next2spike wrote:This is why I'm starting to ignore reading this board anymore.
Yep
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

next2spike wrote:This is why I'm starting to ignore reading this board anymore.
WesJ4 wrote:He didn't get to the line alot because his shots were falling. It's not like he can't go to the hole. He shot 55%.


St Knick wrote:beasley being melo caliber? thats a stretch
however, i do agree with the overall sentiment that he can be a good player in this league. he didn't seem to fit in with what the heat were doing. he strikes me as a guy that need to have offense run through him. might be destined to be one of those guys who puts up great stats for bad teams... wait, is that a good thing?!?!

nyknicks2k2 wrote:Can't believe people are trying to downplay this to such a major extent. I'm not a Beas fan and his hair looks (Please Use More Appropriate Word) (I know, random) but it was a very very good game for him. Back to back games actually. I would agree that comparing to Melo may be a bit to much (at least for now) but it's obvious that he has some potential there. Moving to a team that would give him freedom is huge for him. Not just because he gets to shoot more often but because it allows him to see what works for him as a top option and gives him a huge confidence boost when games like this happens. It was a needed move.


magnumt wrote:He actually reminded me of Al Harrington last night. Especially when he was launching 3's as soon as they made their way down.
If Love didn't go off like he did, they would've lost that Game and Beasley would've "got his" but be frowned upon as a chucker.
--Mags




Flaming Mo wrote:Melo level?! Come on guys, does it take 2 games these days to be on superstar level?!
Credit to Beasley for shredding the Knicks and Gallinari and Sacramento the game before but hey, he is the only real option on a horrible team and of course he will score. We all knew he is a talented scorer but this game is no indication of how good or bad he is as we have seen players shred the Knicks for years now. Please put things in perspective.


magnumt wrote:Flaming Mo wrote:Melo level?! Come on guys, does it take 2 games these days to be on superstar level?!
Credit to Beasley for shredding the Knicks and Gallinari and Sacramento the game before but hey, he is the only real option on a horrible team and of course he will score. We all knew he is a talented scorer but this game is no indication of how good or bad he is as we have seen players shred the Knicks for years now. Please put things in perspective.
Up until the 4th when Love went off, I don't think Beasley shredded Gallo at all.
Infact, if you go back and look a the 1st 3 Quarters, Gallo got Beasley into foul trouble twice! Gallo also was leading the Game in scoring too until the 3rd.
Why D'Antoni took Gallo out for so long is dumb IMO.
--Mags

TrueWarrior wrote:TKF wrote:
Beasleyis a dope.. hehad a 42 pt game the other night as well.. the guy likes to shoot and he can score.. but 35 points on 29 shots is not good... He is really not a good defender and doesn't play with great court awareness.. check back 15 games from now when beasley is chucking shots and missing and losing games for the wolves..
chandler is a different player.. in that chandler doesn't have beasley's offensive talent, but chandler is more of a two way player, he will impact the game in different ways..
beasley is not in melo's universe... if it was too early to say chandler's game has evloved, well certainly we can say the same thing about beasley after a couple of good games.. especially comparing him to melo..
Oh I know Chandler is the better two way player. Hes the better defender and shot blocker. But Beasley was making moves Chandler couldnt dream of. All Im saying is he looked like Melo last night. Whether he keep it up remains to be seen, but IDK why some of you guys are getting so defensive. Had Gallo or Chandler scored like him we would be jumping for joy. Again it was how he was scoring that was special to me. Now we're using the PPS against him? Justdatdude explains it pretty well.Justdatdude wrote:
I remember that discussion and it was during the playoffs. Everyone blamed Beasley for Miami failing, but me and you kept saying how he's not a #2 player, and how Wade lesser the impact of the other options around him. No one was buying that at that time. The main story was Beasley sucks, Gallinari is better, and Beasley is better.
I also been made the Beasley to Melo comparison. Forget about who is better, the way they play basketball on the offensive end is similar. They both have the tools to score from anywhere on the court, the quickness to get by many wing players, and the strength to score on the smaller players. On offense, there is no move they don't have. He dominated college and was the 2nd pick. Don't let his play next to Dwade fool you. He didn't get a real opportunity in Miami. He's just now getting his chance to show what he can do as the #1 option.
Last, but not least, how is Beasley 35 points on 29 shots not good? Is it because he didn't get to the freethrow line? Everyone who watched the game seen he attacked the basket and the refs were stingy all night, as Clyde constantly pointed out. He still shot over 50% from the field. Can someone explain this to me?
Thank you. Its funny how some of these cats think I just pulled the comparison out of my ass. Hes been compared to him numerous times. Melo scored 32 on 14-25 shots against the Lakers. He looked great and they beat the best team in the NBA. Are we going to nitpick about his performance? If you dont make alot of threes or get to the line in a particular game then your PPS isnt going to be that good, but how can anyone be saying 50%+ from the field is bad? It was the WAY Beasley scored that prompted me to make the comparison again. He had a great arsenal of moves and no matter who we put on him he scored one on one. His mid range game was wet and was exactly what we needed down the stretch. He just looked like Melo on offense.
The reason I got on Chandler for his PPS was because I thought he was scoring in the same ways as last season. No real skill moves and some of his shots were bad shots that luckily went in. Chandler was only shooting 45% too the first 3 games (42% now) and he faded in every game in crunch time, unlike Beasley did last night. Thats the biggest difference. Beasley played like an offensive go to guy when they needed it the most.
Again people take a chill will pill. Im not saying Beasley is Melo, but if you didnt think he looked like Melo last night then you must be blind because that was a mirror image. Lets see if he keeps it up because he is the number one option now.
magnumt wrote:Flaming Mo wrote:Melo level?! Come on guys, does it take 2 games these days to be on superstar level?!
Credit to Beasley for shredding the Knicks and Gallinari and Sacramento the game before but hey, he is the only real option on a horrible team and of course he will score. We all knew he is a talented scorer but this game is no indication of how good or bad he is as we have seen players shred the Knicks for years now. Please put things in perspective.
Up until the 4th when Love went off, I don't think Beasley shredded Gallo at all.
Infact, if you go back and look a the 1st 3 Quarters, Gallo got Beasley into foul trouble twice! Gallo also was leading the Game in scoring too until the 3rd.
Why D'Antoni took Gallo out for so long is dumb IMO.
--Mags

