Ime Udoka

Moderator: G R E Y

SApuro_
Rookie
Posts: 1,147
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Ime Udoka 

Post#1 » by SApuro_ » Thu Nov 25, 2010 4:16 am

Ime is the newest Spur once again. What do you guys think about the pick up?
User avatar
Donald Kaufman
General Manager
Posts: 8,409
And1: 602
Joined: Aug 10, 2004
 

Re: Ime Udoka 

Post#2 » by Donald Kaufman » Thu Nov 25, 2010 4:51 am

When we got him the first time around the thinking was he was going to be groomed as a Bowen replacement. That never quite panned out obviously. But he was a serviceable player, decent from long range and a competent defensive player.

I think he's a good short term option for the team. What are the terms? 10 day contracts etc. ?
co_laper
General Manager
Posts: 8,531
And1: 331
Joined: Jun 06, 2002
 

Re: Ime Udoka 

Post#3 » by co_laper » Thu Nov 25, 2010 5:24 am

I don't think Udoka is the short term guy here. I'm thinking if the Spurs are going to continue tinkering with that 13th spot, the next guy they cut is Chris Quinn. Not Udoka.
Frankie23
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,534
And1: 312
Joined: Apr 27, 2010
   

Re: Ime Udoka 

Post#4 » by Frankie23 » Thu Nov 25, 2010 1:27 pm

3 minutes yesturday. He is not a shooter, nor top defender.

Waive hiiiim!!
User avatar
Nolan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,911
And1: 6,612
Joined: Aug 26, 2007
Location: Edmonton AB
   

Re: Ime Udoka 

Post#5 » by Nolan » Thu Nov 25, 2010 3:33 pm

He's a decent pickup. He knows the system, knows the players, he's a decent defender and an alright shooter.
@bruce_arthur "And finally, as a whore." RT @docfunk "Here is what LeBron looks like as a Knick, a Fireman, an Astronaut..."
Frankie23
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,534
And1: 312
Joined: Apr 27, 2010
   

Re: Ime Udoka 

Post#6 » by Frankie23 » Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:37 pm

Nolan wrote:He's a decent pickup. He knows the system, knows the players, he's a decent defender and an alright shooter.

Of course it's for the 12-13th spot, but the only good thing about Udoka is that the "knows" the system, but how worthy is that if you are not good at anything (just decent) and you are going to play 5 minutes per game with good luck?

i'd rather have a good shooter or a good defender..I don't know very much of Danny Green, but at least he was young..
jman3134
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 19,490
And1: 1,337
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Follow me on Twitter: JTMBasketball
Contact:
 

Re: Ime Udoka 

Post#7 » by jman3134 » Sat Nov 27, 2010 4:30 am

I would rather have Udoka in case someone gets injured. Danny Green was in a slump from summer league. At least Udoka would fill in as a serviceable system player with solid defense. Green, while long and athletic, would not often play within himself. He may be the better player at this stage, but he was not the right fit for the Spurs.
SApuro_
Rookie
Posts: 1,147
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Ime Udoka 

Post#8 » by SApuro_ » Sun Nov 28, 2010 12:12 am

I like our pick up of Ime Udodo. He gives us some depth at the position. He knows what Pop wants and can provide 10-12 decents mins in a pinch.
User avatar
tugs
RealGM
Posts: 16,878
And1: 2,994
Joined: Jul 22, 2010

Re: Ime Udoka 

Post#9 » by tugs » Tue Nov 30, 2010 1:42 am

i still would have wanted Hughes over Udoka.

i know stats doesn't reflect ALL there is to know about a player but MOSTLY it does. i'm not an expert with the PERs but so i'll just use this:

Udoka 08-09 (SAS) stats:

FG- 38.3%
3pt FG- 32.8%
FT- 60.9%
2.8 RPG
0.8 APG
0.5 SPG
0.2 BPG
4.3 PPG

Hughes 09-10 (CHA) stats:

