Justdatdude wrote:Your whole argument on why King was/is better than Carmelo is that he had a better shot selection. That's all your argument is based on. The fact that King wasn't winning ballgames and only made the playoffs 4 times in his whole career doesn't matter to you. I like Bernard King, loved him as a player, and I won't go to much into this simply because I like the guy and don't want to put him down or make it seem like I'm underrating how good he is. But he wasn't better than Carmelo. If shot selection was the prime factor on who the better player is than what is the argument for Kobe being ahead of Wade? Don't tell me its winning games or is it? You tell me. King at his peak, meaning his very very best, was better than Carmelo is now. Compare King's career to what Carmelo has done now and King isn't better. So if you want to take that season in which he played 55 games and averaged close to 33 points per game to make a point, then go ahead.
Bernard carried the Knicks on his back during his healthy years in New York - despite having forgettable supporting casts and playing in an era when men were still allowed to be men, and hard fouls were the rule rather than the exception. I'd like to see Melo play in an era when what Mardy Collins gave him was considered child's play - as opposed an opportunity to sucker punch an opponent.
And, yes, for scorers, shot selection is everything. A man's gotta know his limitations.
