TheBluest wrote:TrueWarrior wrote:TKF wrote:
Beasleyis a dope.. hehad a 42 pt game the other night as well.. the guy likes to shoot and he can score.. but 35 points on 29 shots is not good... He is really not a good defender and doesn't play with great court awareness.. check back 15 games from now when beasley is chucking shots and missing and losing games for the wolves..
chandler is a different player.. in that chandler doesn't have beasley's offensive talent, but chandler is more of a two way player, he will impact the game in different ways..
beasley is not in melo's universe... if it was too early to say chandler's game has evloved, well certainly we can say the same thing about beasley after a couple of good games.. especially comparing him to melo..
Oh I know Chandler is the better two way player. Hes the better defender and shot blocker. But Beasley was making moves Chandler couldnt dream of. All Im saying is he looked like Melo last night. Whether he keep it up remains to be seen, but IDK why some of you guys are getting so defensive. Had Gallo or Chandler scored like him we would be jumping for joy. Again it was how he was scoring that was special to me. Now we're using the PPS against him? Justdatdude explains it pretty well.Justdatdude wrote:
I remember that discussion and it was during the playoffs. Everyone blamed Beasley for Miami failing, but me and you kept saying how he's not a #2 player, and how Wade lesser the impact of the other options around him. No one was buying that at that time. The main story was Beasley sucks, Gallinari is better, and Beasley is better.
I also been made the Beasley to Melo comparison. Forget about who is better, the way they play basketball on the offensive end is similar. They both have the tools to score from anywhere on the court, the quickness to get by many wing players, and the strength to score on the smaller players. On offense, there is no move they don't have. He dominated college and was the 2nd pick. Don't let his play next to Dwade fool you. He didn't get a real opportunity in Miami. He's just now getting his chance to show what he can do as the #1 option.
Last, but not least, how is Beasley 35 points on 29 shots not good? Is it because he didn't get to the freethrow line? Everyone who watched the game seen he attacked the basket and the refs were stingy all night, as Clyde constantly pointed out. He still shot over 50% from the field. Can someone explain this to me?
Thank you. Its funny how some of these cats think I just pulled the comparison out of my ass. Hes been compared to him numerous times. Melo scored 32 on 14-25 shots against the Lakers. He looked great and they beat the best team in the NBA. Are we going to nitpick about his performance? If you dont make alot of threes or get to the line in a particular game then your PPS isnt going to be that good, but how can anyone be saying 50%+ from the field is bad? It was the WAY Beasley scored that prompted me to make the comparison again. He had a great arsenal of moves and no matter who we put on him he scored one on one. His mid range game was wet and was exactly what we needed down the stretch. He just looked like Melo on offense.
The reason I got on Chandler for his PPS was because I thought he was scoring in the same ways as last season. No real skill moves and some of his shots were bad shots that luckily went in. Chandler was only shooting 45% too the first 3 games (42% now) and he faded in every game in crunch time, unlike Beasley did last night. Thats the biggest difference. Beasley played like an offensive go to guy when they needed it the most.
Again people take a chill will pill. Im not saying Beasley is Melo, but if you didnt think he looked like Melo last night then you must be blind because that was a mirror image. Lets see if he keeps it up because he is the number one option now.
TW you should know the rules by now
Gallo can be compared to Dirk
Beasley can't be compared to Melo
BTW as I stated in my first post they aren't quite the same, Beas has a ways to go. Beasley is a different player than I anticipated he would be... probably because playing against College players and their size is totally different once you hit the NBA. He had more of a power game in College like a mix of Blake Griffin meets Kevin Durant.....I'm talking college game. I thought he would transition into a 4 but looks as if he's a 3. Melo plays much more aggressive....Beasley is finesse but they do have similarities in some areas of their games in particular the face up 17ft jumper. I believe some fans were comparing Beasley to Antawn Jamison which I disagree with but he most certainly almost shoots 3s like him but not in any way, shape, or form as crafty as AJ and has better handles overall like a guard. He has a little Wilson Chandler in his game too, but offensively more tuned.
Funny thing is fans were going skies the limit with Gallo on 15ppg/5reb on 11.4FGA/gm 42%fg 38%fg but Beasley as someone who wasn't going to amount to much when they had comparable stats before last season came to conclusion. Beasley is shooting 47% and 40%fg(3pt) on 16.6FGA averaging 20ppp/5reb 5FTA/gm....sorry folks this is pretty good production. There were very few who thought he would show his value and it appears like they could be right.

