[Camelo Thread Part 18] - Al Iannazone (Nets Are Back Pg 77)

Dr. Detfink · Post #1181 » by **Dr. Detfink** » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:06 am

This is simple. If Melo agrees to go to the Nyets, it's CLEAR he's about the money and not about the winning. But if he still insists on the Knicks, then you know this IS the guy you want to compliment Amare's desire. It's all in Melo's court.

I don't see this Melo deal just about the Knicks fortunes but CLEARLY it's a study about Melo's character and determination.

ny41101 · Post #1182 » by **ny41101** » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:06 am

Melo brought this upon himself he should have just kept his mouth shut and chances are he would be a Knick right now without NY giving up so much, that being said I think he still ends up in a Knicks uniform.

AllanHoustonFan · Post #1183 » by **AllanHoustonFan** » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:07 am

KBerg_CBS Ken Berger
Person familiar with Nuggets-Nets talks describes them as "exploratory" on Denver's part. On scale of 1-5, source says, "Back to level 1."

rammagen · Post #1184 » by **rammagen** » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:07 am

so much crap is flying around now. Look at the wiretap about Dallis being the only team to stop this. Now the nots. F this crap let's get a center and back up pg at this point I am over this crap. Melo needs to come out and make the statement publicly about wanting to play in NYC he does that all this crap is over. If he doesn't then he does not want to be here bad enough.
IMHO NJ should string them along and then f them the way the nugs did it to them

Post #1185 » by **knicks742** » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:07 am

As it has been all along, it's up to Melo. If he wants the Nyets and his extension, I will not cry one tear.

Post #1186 » by **moocow007** » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:07 am

In poker terms id call the bluff. Go ahead.

god shammgod · Post #1187 » by **god shammgod** » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:08 am

AllanHoustonFan wrote:KBerg_CBS Ken Berger
Person familiar with Nuggets-Nets talks describes them as "exploratory" on Denver's part. On scale of 1-5, source says, "Back to level 1."

so they made a phone call. lets all panic.

Marty McFly · Post #1188 » by **Marty McFly** » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:08 am

gee, thanks, zeke.

AllanHoustonFan · Post #1189 » by **AllanHoustonFan** » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:09 am

Chris_Broussard Chris Broussard
Sources say Denver and NJ began Melo trade talks again about a week ago. Source says NJ 1st to reach out. No meeting btwn Melo & NJ set yet

lmfao...someone is lying

disruptv3 · Post #1190 » by **disruptv3** » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:09 am

im sure melo wants to play for a headcoach who has more influence then the gm & just recently stated that he (Melo) wasnt even a top talent so why is everyone fussing over him

Pharmcat · Post #1191 » by **Pharmcat** » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:10 am

Dr. Detfink wrote:This is simple. If Melo agrees to go to the Nyets, it's CLEAR he's about the money and not about the winning. But if he still insists on the Knicks, then you know this IS the guy you want to compliment Amare's desire. It's all in Melo's court.

I don't see this Melo deal just about the Knicks fortunes but CLEARLY it's a study about Melo's character and determination.

i love how people kill melo whenever another team pops up...its not melo fault ny hasnt gotten a deal yet even though he has ny given 7 months to do so

and amare came here for the money (no one else giving him 5 guaranteed years), so whats wrong with melo wanting his?

Post #1192 » by **mpharris36** » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:10 am

god shammgod wrote:
AllanHoustonFan wrote:KBerg_CBS Ken Berger
Person familiar with Nuggets-Nets talks describes them as "exploratory" on Denver's part. On scale of 1-5, source says, "Back to level 1."

so they made a phone call. lets all panic.

thank you glad someone has some sense!

disruptv3 · Post #1193 » by **disruptv3** » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:10 am

knicks742 wrote:As it has been all along, it's up to Melo. If he wants the Nyets and his extension, I will not cry one tear.

+1

Liberty · Post #1194 » by **Liberty** » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:10 am

All of you who are trying to show how much 'you don't care'.... you do realise that if we don't get Melo, regardless of the deal, that Donnie is gone don't you?

I'm not being funny but I'd rather have Melo, STAT and a few other good players like Fields, Moz, Shawne, TD with Donnie as GM able to build the roster.

Than our current roster with, probably, Isiah.

KnickelandDime · Post #1195 » by **KnickelandDime** » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:11 am

Every story that has Melo connected to another team is just Denver trying to scoop up some leverage. The only one I acknowledge whatsoever is the Dallas one as he could resign, they have the pieces( Butler, Beaubois, Jones and a couple of picks) and he somewhat fits (start Kidd, Stevenson, Melo, Dirk and Tyson with Barea, Terry, Marion, and Haywood off the bench). The Nets are not a threat. They weren't a month ago and they're not now.

ElTuco84 · Post #1196 » by **ElTuco84** » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:13 am

I'm so happy this thing will be over in eight days.

disruptv3 · Post #1197 » by **disruptv3** » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:13 am

Pharmcat wrote:
Dr. Detfink wrote:This is simple. If Melo agrees to go to the Nyets, it's CLEAR he's about the money and not about the winning. But if he still insists on the Knicks, then you know this IS the guy you want to compliment Amare's desire. It's all in Melo's court.

I don't see this Melo deal just about the Knicks fortunes but CLEARLY it's a study about Melo's character and determination.

i love how people kill melo whenever another team pops up...its not melo fault ny hasnt gotten a deal yet even though he has ny given 7 months to do so

and amare came here for the money (no one else giving him 5 guaranteed years), so whats wrong with melo wanting his?

so ur saying its ny's fault then? even though Denver and donnie went on record to say that the knicks had no assests that they were interested in?

Jay10 · Post #1198 » by **Jay10** » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:14 am

AllanHoustonFan wrote:Chris_Broussard Chris Broussard
Sources say Denver and NJ began Melo trade talks again about a week ago. Source says NJ 1st to reach out. No meeting btwn Melo & NJ set yet

lmfao...someone is lying

one reporter said the nuggets reached out to the nets, now broussard says the nets reached out to the nuggets.

everyone isn't born to be a good liar.

lmao

disruptv3 · Post #1199 » by **disruptv3** » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:14 am

Liberty wrote:All of you who are trying to show how much 'you don't care'.... you do realise that if we don't get Melo, regardless of the deal, that Donnie is gone don't you?

I'm not being funny but I'd rather have Melo, STAT and a few other good players like Fields, Moz, Shawne, TD with Donnie as GM able to build the roster.

Than our current roster with, probably, Isiah.

hmmmm...interesting point

Pharmcat · Post #1200 » by **Pharmcat** » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:14 am

disruptv3 wrote:
Pharmcat wrote:
Dr. Detfink wrote:This is simple. If Melo agrees to go to the Nyets, it's CLEAR he's about the money and not about the winning. But if he still insists on the Knicks, then you know this IS the guy you want to compliment Amare's desire. It's all in Melo's court.

I don't see this Melo deal just about the Knicks fortunes but CLEARLY it's a study about Melo's character and determination.

i love how people kill melo whenever another team pops up...its not melo fault ny hasnt gotten a deal yet even though he has ny given 7 months to do so

and amare came here for the money (no one else giving him 5 guaranteed years), so whats wrong with melo wanting his?

so ur saying its ny's fault then? even though Denver and donnie went on record to say that the knicks had no assests that they were interested in?

they made an offer Mon night