ImageImageImageImageImage

Joe Alexander

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

kingsgeeksports
Ballboy
Posts: 1
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 28, 2010

Joe Alexander 

Post#1 » by kingsgeeksports » Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:54 pm

Joe Alexander just got waived and I really think the Kings need to be thinking about getting him. The have 14 players on their roster and he would not be a bad choice. He's a 6 foot 8 Power Forward that can shoot 3's and he was on the milwaukee bucks. I think he would be a good addition to this young squad!!
User avatar
Nicky Nix Nook
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,672
And1: 153
Joined: Nov 13, 2008
Contact:
       

Re: Joe Alexander 

Post#2 » by Nicky Nix Nook » Sun Nov 14, 2010 8:00 pm

Huh?

He's a natural 3 and he isn't that good. Just ask the Bucks. He was overrated coming out of college and he does not improve this team whatsoever. Moreover, even if you considered him a PF, how in the hell is he going to get minutes?

SF's: Casspi, Greene, Garcia, Wright
PF's: Landry, Thompson, Jackson, Whiteside

There's literally not a single reason why the Kings should remotely consider signing him.
User avatar
twoolfork1
Junior
Posts: 463
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 19, 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Joe Alexander 

Post#3 » by twoolfork1 » Mon Nov 15, 2010 1:04 am

Nicky Nix Nook wrote:Huh?

He's a natural 3 and he isn't that good. Just ask the Bucks. He was overrated coming out of college and he does not improve this team whatsoever. Moreover, even if you considered him a PF, how in the hell is he going to get minutes?

SF's: Casspi, Greene, Garcia, Wright
PF's: Landry, Thompson, Jackson, Whiteside

There's literally not a single reason why the Kings should remotely consider signing him.


The way PW has been distributing playing time so far its more like:

SF: Casspi, Garacia, Wright .. .. .. .. ... .. . .. .. Greene
White Mamba
Image
User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,887
And1: 2,603
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

Re: Joe Alexander 

Post#4 » by pillwenney » Mon Nov 15, 2010 1:37 am

He got waived for a reason. He's a bad basketball player.
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 92,817
And1: 37,039
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

Re: Joe Alexander 

Post#5 » by RIPskaterdude » Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:52 am

mitchweber wrote:He got waived for a reason. He's a bad basketball player.


So you're saying that he's perfect for the Kings, then? 8-)
Image
Silver Man
Starter
Posts: 2,129
And1: 644
Joined: Jun 03, 2007
 

Re: Joe Alexander 

Post#6 » by Silver Man » Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:58 am

Nicky Nix Nook wrote:Huh?

He's a natural 3 and he isn't that good. Just ask the Bucks. He was overrated coming out of college and he does not improve this team whatsoever. Moreover, even if you considered him a PF, how in the hell is he going to get minutes?

SF's: Casspi, Greene, Garcia, Wright
PF's: Landry, Thompson, Jackson, Whiteside

There's literally not a single reason why the Kings should remotely consider signing him.


He would play way before Greene plays. Whatever makes it so Wright doesn't play I'll be fine.
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Joe Alexander 

Post#7 » by KF10 » Mon Nov 15, 2010 5:10 am

JA sucks as a basketball player. He had a good tournament and all of the sudden he is considered a lotto-talent. He was never that good in the first place.

Return to Sacramento Kings