TKF wrote:I figured you would pop up with this type of post.. but honestly, when you compare players, you take more than skill into thought.. it is mental make up as well... gallo is a seemingly stable and smart kid on the court.... beasley is a mental midget and a dope... ones mental make up has a lot to do with the kind of player he can become.. that is why it is laughable to think curry could become another shaq, although he had all the physical ability.. well most of us feel the same way.. Melo is a well grounded , smart basketball player... beasley is a dope, a bafoon, a guy who dyes his hair blond and grows dreads looking like a cross dressing las vegas drag queen.. he is the court jester... so that is why most of us don't feel he is in the same universe melo is in.. I suspect in 20 games or so, minny will be complaining about beasley... He just seems like that type of guy.. I can look in a persons eyes and tell a lot about them sometimes.. when I look at beasley, I see a guy who miami didn't just trade to make room for the big 3, but they had no more interest in that head case regardless...

TrueWarrior wrote:TKF wrote:I figured you would pop up with this type of post.. but honestly, when you compare players, you take more than skill into thought.. it is mental make up as well... gallo is a seemingly stable and smart kid on the court.... beasley is a mental midget and a dope... ones mental make up has a lot to do with the kind of player he can become.. that is why it is laughable to think curry could become another shaq, although he had all the physical ability.. well most of us feel the same way.. Melo is a well grounded , smart basketball player... beasley is a dope, a bafoon, a guy who dyes his hair blond and grows dreads looking like a cross dressing las vegas drag queen.. he is the court jester... so that is why most of us don't feel he is in the same universe melo is in.. I suspect in 20 games or so, minny will be complaining about beasley... He just seems like that type of guy.. I can look in a persons eyes and tell a lot about them sometimes.. when I look at beasley, I see a guy who miami didn't just trade to make room for the big 3, but they had no more interest in that head case regardless...
This whole post is immature and hate filled. I expect better TKF. Beasley is only 21 years old. Melo was no saint at 21 either. I mean do you remember the brawl for christ sake? Just because Beasley smoked some weed and isnt clean cut doesnt mean hes a bad guy. In fact his teammates supposedly love him. Clyde was saying Kevin Love mentioned Beasley was one of the best locker room guys he played with so far.
Like Hawthorne said, everyone deserves a 2nd chance. You just sound bitter and pissed that he went off on us. Beasley isnt some scrub here. He went to school on us and made All Star shots. He has that ability. Just like Gallo has Dirk/Peja ability. Its all about being consistent. You cant sneeze at back to back 42 and 34 point games in WINS though, no matter who he played. Beasley is going to be very good.
You just sound bitter and pissed that he went off on us. Beasley isnt some scrub here.

TrueWarrior wrote:TKF wrote:I figured you would pop up with this type of post.. but honestly, when you compare players, you take more than skill into thought.. it is mental make up as well... gallo is a seemingly stable and smart kid on the court.... beasley is a mental midget and a dope... ones mental make up has a lot to do with the kind of player he can become.. that is why it is laughable to think curry could become another shaq, although he had all the physical ability.. well most of us feel the same way.. Melo is a well grounded , smart basketball player... beasley is a dope, a bafoon, a guy who dyes his hair blond and grows dreads looking like a cross dressing las vegas drag queen.. he is the court jester... so that is why most of us don't feel he is in the same universe melo is in.. I suspect in 20 games or so, minny will be complaining about beasley... He just seems like that type of guy.. I can look in a persons eyes and tell a lot about them sometimes.. when I look at beasley, I see a guy who miami didn't just trade to make room for the big 3, but they had no more interest in that head case regardless...
This whole post is immature and hate filled. I expect better TKF. Beasley is only 21 years old. Melo was no saint at 21 either. I mean do you remember the brawl for christ sake? Just because Beasley smoked some weed and isnt clean cut doesnt mean hes a bad guy. In fact his teammates supposedly love him. Clyde was saying Kevin Love mentioned Beasley was one of the best locker room guys he played with so far.
Like Hawthorne said, everyone deserves a 2nd chance. You just sound bitter and pissed that he went off on us. Beasley isnt some scrub here. He went to school on us and made All Star shots. He has that ability. Just like Gallo has Dirk/Peja ability. Its all about being consistent. You cant sneeze at back to back 42 and 34 point games in WINS though, no matter who he played. Beasley is going to be very good.