dk7th wrote:basaglia wrote:
you miss the point of the post. crawford and randolph are LOSERS. .
but amare isn't?
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
dk7th wrote:basaglia wrote:
you miss the point of the post. crawford and randolph are LOSERS. .

basaglia wrote:but amare isn't?

basaglia wrote:omerome wrote:BECAUSE WE ALREADY HAD HIM VERBALLY COMMIT TO OUR TEAM!
You're deluding yourself. Chicago could have offered. They didnt.
basaglia wrote:dk7th wrote:basaglia wrote:
you miss the point of the post. crawford and randolph are LOSERS. .
but amare isn't?
basaglia wrote:dk7th wrote:basaglia wrote:
you miss the point of the post. crawford and randolph are LOSERS. .
but amare isn't?



duetta wrote:basaglia wrote:but amare isn't?
When has he lost?
basaglia wrote:duetta wrote:basaglia wrote:but amare isn't?
When has he lost?
every year he's been in the L...just like randolph and crawford.

basaglia wrote:every year he's been in the L...just like randolph and crawford.
basaglia wrote:
after TWO YEARS...it was for NO REASON. just like you're tryna say walsh is being critiqued by me after two years FOR NO REASON.
isiah's failures and success are a matter of record. i ain't gotta list them for you. he drafted some good players and made some bad trades. that's it, in short. he gave donnie a better start than layden gave him. isiah was gonna be over the cap for three years if he hadn't done ONE THING starting from dec. 2003. he could have just thrown that old man garbage out there FOR YEARS (spoon, dyess, ward, eisley, etc) and just drafted and he STILL would have been over the cap. donnie didn't have to START there. donnie had young pieces and expiring contracts coming off RIGHT AWAY.
seren wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Now I am convinced you are Isiah. This is exactly what he used to say when he was the GM here. Comparing his 23 win seasons to conference finalists.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
?
stuporman wrote:These trolls aren't worth the effort. I'm embarrassed I even gave them a real response. They'll slink back into the shadows and under the rocks where they came from as soon enough never to have to answer to their irrational statements and hateful attitudes. Only to return under another name to troll again. These are the worst type of pathetic trolls that there are. Cowards.
There's more and more popping up with a handful of posts yet signed up years ago. That is planned trolling, they knew they were going to get banned for their baiting and trolling so they made other names before their banishment so it wouldn't look like it was the same poster returning. These posters are losers of the worst kind.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
basaglia wrote:duetta wrote:basaglia wrote:but amare isn't?
When has he lost?
every year he's been in the L...just like randolph and crawford.
waxtermite wrote:
You really need to take this mess back to okaysports.
