it's only the "role" issue that fouled things, then the W's should take a look if they can do it on a short term contract. The reality is, we do not have a starting SF. If he passed the bulls physical then we should be taking a serious look.
Jester_ wrote:Can we trade Draymond Green for Grayson Allen?
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
- Coxy
- RealGM
- Posts: 48,581
- And1: 15,031
- Joined: Jun 17, 2008
-
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
Bad idea.
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
- and1GS
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,386
- And1: 2,728
- Joined: Nov 12, 2008
- Location: home of 4x champs, 1x AS starter, supporter of checkbook wins and all-time weakest moves
-
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
Visigoth wrote:Amazing Curry wrote:Pass. He will collapse after a couple of runs down the court in our system. IMO, Cleveland should look into T-Mac because honestly, who do they have besides Mo Williams now? And while they're at it, they should sign Iverson and Shaq too. Just throwing stuff out there lol.
Yeah, who needs the Miami Big 3.
That's interesting actually. Prime Lebron-Wade-Bosh vs. Prime Shaq-AI-McGrady... who ya got?
That's interesting because while Bron/Wade are fantastic passers and playmakers McGrady/AI are not in any way good passers. They got "**** I'm triple teamed" assists and "**** why'd I drive inside, BAIL OUT PASS TYME!" dimes. Shaq/Bosh are also really different players as well...Shaq demands the ball and Bosh doesn't.
I don't think Shaq/AI/McG would work just because it has two of the biggest volume shooters I've ever seen in my life. THATS a situation where the "only one ball" argument makes sense.
"The dynasty doesn't start with you, it starts after you"
KevinMcreynolds wrote:hopefully JK laid some pipe on the strip as well, gotta get those reps in
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
- cladden
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,522
- And1: 441
- Joined: Oct 13, 2006
-
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
and1GS wrote:Visigoth wrote:Amazing Curry wrote:Pass. He will collapse after a couple of runs down the court in our system. IMO, Cleveland should look into T-Mac because honestly, who do they have besides Mo Williams now? And while they're at it, they should sign Iverson and Shaq too. Just throwing stuff out there lol.
Yeah, who needs the Miami Big 3.
That's interesting actually. Prime Lebron-Wade-Bosh vs. Prime Shaq-AI-McGrady... who ya got?
That's interesting because while Bron/Wade are fantastic passers and playmakers McGrady/AI are not in any way good passers. They got "**** I'm triple teamed" assists and "**** why'd I drive inside, BAIL OUT PASS TYME!" dimes. Shaq/Bosh are also really different players as well...Shaq demands the ball and Bosh doesn't.
I don't think Shaq/AI/McG would work just because it has two of the biggest volume shooters I've ever seen in my life. THATS a situation where the "only one ball" argument makes sense.
I think you're being very rough on AI and McGrady's passing here. They're both very able passers IMO. They've both been top dogs for most of their careers but have always had high assist numbers (of course partially due to dominating the ball).
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
- and1GS
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,386
- And1: 2,728
- Joined: Nov 12, 2008
- Location: home of 4x champs, 1x AS starter, supporter of checkbook wins and all-time weakest moves
-
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
They're able passers, but not good playmakers. AI passed cause he was tripled, it was obvious he wanted to shoot, shoot, shoot...same with T-Mac in his Orlando days.
LeBron has a PG mindset and is one of the best passers in the NBA. Wade also has that PG instinct, though not at Bron's level...that wasn't apparent in T-Mac/AI. High assist numbers don't always mean you're a great passer...by that logic Monta is one of the best playmakers in the NBA.
LeBron has a PG mindset and is one of the best passers in the NBA. Wade also has that PG instinct, though not at Bron's level...that wasn't apparent in T-Mac/AI. High assist numbers don't always mean you're a great passer...by that logic Monta is one of the best playmakers in the NBA.
"The dynasty doesn't start with you, it starts after you"
KevinMcreynolds wrote:hopefully JK laid some pipe on the strip as well, gotta get those reps in
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
- old rem
- RealGM
- Posts: 50,753
- And1: 1,080
- Joined: Jun 14, 2005
- Location: Witness Protection
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
AdonalFoyle4Prez wrote:T-Mac's deal with the Bulls have slowly died down. Seems like the guy isn't getting many offers from others teams due to his history of injuries and underachieving in the league. If that's the case, do you guys think there's any chance the Warriors should sign him to the MLE/Veteran's Min? He can be 1/4 of the scoring option among Curry, Lee, and Ellis, he can really dish it out, and be our hero in the 4th quarter when the chance is there. He would be fortunate enough to know that he's still valued if we sign him and gets him motivated.
Outdated
BEST CASE.....he's a usable backup with no future on a team in serious need of a FUTURE....having blown away the one they had. The Knicks and Bulls,so far,have seen NO sign of the original t Mac.
He no longer seems to care,waste of a roster spot.
The player you describe.....is history.
CENSORED... No comment.
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
- realfung
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,960
- And1: 44
- Joined: May 22, 2007
-
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
Amazing Curry wrote:Pass. He will collapse after a couple of runs down the court in our system. IMO, Cleveland should look into T-Mac because honestly, who do they have besides Mo Williams now? And while they're at it, they should sign Iverson and Shaq too. Just throwing stuff out there lol.
they have jamison and SHAQ.....
but you are right, who else.
T-Mac is a big risk, like Yao Ming, but high risk high return and fail.
Teams like him but the real question is T-Mac has to accept the reserve role, like 15 minutes behind Deng or Brewer.
Warriors should take him and off the bench too.
Our main guys are still Monta and Curry.
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
- and1GS
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,386
- And1: 2,728
- Joined: Nov 12, 2008
- Location: home of 4x champs, 1x AS starter, supporter of checkbook wins and all-time weakest moves
-
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
T-Mac is like AI...he will NEVER be cool with a reserve role. if you make him a reserve he'll act like he's supposed to be the team superstar whenever he's in the game.
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
- don nelson
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,494
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jul 20, 2008
Re: No one wants T-Mac, but do the Dubs?
and1GS wrote:T-Mac is like AI...he will NEVER be cool with a reserve role. if you make him a reserve he'll act like he's supposed to be the team superstar whenever he's in the game.
Actually T-Mac would absolutely demand to be treated like the MVP player in his imagination. Here's an excerpt from ESPN's Marc Stein on why the Bulls are hesitant about signing T-Mac:
Sources close to the process, as they did Monday after McGrady’s workout and sit-down with team officials, continue to describe the prospect of a T-Mac signing as “unlikely” after he spoke at length -- to the media and apparently those officials as well -- of his intent to try to force his way into a prominent role with the Bulls when they were looking for him to show a blanket willingness to accept a limited role.
If the Bulls ultimately do relent and commit to a T-Mac experiment, since they do need another scoring threat on the perimeter, it’s believed that they will insist on McGrady accepting a non-guaranteed deal for next season so they can let him go at any time without financial hesitation if they deem the experiment to be failing.
Return to Golden State Warriors














