Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
-
- Senior
- Posts: 505
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 25, 2008
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,627
- And1: 114
- Joined: May 27, 2010
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
Based on games 1 and 2, absolutely...
Greene has been 100% ineffective.
Casspi has been playing well, but Garcia has clearly been a LOT better.
Garcia is playing as well as ever. If Westphal is about earning minutes rather than grooming the young guys for the future, he'll start Garcia. But what his priorities are right now is unclear.
Greene has been 100% ineffective.
Casspi has been playing well, but Garcia has clearly been a LOT better.
Garcia is playing as well as ever. If Westphal is about earning minutes rather than grooming the young guys for the future, he'll start Garcia. But what his priorities are right now is unclear.
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 764
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 05, 2006
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
heck yea...i never knew why it was a question between casspi and greene. BUt when I see Cisco come off bench, I feel so confident that the team is going to do better, so not sure if that means he shoudl be 6th man.
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
- longfellow44
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,031
- And1: 241
- Joined: May 04, 2007
- Location: Washinton DC
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
Im not sure i want to start garcia, he's good but investing in him over the young guys seems like its counter productive to the longterm success of our franchise.
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
- pillwenney
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 48,887
- And1: 2,603
- Joined: Sep 19, 2004
- Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
- Contact:
-
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
Based off of what has happened so far, yes and no. I mean he has clearly been world's better than Casspi and Donte so far, but we're also only 2 games into the season. What I'd like to see is Westphal stick to something for more than 3 games at a time and continue to stick with it even if it's not working immediately.
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 42
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 26, 2010
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
From what I've seen in the first 2 games this is how I would distribute the minutes (until dally is 100%):
PG Beno 28/ Tyreke 10
SG Tyreke 28/ Garcia 15/ Greene 5
SF Casspi 25/ Garcia 15/ Greene 8
PF Landry 30/ Thompson 10/ Jackson 8
C Cousins 22/ Thompson 12/ Dally 10/ Jackson 4
i think thats a solid rotation
PG Beno 28/ Tyreke 10
SG Tyreke 28/ Garcia 15/ Greene 5
SF Casspi 25/ Garcia 15/ Greene 8
PF Landry 30/ Thompson 10/ Jackson 8
C Cousins 22/ Thompson 12/ Dally 10/ Jackson 4
i think thats a solid rotation
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
- KingInExile
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 14,416
- And1: 4
- Joined: May 25, 2004
- Location: RIP Wayman Tisdale...You left us way too early.
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
I still like Garcia much better as a 6th man coming off the bench. It doesn't matter who starts, it matters who finishes and gets more time on the floor. Garcia plays much better as a utility backcourt player and provides the spark off the bench that we had with Bobby Jackson. I really envision Garcia as a blend of B-Jax and Doug Christie (without the psycho wife). And that blend is better suited as a 6th man.
Garcia should only start if Greene or Casspi are hurt...and even then I might start Wright.
Garcia should only start if Greene or Casspi are hurt...and even then I might start Wright.
This space needs to be filled with a new sig...but I'm too lazy to make one.
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
- Wolfay
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 7,656
- And1: 649
- Joined: Aug 13, 2005
- Location: Sacramento, CA
-
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
I don't know. Personally, I see Garcia more as a 2 who can bring up the ball than a 3.
I am SO GLAD that he's finally hitting his groove. We all knew he was good, but there was always something getting in the way of his development, whether it be general team turmoil, injuries, or what have you. FInally he can start a season without all that crap.
I am SO GLAD that he's finally hitting his groove. We all knew he was good, but there was always something getting in the way of his development, whether it be general team turmoil, injuries, or what have you. FInally he can start a season without all that crap.
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,085
- And1: 1,084
- Joined: Feb 19, 2005
- Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
PG: Tyreke
SG: Cisco
SF: Wright or Omri
PF: Landry
C: Cousins
Beno, JT, Daly, Head, and Donte off the bench.
This is the best lineup we can put out there on the floor. Shooting won't be a problem, plenty of ball handlers, and we can capitalize on our size advantage.
SG: Cisco
SF: Wright or Omri
PF: Landry
C: Cousins
Beno, JT, Daly, Head, and Donte off the bench.
This is the best lineup we can put out there on the floor. Shooting won't be a problem, plenty of ball handlers, and we can capitalize on our size advantage.
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
-
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 25,434
- And1: 5,537
- Joined: Jul 28, 2006
-
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
I think Cicso deserves the start at the 2. Put Beno in the second unit with Cousins, Thompson & co.
Cisco is probably the Kings best perimeter defender and long range shooter as well. He will open lanes for Tyreke due to his shooting prowess.
Cisco is probably the Kings best perimeter defender and long range shooter as well. He will open lanes for Tyreke due to his shooting prowess.
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,085
- And1: 1,084
- Joined: Feb 19, 2005
- Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
+1000
Stick Daly up front with Cousins too. Beno/Landry would be a sick bench.
Stick Daly up front with Cousins too. Beno/Landry would be a sick bench.

Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
-
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 25,434
- And1: 5,537
- Joined: Jul 28, 2006
-
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
I was digging the Evans/Cisco/Casspi/Cousins/Dalembert lineup last night.
Come on PW!
Come on PW!
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
-
- Senior
- Posts: 505
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 25, 2008
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
yup i agree. tyreke, cisco, casspi, cousins, dally. beno, landry can share 6th man rolls. someone please teach cousins to play defense with his feet and not his hands. jt too. move your ass and quit grabbing people and getting tikky tak fouls. cousins needs to be more agressive offensivly too. more in the post though, only shoot outside if wide open.
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,085
- And1: 1,084
- Joined: Feb 19, 2005
- Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
I think Cousins is starting to settle in a little defensively. He's starting to rack up some blocks at least. Not a defensive force by far but it's growth. Not to make an excuse but I think the rookie calls all throughout preseason and early on have really shattered his confidence on that end of the floor. It's almost like he's afraid to even do anything at times. It's getting better though, hopefully that trend continues.
I really hope Westphal goes further into developing that lineup. Sure, there may be times where it's not as effective as others but in terms of skillset there really isn't anything it can't do. Set it free, and let it grow!
I really hope Westphal goes further into developing that lineup. Sure, there may be times where it's not as effective as others but in terms of skillset there really isn't anything it can't do. Set it free, and let it grow!
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
- Cruel_Ruin
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,091
- And1: 767
- Joined: Nov 05, 2006
- Location: The intersection of intellect, imagination and insanity
-
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
KF10 wrote:I was digging the Evans/Cisco/Casspi/Cousins/Dalembert lineup last night.
Come on PW!
I <3 that lineup
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
- longfellow44
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,031
- And1: 241
- Joined: May 04, 2007
- Location: Washinton DC
Re: Anyone else think that Cisco should start at SF
My favorite lineup is.
Beno
Evans
Casspi
Cousins
Dalembert
That luneup has very solid chemistry. I just wish we had a decent pg otherthan beno si that evans and udrih could be on the floot together more iften.
Beno
Evans
Casspi
Cousins
Dalembert
That luneup has very solid chemistry. I just wish we had a decent pg otherthan beno si that evans and udrih could be on the floot together more iften.