ImageImage

We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.

Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver

parson
RealGM
Posts: 10,316
And1: 469
Joined: May 02, 2001

We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year. 

Post#1 » by parson » Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:11 pm

I know, moral victory and all that stuff, but I am beginning to notice improved play from Hinrich and Teague so far as running the team. It's going to turn out that we traded for Hinrich too late for this year. Hinrich's starting to LEAD the offense rather than just trying to fit in and ... TEAGUE, Teague's vision seems to be improving. When he comes in, he greatly speeds up play, especially on offense but even on defense.

Maybe we'll finally start running (with all those athletes).
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
azuresou1
Head Coach
Posts: 7,444
And1: 1,095
Joined: Jun 15, 2009
   

Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year. 

Post#2 » by azuresou1 » Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:33 pm

Doubt it. I have no faith in this organization at all.

Bet we trade Teague too.
parson
RealGM
Posts: 10,316
And1: 469
Joined: May 02, 2001

Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year. 

Post#3 » by parson » Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:59 pm

That's too easy. As per my OP, do you see Hinrich becoming more of a leader? Do you see improvement in Teague?

If you don't, fine. But if you see what I see, won't we be better when we have 2 strong defensively, athletic, good PGs? Call me crazy, but I see a really good PG inside Teague: super fast, super quick, looong arms, good hands, good leaping ability, good one-on-one offensive skills and truly superior defensive gifts.
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
parson
RealGM
Posts: 10,316
And1: 469
Joined: May 02, 2001

Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year. 

Post#4 » by parson » Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:02 pm

Did you add the "Bet we trade Teague too." line while I was typing?

If we do, and it's for a true PG, I'd be okay. But I'm really starting to hope we let him develop. The kid is Mookie Blaylock with less strength but a better fastbreak. Teague's a one-man fastbreak.
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
User avatar
Geaux_Hawks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,473
And1: 1,154
Joined: Feb 18, 2011
     

Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year. 

Post#5 » by Geaux_Hawks » Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:55 pm

Should have gotten Hinrich in a 3 way with Chi-Washington. Probably could have saved our pick(s)
azuresou1
Head Coach
Posts: 7,444
And1: 1,095
Joined: Jun 15, 2009
   

Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year. 

Post#6 » by azuresou1 » Thu Apr 28, 2011 5:24 pm

Nope, it was in my original post. Bet we trade him for scraps too.
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year. 

Post#7 » by Ruhiel » Fri Apr 29, 2011 6:53 pm

parson wrote:Did you add the "Bet we trade Teague too." line while I was typing?

If we do, and it's for a true PG, I'd be okay. But I'm really starting to hope we let him develop. The kid is Mookie Blaylock with less strength but a better fastbreak. Teague's a one-man fastbreak.


Key is using change of pace to get gobs of fouls. In the halfcourt though I thought he would be unstoppable off pick and rolls by now. Potential is still there tho...
parson
RealGM
Posts: 10,316
And1: 469
Joined: May 02, 2001

Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year. 

Post#8 » by parson » Fri Apr 29, 2011 7:01 pm

azuresou1 wrote:Nope, it was in my original post. Bet we trade him for scraps too.

Hope you're wrong.
Worried you're not.
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
parson
RealGM
Posts: 10,316
And1: 469
Joined: May 02, 2001

Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year. 

Post#9 » by parson » Fri Apr 29, 2011 7:13 pm

Anyone notice how similar Hinrich and Teague are? If we wanted to, we could run 48 minutes of one, consistent style of play.
Both are gifted defensively.
Both are not true PGs.
Both can get to the basket, almost at will.
Both can get their shot off when they're close to the hoop.
Both are pretty good from 3.

Both can run.
I know Drew's scared of running but come on. Take look at our roster.
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
azuresou1
Head Coach
Posts: 7,444
And1: 1,095
Joined: Jun 15, 2009
   

Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year. 

Post#10 » by azuresou1 » Fri Apr 29, 2011 8:10 pm

Teague is pretty awful from 3, and is also very hesitant to shoot. Tons of times he'll catch it at the top of the arc wide open, and instead of taking it, he'll dribble, wait for his man to close in and get a solid defensive stance, and then drive.

He also doesn't know when to float and when to take it all the way in.
parson
RealGM
Posts: 10,316
And1: 469
Joined: May 02, 2001

Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year. 

Post#11 » by parson » Fri Apr 29, 2011 9:38 pm

37.5% is not bad, much less "pretty awful."
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
johnny878
Senior
Posts: 685
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 27, 2008

Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year. 

Post#12 » by johnny878 » Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:30 pm

azuresou1 wrote:Teague is pretty awful from 3, and is also very hesitant to shoot. Tons of times he'll catch it at the top of the arc wide open, and instead of taking it, he'll dribble, wait for his man to close in and get a solid defensive stance, and then drive.

He also doesn't know when to float and when to take it all the way in.


cept hinrich is twice the shooter teague is, thus making him an effective basketball player whereas the jury is still out with teague
parson
RealGM
Posts: 10,316
And1: 469
Joined: May 02, 2001

Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year. 

Post#13 » by parson » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:53 am

Not sure Hinrich's "twice the shooter Teague is" although I wish it were true. Teague's vision is lacking, so far as being a PG goes, but his offensive game is better than Hinrich's, at least that's what I see.
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
FCNATL85
Starter
Posts: 2,341
And1: 12
Joined: Jul 10, 2003

Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year. 

Post#14 » by FCNATL85 » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:15 pm

I do hpe indeed that Kirk injury will give a lot more PT to JT2 as a starter and will build his confidence.
He needs to asser himself and show some mean aggressivness rather than his passive-beat up demeanor.
In that sense for sure he differs a lot from Mookie.

That being said, and granted that it was in regular season and usually meaningless games,
he had some good outings when starting and playing 30 minutes +.
Good luck to him for the first 2 games. On a personal level, an incredible chance for him to show the world what he can do.
On a team level, an opportunity to extend the rotation, JT2, Marv and Damian should be the players benefiting the most from it...
After all, let's remember that Rose is not full speed (well...) but that at least Boozer should be handicaped somehow... Take adavantage of it and shock the world!
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year. 

Post#15 » by Ruhiel » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:46 pm

Damian Wilkins is terrible, he can defend but he provides no perimeter shooting or slashing. Keep rotation Marvin, Joe, and Josh on the wings and sometimes Jamal if Teague can run the pnR. Keep Noah off the boards. Give our bigs a chance to get us extra possessions for Jamal and Joe.
parson
RealGM
Posts: 10,316
And1: 469
Joined: May 02, 2001

Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year. 

Post#16 » by parson » Tue May 3, 2011 8:11 pm

Ahem.
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year. 

Post#17 » by Ruhiel » Tue May 3, 2011 10:00 pm

Ruhiel wrote:
parson wrote:Did you add the "Bet we trade Teague too." line while I was typing?

If we do, and it's for a true PG, I'd be okay. But I'm really starting to hope we let him develop. The kid is Mookie Blaylock with less strength but a better fastbreak. Teague's a one-man fastbreak.


Key is using change of pace to get gobs of fouls. In the halfcourt though I thought he would be unstoppable off pick and rolls by now. Potential is still there tho...


^2K8 halfcourt simulator predictions :lol::lol: that simulator was the most realistic in 1/2court imo.

Anyways, Chris Paul + Dunks = Jeff Teague :laugh:
wow if his offensive awareness and willingness to pass ever increase, yikes.

Return to Atlanta Hawks