ImageImage

10 man rotation ain't gonna work

Moderators: ken6199, TMU

Guy986
RealGM
Posts: 17,759
And1: 647
Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Location: BBG Nation unite!

10 man rotation ain't gonna work 

Post#1 » by Guy986 » Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:19 am

Right now we're playing

Lowry
Martin
Battier
Scola
Hayes
Brooks
Hill
Miller
Lee
Budinger

Thats too many guys. When was the last time a successful team ran a 10 man rotation?
User avatar
Aaron Brooks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,148
And1: 629
Joined: Jan 14, 2008

Re: 10 man rotation ain't gonna work 

Post#2 » by Aaron Brooks » Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:29 am

Goodbye Miller and Bud
baki wrote:Harden is essentially a very good role player, he's not a franchise player.
User avatar
M4P
Analyst
Posts: 3,408
And1: 1,640
Joined: Aug 29, 2008
 

Re: 10 man rotation ain't gonna work 

Post#3 » by M4P » Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:48 am

uhh Celts and Magic. They can get away with it though because they're loaded with stars.
HoopsMalone wrote:Shaq would still have value... But to think he'd be anywhere near as dominant as he was in the post era is just ridiculous

jahlil okafor has some of the best post moves in the last 30 years and the dude can't even get on the floor
x-
Analyst
Posts: 3,511
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 06, 2005

Re: 10 man rotation ain't gonna work 

Post#4 » by x- » Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:55 am

I prefer a nine man roation myself, but at this point, with where this team is going and a roster three deep at every position, you might as well play ten guys.
User avatar
MaxRider
RealGM
Posts: 44,473
And1: 5,805
Joined: Jun 08, 2005
Location: Choke City
 

Re: 10 man rotation ain't gonna work 

Post#5 » by MaxRider » Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:55 am

it wont be 10 men rotation
we are playing matchup
if we need offense Miller and Bud will play
if we need defense Hill and Lee will play
User avatar
Teckon
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,206
And1: 30
Joined: Jan 09, 2006

Re: 10 man rotation ain't gonna work 

Post#6 » by Teckon » Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:56 am

The big man rotation of Scola/Hayes/Hill/Miller seem fine.
Scola is the guarantee starter. Hayes/Hill/Miller will play depending on match up.

The problem lies in the other 3 positions (PG, SG, & SF). We know the following will have priority:

Lowry, Martin, Battier, & Brooks (either Brooks or Lowry will come off the bench and expecting Brooks and Lowry to be on the court together in 4th if the match up allowed).

That's leave Lee, Budinger, T Will as the last rotation spot depending on match up.

See how Adelman manages these 3. not to mention about Patterson and Ish (these 2 should spend more time in D League this season)

By the way, JJ will be on spot duty if Scola/Battier in foul trouble and need his length for defense.
x-
Analyst
Posts: 3,511
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 06, 2005

Re: 10 man rotation ain't gonna work 

Post#7 » by x- » Mon Dec 20, 2010 3:03 am

Aaron Brooks wrote:Goodbye Miller and Bud


I don't see Morey trading them. Budinger trade value is low, so you might as well keep him. Miller probably has some value, but unless a team gets desperate and overpays/bids, they'll keep him around due to loyalty (RA) and to mentor Hill. At least for now.
User avatar
MaxRider
RealGM
Posts: 44,473
And1: 5,805
Joined: Jun 08, 2005
Location: Choke City
 

Re: 10 man rotation ain't gonna work 

Post#8 » by MaxRider » Mon Dec 20, 2010 3:06 am

x- wrote:
Aaron Brooks wrote:Goodbye Miller and Bud


I don't see Morey trading them. Budinger trade value is low, so you might as well keep him. Miller probably has some value, but unless a team gets desperate and overpays/bids, they'll keep him around due to loyalty (RA) and to mentor Hill. At least for now.

we finally have a 7 foot center (healthy to play)
i aint letting him go
rocketsballin
RealGM
Posts: 12,748
And1: 355
Joined: Mar 07, 2009

Re: 10 man rotation ain't gonna work 

Post#9 » by rocketsballin » Mon Dec 20, 2010 3:10 am

we cant trade miller, he's shown he's a perfect big for rick's system. other than scola, the other 3 bigs should be in depending on matchups. pg's are set. just sg/sf. i think it hsould depend on who's not in a slump. lee, bud, and twill's minutes are gonna be inconsistent.

or morey could get some trades going. you dont want abunch of role players and no superstars. that's what i would've thought he'd do if things didnt work out for this team.

last thing we could do is just go with the roster, we aint gonna do much, 8th seed at best. just build chemistry, develop players, etc. prolly wats gonna hapen
rocketsballin
RealGM
Posts: 12,748
And1: 355
Joined: Mar 07, 2009

Re: 10 man rotation ain't gonna work 

Post#10 » by rocketsballin » Mon Dec 20, 2010 3:13 am

MaxRider wrote:
x- wrote:
Aaron Brooks wrote:Goodbye Miller and Bud


I don't see Morey trading them. Budinger trade value is low, so you might as well keep him. Miller probably has some value, but unless a team gets desperate and overpays/bids, they'll keep him around due to loyalty (RA) and to mentor Hill. At least for now.

we finally have a 7 foot center (healthy to play)
i aint letting him go


who's shooting his best from the 3pt line, makes and %
x-
Analyst
Posts: 3,511
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 06, 2005

Re: 10 man rotation ain't gonna work 

Post#11 » by x- » Mon Dec 20, 2010 3:21 am

I woudn't be opposed to trading Miller at the deadline if the right offer comes along.

