ImageImage

Postgame: Week 8

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
chuckleslove
RealGM
Posts: 18,566
And1: 1,128
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
Location: In an RV down by the river
Contact:
     

Re: Postgame: Week 8 

Post#81 » by chuckleslove » Mon Nov 1, 2010 4:50 am

I thought Keller was down by contact on that play, but they were out of challenges and that first challenge Rex wasted was a stupid challenge so I feel no pity for them. I understand why he made the second challenge and why it couldn't be overturned but the first challenge was McCarthy-like.
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: Postgame: Week 8 

Post#82 » by El Duderino » Mon Nov 1, 2010 5:24 am

xTitan wrote:until Mike McCarthy realizes his receiving corp is average, this team will contiue to struggle, the terrible play of the TE's is going to be a major story moving forward as well.


I agree that the receiving core minus Finley isn't as good as some media folks/announcers imply, but i would say they are a little above average, just not elite.

As for McCarthy, he doesn't exactly have much of choice but to be very pass heavy in his play calling. It's either rely heavily on Rodgers, Jennings, Driver if healthy, Jones, and Nelson or rely quite a bit more on Jackson and Kuhn. I'll grant that Jackson has a nice 4.5ypc average and there have been games like Washington especially where i felt that McCarthy should have used the run game more, but i seriously question if he tried running the ball significantly more that it would be really effective.

One reason i think Jackson has been able to average that 4.5ypc is that defenses are almost always playing pass. They are usually keeping both safeties back and more of a nickle look. Quite a few of Jackson's 10 plus yard runs came from a shotgun look by us/draw plays. It not all that often that we line up in the I-formation and can play effective power football. That's why when MM calls that formation and instead tries play action, defenses rarely bite on it.

Without both Finley and Grant, it's removed so much of what made the offense explosive. With Grant, defenses often enough would bite on play action. With Finley, he regularly drew the attention of a safety in the middle of the field because linebackers alone couldn't cover him. Now those safeties stay back to double our receivers and thus take away much of our deep passing game and last year we were a top team in pass plays over 20 yards.

Losing one of Grant or Finley would obviously have hurt, but losing both has been a brutal blow to the offense.
ACGB
RealGM
Posts: 10,714
And1: 2,813
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Location: 414
 

Re: Postgame: Week 8 

Post#83 » by ACGB » Mon Nov 1, 2010 6:42 am

TKF wrote:everyone knows rogers is a fraud and the packers are not that good



a little comic relief from everyone's favorite moderator
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,807
And1: 27,383
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Postgame: Week 8 

Post#84 » by trwi7 » Mon Nov 1, 2010 6:51 am

ACGB wrote:
TKF wrote:everyone knows rogers is a fraud and the packers are not that good



a little comic relief from everyone's favorite moderator


I already posted that in the game thread, n00b. :D
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
ACGB
RealGM
Posts: 10,714
And1: 2,813
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Location: 414
 

Re: Postgame: Week 8 

Post#85 » by ACGB » Mon Nov 1, 2010 7:13 am

trwi7 wrote:
ACGB wrote:
TKF wrote:everyone knows rogers is a fraud and the packers are not that good



a little comic relief from everyone's favorite moderator


I already posted that in the game thread, n00b. :D

you win some you lose some 8-)
Flames24Rulz
Head Coach
Posts: 6,406
And1: 343
Joined: Dec 23, 2004
Location: Rockford, IL
       

Re: Postgame: Week 8 

Post#86 » by Flames24Rulz » Mon Nov 1, 2010 1:11 pm

We beat the Eagles 6-3 at Lambeau in 2000 for the Sherminator's first win as our coach.
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: Postgame: Week 8 

Post#87 » by Newz » Mon Nov 1, 2010 1:18 pm

This was an amazing game by the whole defense.

Raji, Matthews and Williams are all great. Those guys should be the major pieces of this defense for another 5 or more years.

Peprah has been playing great (Do you still think him and Derrick Martin are the same guy, Luke? ;) ), Woodson is starting to make some plays again, Collins is a Pro Bowl level player still... And the rest of our guys are doing our job.

Also, how the hell did the Jets let that NT that we picked up go? That dude is massive... He played very well and seems like he will always be a force in the running game.

Oh yeah... Desmond Bishop is a legit starter.
zmanishere11
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,884
And1: 279
Joined: May 20, 2002
Location: WI

Re: Postgame: Week 8 

Post#88 » by zmanishere11 » Mon Nov 1, 2010 1:48 pm

[quote="GrendonJennings"]Ladies and Gentlemen, I present to you the worst highlight of all time:

http://www.packers.com/media-center/videos/NFL-GameDay-Packers-vs-Jets-Highlights/a9f116bc-fc0c-46fb-a55d-0b536903d62b

Zero offensive highlights from the winning team (yes, I realize they didn't do a ton). All commentators seem to hope and assume the Jets win.

[quote]

Unreal. I guess they should change the name of the NFL network to the NY football coverage network.

I suppose it makes sense - GB wasn't supposed to have a chance in this game and NYJ were supposedly the best team in the league.
User avatar
Wade-A-Holic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,055
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 09, 2003

Re: Postgame: Week 8 

Post#89 » by Wade-A-Holic » Mon Nov 1, 2010 4:57 pm

GrendonJennings wrote:And the "horrible call" on Keller getting it taken away for an INT by Woodson.


With that call and the Tramon call, it occured to me that the NFL's rule regarding simultaneous catches (ie offensive player wins the "tie") completely contradicts its rule regarding completing the process of the catch.

Return to Green Bay Packers