Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 6 PM, (BYOP)
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 6 PM, (BYOP)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,772
- And1: 22,354
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 6 PM, (BYOP)
I was thinking about how excited I am to see George and Stephenson. Then I looked at their stats...
George - 2.3 ppg, .143 FG%, .143 FG% (21.7 mpg)
Stephenson - 4 ppg, .286 FG%, .167 3FG% (13.7 mpg)
By comparison...
Johnson - 10.5 ppg, .727 FG%, .800 3FG% (21.5 mpg)
George - 2.3 ppg, .143 FG%, .143 FG% (21.7 mpg)
Stephenson - 4 ppg, .286 FG%, .167 3FG% (13.7 mpg)
By comparison...
Johnson - 10.5 ppg, .727 FG%, .800 3FG% (21.5 mpg)
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
- Foye
- Club Captain- German Soccer
- Posts: 25,061
- And1: 3,613
- Joined: Jul 29, 2008
- Location: Frankfurt
-
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
Klomp wrote:I was thinking about how excited I am to see George and Stephenson. Then I looked at their stats...
George - 2.3 ppg, .143 FG%, .143 FG% (21.7 mpg)
Stephenson - 4 ppg, .286 FG%, .167 3FG% (13.7 mpg)
By comparison...
Johnson - 10.5 ppg, .727 FG%, .800 3FG% (21.5 mpg)
Lol those FG% are horrible. W4 has been a great so far. He takes only high percentage looks and converts them.
I was excited to read the Nuggets game thread against us. Then I realized they did not have one.

Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
- wolfbourne
- Sophomore
- Posts: 175
- And1: 0
- Joined: Sep 27, 2010
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
Foye wrote:I was excited to read the Nuggets game thread against us. Then I realized they did not have one.
Ditto, but i guess being pre-season and all, and playing the Wolves and all, and being Denver with Anderson, Martin and Billups out and all, it really just didn't count enough to warrant one.
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
-
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves
- Posts: 27,361
- And1: 12,220
- Joined: Dec 27, 2003
-
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
Klomp wrote:I was thinking about how excited I am to see George and Stephenson. Then I looked at their stats...
George - 2.3 ppg, .143 FG%, .143 FG% (21.7 mpg)
Stephenson - 4 ppg, .286 FG%, .167 3FG% (13.7 mpg)
By comparison...
Johnson - 10.5 ppg, .727 FG%, .800 3FG% (21.5 mpg)
Take a deep breath and say to yourself "It's only the preseason". It would be great if our preseason play is indicative of our actual talent level, but it doesn't always work that way.
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,004
- And1: 6,020
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
maybe not indicative of the talent, but it seems to be indicative of play style, which is athletic and intense.

Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,741
- And1: 1,177
- Joined: Jan 02, 2008
- Location: St. Paul
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
Whatever, we are still the NBA champions.
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
- ...
- Junior
- Posts: 434
- And1: 122
- Joined: Sep 24, 2007
-
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
Anyone know if this is on TV at all? Can't imagine it is.
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,772
- And1: 22,354
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
... wrote:Anyone know if this is on TV at all? Can't imagine it is.
Not in MN.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
- ...
- Junior
- Posts: 434
- And1: 122
- Joined: Sep 24, 2007
-
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
Klomp wrote:... wrote:Anyone know if this is on TV at all? Can't imagine it is.
Not in MN.
Yeah. I don't know what I was thinking on that one.
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,741
- And1: 1,177
- Joined: Jan 02, 2008
- Location: St. Paul
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
I thought it was going to be on FSN?
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,755
- And1: 13
- Joined: Sep 16, 2010
- Location: Minnesota
-
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
http://blogs.twincities.com/timberwolve ... essiv.html By Ray Richardson
Even if it is only pre-season, this is what I like to see.
Heading into tonight's game at Indiana, the Wolves lead the NBA in scoring (113.0) and three-point shooting (.531). They rank second in assists (23.7) and blocked shots (7.3), third in rebounding percentage (.539) and fourth in forcing turnovers (22.3).
Even if it is only pre-season, this is what I like to see.

Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,772
- And1: 22,354
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
funkatron101 wrote:I thought it was going to be on FSN?
Thats next weeks game vs Indy at home
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,772
- And1: 22,354
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
JerryZgoda #Timberwolves going with same starting 5 tonite in Indy: Ridnour, Brew, Beasley, Darko and Love. 6 minutes ago from Twitter · FLAG
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
So no pie tonight?
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,772
- And1: 22,354
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 7 PM, (BYOP)
Krapinsky wrote:So no pie tonight?
BYOP = Bring Your Own Pie
...but I would guess there will be none.
Heads up, game starts at 6, not 7 (oops, my bad)
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 6 PM, (BYOP)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,772
- And1: 22,354
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 6 PM, (BYOP)
My pie will be ready in 20 minutes
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 6 PM, (BYOP)
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 6 PM, (BYOP)
I'm predicting a 30 point blow out win.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 6 PM, (BYOP)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,772
- And1: 22,354
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 6 PM, (BYOP)
No TV, No Radio, this sucks
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 6 PM, (BYOP)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,772
- And1: 22,354
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 6 PM, (BYOP)
If you have LP Broadband, you can get the Indy radio feed.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 6 PM, (BYOP)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,772
- And1: 22,354
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Wolves v Pacers, Wed, 6 PM, (BYOP)
Shooting 3-11 to start. Make that 4-12 after a Brewer 3
11-10 IND, 7 mins left
11-10 IND, 7 mins left
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves