
for

or

As MIN is looking at the lottery more than winning, they don't really need Ridnour, and could be interest to play Teague a lot and see what he can do with playing time, and responsibilities on the floor, without the pressure of a "winning team" like here.
On Webster, he has less potential than Marvin, but can fill his role, which doesn't allow Marvin to reach his potential anyway.
He's more a SG-SF, while Marvin is can play PF, and Marvin is a better rebounder.
For the superstitious, we trade the one who was picked before Paul and Williams (and Felton), for the pick of the team that traded down from 3 to 6 and also pass on these 3 PGs.
Maybe it would be better to change Webster by Corey Brewer, pairing him again with Al, and he seems to be a good energizer.
Higher than Webster, but a worst rebounder. Maybe a better defender though, but not on big SFs.
Ridnour/Bibby
Joe/Crawford
Brewer or Webster/Evans
Josh/Al
Al/Collins/Zaza
Actually, I like more this trade if it was combined with another like Josh for Bynum,
but what do you think of that ?