Turk Nowitzki wrote:LOL at the Cubs fan trying to rain on our parade.
Nope, just asking questions that popped up after the trade. LOL at you immediately getting defensive over a few simple questions! I'm kidding.
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation
Turk Nowitzki wrote:LOL at the Cubs fan trying to rain on our parade.
Maybe that was poor wording on my part...all I'm saying is that things may not go according to plan and the entire franchise may suffer...

Ruben Douglas wrote:I disagree. I have never seen a professional team promote making the playoffs as such a success as the Brewers have. Didn't they have a Sabathia bobble head day just last year? The playoff rally for the Brewers was almost comical. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying this is a bad thing. But the expectations for the Brewers for such a long time was to just get to .500, then it was the playoffs...so the next logical step would be to advance in the playoffs...but let's be realistic here, if the Brewers just make the playoffs it will be considered a success...as it should be.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Ruben Douglas wrote:Turk Nowitzki wrote:LOL at the Cubs fan trying to rain on our parade.
Nope, just asking questions that popped up after the trade. LOL at you immediately getting defensive over a few simple questions! I'm kidding.
[/quote]I actually agree here. Making the playoffs would be considered a success in the eyes of the organization and in the eyes of many Brewers fans. But, I think many of us would like to see us advance to the NLCS or further before they label this move a success, and I can't argue with that, either. Success means different things to different people.
I guess the questions are as follows:
1. If we make the playoffs this season, will this move be a success in your eyes? The NLCS? The WS?
2. If we miss the playoffs this season due to major injuries, will you give Melvin the benefit of the doubt on this move?
3. If we miss the playoffs this season but lock up Greinke and Marcum long term, are you okay with these moves? What about just Greinke or Marcum?
I could see varying answers to each of these questions. Hindsight is always 20/20, so there will be a lot of heat on DM and MA if we aren't successful. Ignoring that reality, I'm fine with Melvin making this move now. We can't predict how the season will play out, but we've set up our roster to be competitive in the short term, and if we're okay with a win-now move, then I don't see how you can oppose this move.
clownparade wrote:fans of teams like the yankees/redsox or cubs ect wont understand trades like this because they just buy players and can have a payroll 200 million. trades like this have to be made for teams like the brewers. and imo making playoffs is a success, this isnt the nba where half the league makes the playoffs, it does matter in baseball.
Turk Nowitzki wrote:clownparade wrote:fans of teams like the yankees/redsox or cubs ect wont understand trades like this because they just buy players and can have a payroll 200 million. trades like this have to be made for teams like the brewers. and imo making playoffs is a success, this isnt the nba where half the league makes the playoffs, it does matter in baseball.
This.

clownparade wrote:fans of teams like the yankees/redsox or cubs ect wont understand trades like this because they just buy players and can have a payroll 200 million.

MajorDad wrote:I keep reading Cronus saying how bad Betencourt is. but he uses no stats to back up his words. All he ever says is he's terrible and a piece of crap. At least he can hit.
MajorDad wrote:on the downside, melvin saved his job and will probably be given a 3 year extension. I've said all along, melvin has an eye for pitching, he just doesn't value it very highly. In the past 5 years , Melvin traded for CC Sabathia. he also had deals agreed upon for Halladay, Peavy and Bedard. The hallada y dea l was canceled by hallady invoking his no trade claus. the Peavey and Bedard deals were caneled because of their injuries. Wolf was supposedly the second best FA pitcher last year, and melvin also went after pavano who was supposedly the second best FA pitcher this year.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
MikeIsGood wrote:trwi7 wrote:Soca wrote:lol at the people that want renteria. Don't let one hr he hit off cliff lee fool you, he's terrible defensively and always injured.
If Betancourt is our starting SS, I will be furious. I would take anybody over him.
This. Really has nothing to do with what happened in the WS. I do not want to watch Betancourt. Renteria is available.
Scutaro, sure, if we can pull it off.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
DrugBust wrote:Keith Law came out with his reaction to the deal. Loves it for Milwaukee, hates it for KC. Said they got low upside players and they opted for fit instead of impact.
Cain and Escobar are not top of the line impact players. Neither is special at the plate. I don't like giving up Odorizzi, but he was years away from contributing and a lot can happen in that amount of time. Losing Jeffress, if it is him, would hurt. I think he could have been our 8th inning guy for the next six years.
But again, we got ace, someone with the best raw stuff west of the Potomac. We needed a team like KC to reach on fit, because no way does our package net a legit Cy Young candidate most years.