Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
- abrewbro68
- Sophomore
- Posts: 226
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
Worst case scenario next season salary cap wise (although I would imagine it would help the team) is if Love continues to be a 20 and 10 player and Beasley raises his scoring average to 23-25 points a game. Then they will cost this team some serious money.
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
- teven_1
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,201
- And1: 16
- Joined: Jun 01, 2010
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
jade_hippo wrote:the Desmond Mason that looks washed up and doesn't get off the bench in OKC?
Guy can throw down. I was joking though. Roger Mason could actually help this squad a bit
"Look at me. I'm running like a young deer."- Andrei Kirilenko
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
- eyeteeth
- Starter
- Posts: 2,109
- And1: 147
- Joined: Jul 17, 2010
- Location: somewhere on the Front Range
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
teven_1 wrote:jade_hippo wrote:the Desmond Mason that looks washed up and doesn't get off the bench in OKC?
Guy can throw down. I was joking though. Roger Mason could actually help this squad a bit
Roger Mason of three years ago yes. Roger Mason 2011? That seems very unlikely.

Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,928
- And1: 17
- Joined: Sep 22, 2007
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
eyeteeth wrote:teven_1 wrote:jade_hippo wrote:the Desmond Mason that looks washed up and doesn't get off the bench in OKC?
Guy can throw down. I was joking though. Roger Mason could actually help this squad a bit
Roger Mason of three years ago yes. Roger Mason 2011? That seems very unlikely.
Agreed. I'm pretty sure his only decent year was with the Spurs and the Spurs make everyone look good. Right now I don't see what he would bring to the table that we couldn't try to get from Ellington.
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
- Foye
- Club Captain- German Soccer
- Posts: 25,067
- And1: 3,618
- Joined: Jul 29, 2008
- Location: Frankfurt
-
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
Roger Mason would never be more than a bench warmer. His time is over.
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
- AQuintus
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,425
- And1: 2,458
- Joined: Jan 10, 2008
- Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
-
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
Mason and Ariza are both great examples of why you shouldn't overpay for role players off of good teams.

Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,735
- And1: 325
- Joined: Jan 02, 2009
- Location: Northern Minnesota
-
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
AQuintus wrote:Mason and Ariza are both great examples of why you shouldn't overpay for role players off of good teams.
Mason is only making 1.4 mil. Ariza is making 6.3 mil. Ariza's offense isn't particularly efficient, but his all around game makes him a pretty solid wing.
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,971
- And1: 2,385
- Joined: May 20, 2009
-
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
Ariza is overpaid, but he's still a solid defender at least.
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
- Effigy
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,559
- And1: 13,814
- Joined: Nov 27, 2001
-
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
I think I'd hold onto that Jazz pick if I were you guys....
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,041
- And1: 14
- Joined: Oct 08, 2007
- Location: North Dakota
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
- AQuintus
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,425
- And1: 2,458
- Joined: Jan 10, 2008
- Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
-
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
Biff Cooper wrote:Mason is only making 1.4 mil.
1.4 million more than he should be making.

Ariza is making 6.3 mil. Ariza's offense isn't particularly efficient, but his all around game makes him a pretty solid wing.
Ariza was given that big contract by Houston because they thought that his play in LA was an indicator that he was finally coming around and developing into a borderline star player. They were completely wrong, however. His play was an indicator that he had a fairly small role with very little defensive attention because he was playing next to Kobe and Pau. In Houston, as the "man," he looked really bad. He's back to looking pretty decent again now, though, as a role player playing off of Chris Paul.
My main point was that I've seen Wolves fans here and elsewhere pining after role players on good teams like Afflalo, Dejaun Blair, and Lawson and I wouldn't be so sure that their production would transfer if they were forced to play here.

Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,885
- And1: 264
- Joined: Nov 13, 2010
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
Yep, Memphis pick has become the most expendable one since the protection ends with cash considerations. Utah pick protection ends with a pick swap.
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,885
- And1: 264
- Joined: Nov 13, 2010
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
AQuintus wrote:
My main point was that I've seen Wolves fans here and elsewhere pining after role players on good teams like Afflalo, Dejaun Blair, and Lawson and I wouldn't be so sure that their production would transfer if they were forced to play here.
I think Afflalo would be a great 3rd or 4th option anywhere. The dude can shoot and can play great D, and that is exactly what you are looking for in a 3rd or 4th option - to hit the open jumper. I dont expect him to be any more than that. The problem with Ariza is that Houston and NO tried to make him their main scoring wing, which is something that he simply couldnt do. As long as he is behind Love and Beasley and whoever in the scoring option list, then I think Afflalo would be great here - meaning a great role player here.
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,511
- And1: 6,584
- Joined: Dec 21, 2009
- Location: Land of Aus
-
Re: Wait what? Randolph and Mason for only a late first?
AQuintus wrote:Ariza was given that big contract by Houston because they thought that his play in LA was an indicator that he was finally coming around and developing into a borderline star player. They were completely wrong, however. His play was an indicator that he had a fairly small role with very little defensive attention because he was playing next to Kobe and Pau. In Houston, as the "man," he looked really bad. He's back to looking pretty decent again now, though, as a role player playing off of Chris Paul.
The difference is that he showed clear progress over his career, from his time with Orlando to his years with the Lakers. Houston took a calculated risk that he would continue improving and, yeah, they were wrong but that's no reason to stop taking risks like that.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves