ImageImageImage

Andre Miller

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

NewWolvesOrder
Head Coach
Posts: 6,943
And1: 1,262
Joined: Dec 20, 2008

Andre Miller 

Post#1 » by NewWolvesOrder » Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:35 pm

As we already know our PG play is really holding us back. Rubio maybe here next year or maybe not if lockout possibilty is high, in his recent interview he said he needs to tell Barca before season's end wether he staying or going. If I were to bet money I would put them on Rubio staying one more year. Ridnour is pure garbage except his shooting, Flynn is very unstable and is not in Rubio's league as a playmaker. I think a good vet pg that still can play will help our other guys develop their game and help us grow as a team and pass the torch to Rubio when he's here.

I think Andre Miller could be a good candiadate for this role, the guy makes his teammates better and can be the real stabilizing force on this team. B. Roy doesn't like to play him cause it forces him off the ball( What a whiny b*tch!). Ridnour would be ideal pg for Roy as he's really similar to Roy's BFF Steve Blake. I'd give them Flynn or Mem pick to make up the value.

Anybody else agrees with this?
Piecake
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,885
And1: 264
Joined: Nov 13, 2010

Re: Andre Miller 

Post#2 » by Piecake » Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:39 pm

I'm not including Flynn or a mid first on a 34 year-old pg.
NewWolvesOrder
Head Coach
Posts: 6,943
And1: 1,262
Joined: Dec 20, 2008

Re: Andre Miller 

Post#3 » by NewWolvesOrder » Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:42 pm

Piecake wrote:I'm not including Flynn or a mid first on a 34 year-old pg.


then you have Ridnour driving you crazy for the next 2 years and Jonny Flynn not gonna ease out your pain. you must like to watch all these competetive losses.
Piecake
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,885
And1: 264
Joined: Nov 13, 2010

Re: Andre Miller 

Post#4 » by Piecake » Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:49 pm

I just think its silly to trade away assets for a 34 year-old pg so we can eek out a few more wins next season.

Either Rubio comes over and he is awesome or we draft Kyrie Irving and watch one of them develop next season and hopefully be a good team 2 years from now.
User avatar
The J Rocka
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,570
And1: 1,732
Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Location: Minneapolis
   

Re: Andre Miller 

Post#5 » by The J Rocka » Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:57 pm

Doesn't make sense to make a move for Miller, especially when you start to add assets. We aren't doing anything this year in terms of winning anyways. We can move Luke anytime whether it's tomorrow, in a few weeks, at the deadline, or next year. We all know he's a short term solution until next year when Rubio comes.
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: Andre Miller 

Post#6 » by Esohny » Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:59 pm

Piecake wrote:I just think its silly to trade away assets for a 34 year-old pg so we can eek out a few more wins next season.

Either Rubio comes over and he is awesome or we draft Kyrie Irving and watch one of them develop next season and hopefully be a good team 2 years from now.


You forget that if Irving is as good as you seem to think, the Wolves automatically have no chance at drafting him.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
NewWolvesOrder
Head Coach
Posts: 6,943
And1: 1,262
Joined: Dec 20, 2008

Re: Andre Miller 

Post#7 » by NewWolvesOrder » Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:59 pm

Piecake wrote:I just think its silly to trade away assets for a 34 year-old pg so we can eek out a few more wins next season.

Either Rubio comes over and he is awesome or we draft Kyrie Irving and watch one of them develop next season and hopefully be a good team 2 years from now.

Why are you even talking about a guy who hasn't even declared for the draft? do the wolves have exclusive rights to sign him?
It's not about a few wins next season, it's about guys like Love, Beasley, Wes, Martell developing, winning games, feeling good about themselves, developing that good chemistry that they have, more fans coming to TC to watch them win. This team has plenty of young talent, but they need a real good vet to show them the way, not some scrub named Luke Ridnour.
User avatar
The J Rocka
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,570
And1: 1,732
Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Location: Minneapolis
   

Re: Andre Miller 

Post#8 » by The J Rocka » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:03 am

Esohny wrote:
Piecake wrote:I just think its silly to trade away assets for a 34 year-old pg so we can eek out a few more wins next season.

Either Rubio comes over and he is awesome or we draft Kyrie Irving and watch one of them develop next season and hopefully be a good team 2 years from now.


