King of Troy wrote:This thread makes no sense.
Why would people create AIDS for wealth? What is the benefit of killing those who are poor and can't afford medicine? I could see infecting the rich so that you can make a huge killing in pharmaceuticals, but that doesn't exactly make any sense for killing off the poor. There isn't really any correlation there.
Anyone can make grand statements, but can you logically back any of them up?
In the 1950's the black to white population in South Africa was >15:1, now it is 10:1. 95% of Black South Africans live in poverty while less than 1% of White South Africans live in poverty. The average white household income is 8 times the average Black South African household income. Nearly .8million will die from AIDS in South Africa this year alone, only .3% are White, nearly all others are indigenous blacks. Nearly 40% of all black pregnant women are affected with HIV. South Africa is the most mineral and natural resourced region on the entire planet. Nearly 90% of it population is still black, inspite of the millons of deaths from AIDS. The blacks that make up nearly 90% of the population control less than .5% of the nations resources/wealth.
These statistics have to be researched and consolidated from a number of sources. The obvious ridiculous nature of this situation is pathetic. How is inequality in both wealth and suffering of this magnitude acceptable? It is not acceptable, it is simply a function of greed and hatred. HIV/AIDS is a weapon.