FG- 32.7%
3pt FG- 35.7%
FT- 85.3%
2.3 RPG
2.0 APG
0.9 SPG
0.3 BPG
8.1 PPG

i used 08-09 for Udoka- closer to his possible production now because he was playing for Pops and 09-10 for Hughes- his role in CHA will probably be the same in SA, off the bench. he was one of the main guys in NY (where he had decent stats) so i didn't use that.

the team could've gotten more if they signed Hughes. he could've played a Finley role but with the Bowen D.
User avatar
Donald Kaufman
General Manager
Posts: 8,409
And1: 602
Joined: Aug 10, 2004
 

Re: Ime Udoka 

Post#10 » by Donald Kaufman » Tue Nov 30, 2010 2:02 am

Hughes, as in Larry Hughes? No thanks. LH has never come close to being as good a defender as Bowen.

Udoka's been here before, that's why Pops went with him. He knows the system. LH has a bit of that "me first" gene, and wouldn't make it here.
co_laper
General Manager
Posts: 8,531
And1: 331
Joined: Jun 06, 2002
 

Re: Ime Udoka 

Post#11 » by co_laper » Tue Nov 30, 2010 6:10 am

Yeah, I don't think Hughes is a good fit either.

Hughes is a SG (even thou he's the same height as Udoka) and his defensive game is his ability to steal the ball. Something the Spurs don't really like because it's a gamble and compromise the whole defense. I don't recall Hughes as a shooter either and is someone who needs the ball in the offense to contribute.
User avatar
Nolan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,911
And1: 6,612
Joined: Aug 26, 2007
Location: Edmonton AB
   

Re: Ime Udoka 

Post#12 » by Nolan » Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:26 pm

co_laper wrote:Yeah, I don't think Hughes is a good fit either.

Hughes is a SG (even thou he's the same height as Udoka) and his defensive game is his ability to steal the ball. Something the Spurs don't really like because it's a gamble and compromise the whole defense. I don't recall Hughes as a shooter either and is someone who needs the ball in the offense to contribute.


Yup, if he doesn't have the ball in his hands he's useless. I have zero interest in Hughes.

Antoine Wright on the other hand just got released by the Kings and I really think he'd be a good fit. He's a big strong wing that plays good defense and can knock down the odd jumper.
@bruce_arthur "And finally, as a whore." RT @docfunk "Here is what LeBron looks like as a Knick, a Fireman, an Astronaut..."
User avatar
Viper1500
Head Coach
Posts: 6,923
And1: 2,801
Joined: Apr 15, 2009
Location: Orlando, FL
   

Re: Ime Udoka 

Post#13 » by Viper1500 » Tue Nov 30, 2010 11:07 pm

oops
TAI8
Banned User
Posts: 7,205
And1: 5
Joined: May 14, 2005

Re: Ime Udoka 

Post#14 » by TAI8 » Tue Nov 30, 2010 11:30 pm

Viper1500 wrote:http://www.exploringnature.org/db/detail.php?dbID=7&detID=78


Ok... ? lol
User avatar
tugs
RealGM
Posts: 16,878
And1: 2,994
Joined: Jul 22, 2010

Re: Ime Udoka 

Post#15 » by tugs » Wed Dec 1, 2010 1:18 am

i've been watching Hughes since his DC days and yes, his jumper and his volume shooting of his mother effen bricks has been the Achilles heel of his game. due to injuries, he lost his explosiveness and hence developed a "decent" midrange pull up (mostly evident in NY with D Lee pick and roll sets) and 3 pt game (in CHA).he is also a great facilitator. he could've been the solution to NY's PG problem last year if not for D'Antoni's fascination with Duhon.

there are a lot of PROs to Hughes' game that could complement Duncan's, Manu's, and Tony's game. but you got me on the gambling part. :P

and yeah,if the Spurs want the typical 3, they should get Wright.
jman3134
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 19,490
And1: 1,337
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Follow me on Twitter: JTMBasketball
Contact:
 

Re: Ime Udoka 

Post#16 » by jman3134 » Wed Dec 1, 2010 7:15 am

That is true. Adding Wright would really give them another weapon off the bench. Udoka's defense/lockerroom leadership could warrant a roster spot as well.

Return to San Antonio Spurs