You forget that if Irving is as good as you seem to think, the Wolves automatically have no chance at drafting him.

Ive heard if there's a lockout, the 2011 Draft could possibly be canceled and the prospects have to play another year of college ball, is there any truth to something like this happening? I know that wasn't the case for the 98-99 lockout, just curious if the problem isn't resolved in time, does it happen?
Piecake
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,885
And1: 264
Joined: Nov 13, 2010

Re: Andre Miller 

Post#9 » by Piecake » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:04 am

Turnover_21 wrote:
Piecake wrote:I just think its silly to trade away assets for a 34 year-old pg so we can eek out a few more wins next season.

Either Rubio comes over and he is awesome or we draft Kyrie Irving and watch one of them develop next season and hopefully be a good team 2 years from now.

Why are you even talking about a guy who hasn't even declared for the draft? do the wolves have exclusive rights to sign him?
It's not about a few wins next season, it's about guys like Love, Beasley, Wes, Martell developing, winning games, feeling good about themselves, developing that good chemistry that they have, more fans coming to TC to watch them win. This team has plenty of young talent, but they need a real good vet to show them the way, not some scrub named Luke Ridnour.


I have a time machine so I know he declares and that we have a chance to draft him :roll:

Andre Miller is not worth a mid first by himself

I'm all for getting him if we ship out Ridnour and some other piece if needed, but not at the price you gave
NewWolvesOrder
Head Coach
Posts: 6,943
And1: 1,262
Joined: Dec 20, 2008

Re: Andre Miller 

Post#10 » by NewWolvesOrder » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:11 am

Piecake wrote:
Turnover_21 wrote:
Piecake wrote:I just think its silly to trade away assets for a 34 year-old pg so we can eek out a few more wins next season.

Either Rubio comes over and he is awesome or we draft Kyrie Irving and watch one of them develop next season and hopefully be a good team 2 years from now.

Why are you even talking about a guy who hasn't even declared for the draft? do the wolves have exclusive rights to sign him?
It's not about a few wins next season, it's about guys like Love, Beasley, Wes, Martell developing, winning games, feeling good about themselves, developing that good chemistry that they have, more fans coming to TC to watch them win. This team has plenty of young talent, but they need a real good vet to show them the way, not some scrub named Luke Ridnour.


I have a time machine so I know he declares and that we have a chance to draft him :roll:

Andre Miller is not worth a mid first by himself

I'm all for getting him if we ship out Ridnour and some other piece if needed, but not at the price you gave


You can't get a good vet pg for a sack of R*dn@ur. Nothing good is free.
User avatar
UK-Wolf
Pro Prospect
Posts: 978
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 04, 2010
Location: Burnley, England.

Re: Andre Miller 

Post#11 » by UK-Wolf » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:43 am

Though I do agree that Miller's a good vet and would be handy helping out our younger guys I think we could get someone in who's got a few more years on the clock left than Miller. He's 34 and won't be too cheap. Ridnour's too inconsistent and hasn't been playing well so far, poor shot selection and just dumb play at times. He's shown that he has the ability but he just doesn't show it enough, the 20 pt 10 game assist game showed what he can do to some teams but I'm afraid that's been about it from him considering the large chunk of minutes he's had. Flynn's rusty but his D is appalling and it has been for a while, I like him, he's a good guy to have in the lockeroom and can get looks for his team-mates and can occasionally knock down a J or two. Then there's Telfair who's actually done a decent job for us, hasn't been consistent enough and can be stupid at times but in the time he's had big minutes he's done a decent job. Gaines needs cutting asap.

We do need to bring in someone but I wouldn't be throwing Flynn in a trade just yet. I'd rather trade Ridnour than Telfair, hopefully we can bring in someone from NYK for one of them two soon. Wouldn't mind Douglas from NYK but he's hardly a vet.
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Andre Miller 

Post#12 » by shangrila » Mon Dec 20, 2010 1:21 am

Can we just have a "I want this guy" thread? It seems every half decent scrubs gets their own topic these days.
User avatar
jade_hippo
Starter
Posts: 2,383
And1: 135
Joined: Jan 05, 2009
Location: Take off... eh!
 