The guy turns 35 in April. If a team desperate for a big offers a late first I'd take it.
Sooner or later you'll have to put Patterson out there. Might as well do it now and cash in another asset to use in the off-season.
ikedog34
Sophomore
Posts: 132
And1: 68
Joined: Sep 29, 2008

Re: 10 man rotation ain't gonna work 

Post#12 » by ikedog34 » Mon Dec 20, 2010 4:50 am

Since the only shotblocker we have is Jordan (and Shane 'the Beast' Battier) the players have to expend more energy playing hustle position defense. Since we play the most back to backs, we'll need all the players getting minutes and staying fresh for the stretch run. I just can't figure how TWill will fit.
User avatar
MaxRider
RealGM
Posts: 44,473
And1: 5,805
Joined: Jun 08, 2005
Location: Choke City
 

Re: 10 man rotation ain't gonna work 

Post#13 » by MaxRider » Mon Dec 20, 2010 6:05 am

if we can get Andrew Bynum by trading Scola+Miller+scrub, will you do it?
rocketsballin
RealGM
Posts: 12,748
And1: 355
Joined: Mar 07, 2009

Re: 10 man rotation ain't gonna work 

Post#14 » by rocketsballin » Mon Dec 20, 2010 6:15 am

another injury proner? i've seen about half of you, maybe more, come up with trades for injury proners, or sign a free agent with a injury history. this may sound harsh but shouldnt it be inside your brains that you dont want any more injury proners? i know i wouldnt trade for one unless it's very cheap, low risk high reward, obviously slim to none chance of happening.

also when healthy bynum = scola. bynum's defense is the same as scola's offense, both are good at what they do, nothing special.
User avatar
Aaron Brooks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,148
And1: 629
Joined: Jan 14, 2008

Re: 10 man rotation ain't gonna work 

Post#15 » by Aaron Brooks » Mon Dec 20, 2010 6:39 am

I would keep Miller to be a Mentor. Miller, Battier, Hayes can teach our young guys so much. Bud needs to go though, hes regulated to a jump shooter. He's not utilizing his other tools (ballhandling, playmaking), and he gets lit up on defense.
baki wrote:Harden is essentially a very good role player, he's not a franchise player.
User avatar
College Boy
Analyst
Posts: 3,708
And1: 5
Joined: Jul 18, 2005
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: 10 man rotation ain't gonna work 

Post#16 » by College Boy » Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:01 am

This is the problem with being a very deep team. Everyone deserves minutes, but somebody is going to have to waste away on the bench. It's not very likely to be successful with a long rotation. As the season progresses, I do think we will shorten the bench. This is why I I am a fan of a consolidation move.
KiDdFrESh wrote:No way Utah passes up on a solid white guy at center. He'd be perfect fit for the Jazz.
User avatar
MaxRider
RealGM
Posts: 44,473
And1: 5,805
Joined: Jun 08, 2005
Location: Choke City
 

Re: 10 man rotation ain't gonna work 

Post#17 » by MaxRider » Mon Dec 20, 2010 6:15 pm

roxfashoballin wrote:another injury proner? i've seen about half of you, maybe more, come up with trades for injury proners, or sign a free agent with a injury history. this may sound harsh but shouldnt it be inside your brains that you dont want any more injury proners? i know i wouldnt trade for one unless it's very cheap, low risk high reward, obviously slim to none chance of happening.

also when healthy bynum = scola. bynum's defense is the same as scola's offense, both are good at what they do, nothing special.

Scola is BYC
making him very hard to trade this season
i was just trying to see how much you guys value a big tall black dude (a true 7 footer)
Hill is 6'9" without shoes so he's not a legit 7 footer
|llsT oNe
Starter
Posts: 2,264
And1: 165
Joined: Nov 13, 2004

Re: 10 man rotation ain't gonna work 

Post#18 » by |llsT oNe » Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:44 pm

I saw a similar thing happen with Portland. Prtichard kept on stockpiling assets and never cashed them in (assuming because he fell in love with them). He waited so long, players values were shot due to the depth, and he got blinded out of the game.

Not a Rockets fan, but I admire GM's with a fresh approach, so hopefully Morey has a better plan.
KiDdFrESh
General Manager
Posts: 9,763
And1: 46
Joined: Nov 22, 2001
Location: Screwston, TX

Re: 10 man rotation ain't gonna work 

Post#19 » by KiDdFrESh » Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:54 pm

We should trade for Gerald Wallace.
texasholdem
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,578
And1: 404
Joined: Feb 11, 2005

Re: 10 man rotation ain't gonna work 

Post#20 » by texasholdem » Mon Dec 20, 2010 11:02 pm

KiDdFrESh wrote:We should trade for Gerald Wallace.


Ironically Wallace was the 10th man in the rotation of that 2002 Kings team.
He and Funderburke only played in 5 of the playoff games however.
Harden is still a work-in-progress. He can score, but he can't help his teammate that much - Yao Ming

Return to Houston Rockets