Joe Alexander
Joe Alexander
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 1
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 28, 2010
Joe Alexander
Joe Alexander just got waived and I really think the Kings need to be thinking about getting him. The have 14 players on their roster and he would not be a bad choice. He's a 6 foot 8 Power Forward that can shoot 3's and he was on the milwaukee bucks. I think he would be a good addition to this young squad!!
Re: Joe Alexander
- Nicky Nix Nook
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 8,672
- And1: 153
- Joined: Nov 13, 2008
- Contact:
-
Re: Joe Alexander
Huh?
He's a natural 3 and he isn't that good. Just ask the Bucks. He was overrated coming out of college and he does not improve this team whatsoever. Moreover, even if you considered him a PF, how in the hell is he going to get minutes?
SF's: Casspi, Greene, Garcia, Wright
PF's: Landry, Thompson, Jackson, Whiteside
There's literally not a single reason why the Kings should remotely consider signing him.
He's a natural 3 and he isn't that good. Just ask the Bucks. He was overrated coming out of college and he does not improve this team whatsoever. Moreover, even if you considered him a PF, how in the hell is he going to get minutes?
SF's: Casspi, Greene, Garcia, Wright
PF's: Landry, Thompson, Jackson, Whiteside
There's literally not a single reason why the Kings should remotely consider signing him.
Re: Joe Alexander
- twoolfork1
- Junior
- Posts: 463
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 19, 2010
- Location: Sacramento, CA
Re: Joe Alexander
Nicky Nix Nook wrote:Huh?
He's a natural 3 and he isn't that good. Just ask the Bucks. He was overrated coming out of college and he does not improve this team whatsoever. Moreover, even if you considered him a PF, how in the hell is he going to get minutes?
SF's: Casspi, Greene, Garcia, Wright
PF's: Landry, Thompson, Jackson, Whiteside
There's literally not a single reason why the Kings should remotely consider signing him.
The way PW has been distributing playing time so far its more like:
SF: Casspi, Garacia, Wright .. .. .. .. ... .. . .. .. Greene
White Mamba

Re: Joe Alexander
- pillwenney
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 48,887
- And1: 2,603
- Joined: Sep 19, 2004
- Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
- Contact:
-
Re: Joe Alexander
He got waived for a reason. He's a bad basketball player.
Re: Joe Alexander
- RIPskaterdude
- RealGM
- Posts: 92,817
- And1: 37,039
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
-
Re: Joe Alexander
mitchweber wrote:He got waived for a reason. He's a bad basketball player.
So you're saying that he's perfect for the Kings, then?


Re: Joe Alexander
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,129
- And1: 644
- Joined: Jun 03, 2007
-
Re: Joe Alexander
Nicky Nix Nook wrote:Huh?
He's a natural 3 and he isn't that good. Just ask the Bucks. He was overrated coming out of college and he does not improve this team whatsoever. Moreover, even if you considered him a PF, how in the hell is he going to get minutes?
SF's: Casspi, Greene, Garcia, Wright
PF's: Landry, Thompson, Jackson, Whiteside
There's literally not a single reason why the Kings should remotely consider signing him.
He would play way before Greene plays. Whatever makes it so Wright doesn't play I'll be fine.
Re: Joe Alexander
-
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 25,434
- And1: 5,537
- Joined: Jul 28, 2006
-
Re: Joe Alexander
JA sucks as a basketball player. He had a good tournament and all of the sudden he is considered a lotto-talent. He was never that good in the first place.