sunsfan3 wrote:http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=29b2598
im down? u down?
either hill or Duds. i'll go with both.
how about J Rich+ Warrick for Dwight Howard
Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
sunsfan3 wrote:http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=29b2598
im down? u down?
either hill or Duds. i'll go with both.
KayZee wrote:sunsfan3 wrote:http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=29b2598
im down? u down?
either hill or Duds. i'll go with both.
how about J Rich+ Warrick for Dwight Howard
MrMiyagi wrote:Lob to DA for the win
binkar wrote:BurningHeart wrote:If he came, we'd be a contender. He's fine if its just for a few minutes.
I'd rather throw Jones in there for rebounding purposes, but he's still otherwise raw offensively.
I am really confused by this post.
So if he came we would be a contender. This implies Dampier is the missing link for us being a contender.
Then he is fine for just a few minutes. So does a few minutes of "fine" Dampier make us a contender?
Then you would rather play Jones, who is already on the roster. If he is better than Dampier, wouldn't this mean we are already a contender?
Throughout your post, you went from:
1) Dampier being the missing link to a potential championship.
2) Dampier being ok, if it's just for a few minutes.
3) Dampier not even being an upgrade at all.
Which is it?
SUN wrote:Give us Dampier. He's like a better Jamal Magloire, he rebounds, a big body down low and can play D.
It's an indication of where the NBA is today that teams like the Miami HEAT, Phoenix Suns, Toronto Raptors, Philadelphia 76ers, and even Houston Rockets are all expressing interest (Houston has a two-year, $4 million offer on the table) in Dampier, who couldn't have held David Robinson's sweaty gym shorts.
Kerrsed wrote:It's an indication of where the NBA is today that teams like the Miami HEAT, Phoenix Suns, Toronto Raptors, Philadelphia 76ers, and even Houston Rockets are all expressing interest (Houston has a two-year, $4 million offer on the table) in Dampier, who couldn't have held David Robinson's sweaty gym shorts.
http://www.hoopsworld.com/Story.asp?story_id=17340
nashrambler13 wrote:I'm sorry to even bring this up, but if we were to get Dampier, would it be a half-decent idea to tell Hill that he'll probably never play and Start Hedo at SF?
Nash/Dragic/Janning/Hill
JRich/JChill/Hill/Janning
Hedo/Dudley/Hill/Clark
Frye/Warrick/Lawal/Clark
Lopez/Dampier/Jones/Lawal
I LOVE Hill, but we can't make him leave... I understand he's probably to talented and servicable for that but... it makes sense right?
WTFsunsFTW wrote:There is no way we go past the trade deadline this year with the same squad.
nashrambler13 wrote:I'm sorry to even bring this up, but if we were to get Dampier, would it be a half-decent idea to tell Hill that he'll probably never play and Start Hedo at SF?
Nash/Dragic/Janning/Hill
JRich/JChill/Hill/Janning
Hedo/Dudley/Hill/Clark
Frye/Warrick/Lawal/Clark
Lopez/Dampier/Jones/Lawal
I LOVE Hill, but we can't make him leave... I understand he's probably to talented and servicable for that but... it makes sense right?
WTFsunsFTW wrote:Yeah lets bench Hill in his last season, after his best season in a decade..
rsavaj wrote:nashrambler13 wrote:I'm sorry to even bring this up, but if we were to get Dampier, would it be a half-decent idea to tell Hill that he'll probably never play and Start Hedo at SF?
Nash/Dragic/Janning/Hill
JRich/JChill/Hill/Janning
Hedo/Dudley/Hill/Clark
Frye/Warrick/Lawal/Clark
Lopez/Dampier/Jones/Lawal
I LOVE Hill, but we can't make him leave... I understand he's probably to talented and servicable for that but... it makes sense right?
Hill is going to remain a starter unless Dudley or Clark go into beast mode.
NYK 455 wrote:You guys need a 5 that can rebound and defend the interior well, Damp can do both. Honestly, if you guys made a play for David Lee and signed Dampier, I think you guys would have been serious contenders.
Kerrsed wrote:NYK 455 wrote:You guys need a 5 that can rebound and defend the interior well, Damp can do both. Honestly, if you guys made a play for David Lee and signed Dampier, I think you guys would have been serious contenders.
Please dont mention David Lee on our forum. Its a sore subject. We wanted him in exchange for Amare. Alot of us have/had hard-ons for Lee.![]()