Re: Andre Miller 

Post#13 » by jade_hippo » Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:54 am

Turnover_21 wrote:You can't get a good vet pg for a sack of R*dn@ur. Nothing good is free.


Well... you don't seem to like what our fans are willing to give up for him, so please tell us what we NEED to give up for this guy we aparently must have
NewWolvesOrder
Head Coach
Posts: 6,943
And1: 1,262
Joined: Dec 20, 2008

Re: Andre Miller 

Post#14 » by NewWolvesOrder » Mon Dec 20, 2010 3:05 am

jade_hippo wrote:
Turnover_21 wrote:You can't get a good vet pg for a sack of R*dn@ur. Nothing good is free.


Well... you don't seem to like what our fans are willing to give up for him, so please tell us what we NEED to give up for this guy we aparently must have


Try to reread my original post, try to read carefully and slowly and you may get your answer.
User avatar
jade_hippo
Starter
Posts: 2,383
And1: 135
Joined: Jan 05, 2009
Location: Take off... eh!
 

Re: Andre Miller 

Post#15 » by jade_hippo » Mon Dec 20, 2010 4:22 am

Turnover_21 wrote:
jade_hippo wrote:
Turnover_21 wrote:You can't get a good vet pg for a sack of R*dn@ur. Nothing good is free.


Well... you don't seem to like what our fans are willing to give up for him, so please tell us what we NEED to give up for this guy we aparently must have


Try to reread my original post, try to read carefully and slowly and you may get your answer.


Your snappy defensive responses to the offers seem to suggest you wish this to be something that should happen or are emotionally invested in Miller. So please, reread my post very slowly and very carefully and tell us all what you think the Wolves would give up to get Miller.
spolgar
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,333
And1: 104
Joined: Nov 08, 2005

Re: Andre Miller 

Post#16 » by spolgar » Mon Dec 20, 2010 4:42 am

Andre Miller is an excellent choice of a point guard for most theam if he were to beocme available. I'm sure he's smart enough to learn the triangle and that he can run half court sets really well.

Miller was never the fastest player on the court, nor has he acquired an outside shot. That's a knock against him on the triangle. I also think he's not a bad passing lane defender, but his on ball defense, IMHO, is mediocre at best according to 76ers personal from 2007/2008, albeit that Prichard said literally the opposite of that latter.

If you want a good on the ball defender, I think Aaron Brooks of Houston can be had pretty cheaply. He's not a pure point, but his outside shot is very clean and he can stay in front of his man. He also gives bigger, slower point guards (like Derek Fisher and Andre Miller), _fits_.

Right now Lowry is playing out of his mind, and Houston need a solid 2 string point instead of two 1st stringers. I think they have enough pieces to move around too. What do you guys have that they would want?
cpfsf
General Manager
Posts: 8,834
And1: 1,126
Joined: Apr 10, 2008
Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
 

Re: Andre Miller 

Post#17 » by cpfsf » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:31 am

Piecake wrote:I just think its silly to trade away assets for a 34 year-old pg so we can eek out a few more wins next season.

Either Rubio comes over and he is awesome or we draft Kyrie Irving and watch one of them develop next season and hopefully be a good team 2 years from now.


Yup, I'll listen if the name is Iguodala or Ellis, but I'm not in the mood to sacrifice our future.

shangrila wrote:Can we just have a "I want this guy" thread? It seems every half decent scrubs gets their own topic these days.


I recommend not visiting RC.
Image

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Andre Miller 

Post#18 » by shangrila » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:44 am

Even forgetting that he's 34, in what way does Miller fit this team? He's basically an older version of Sessions and everyone knows how well that turned out.
Peezo
Rookie
Posts: 1,051
And1: 79
Joined: Apr 06, 2010

Re: Andre Miller 

Post#19 » by Peezo » Mon Dec 20, 2010 6:45 am

I don't understand why we would add any piece we unless you think it will be on the team (or valuable to the team) 2 to 3 years from now.
Turnover_21 wrote:So who do we get? Capspace? Is Capspace white?
User avatar
Saltine
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,396
And1: 1,002
Joined: Jul 20, 2003
Location: Land o' Lakes
     

Re: Andre Miller 

Post#20 » by Saltine » Mon Dec 20, 2010 11:39 am

We shouldn't add anyone over the age of 27, there is no upside whatsoever...34? lol

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves