We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver
We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,316
- And1: 469
- Joined: May 02, 2001
We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
I know, moral victory and all that stuff, but I am beginning to notice improved play from Hinrich and Teague so far as running the team. It's going to turn out that we traded for Hinrich too late for this year. Hinrich's starting to LEAD the offense rather than just trying to fit in and ... TEAGUE, Teague's vision seems to be improving. When he comes in, he greatly speeds up play, especially on offense but even on defense.
Maybe we'll finally start running (with all those athletes).
Maybe we'll finally start running (with all those athletes).
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,444
- And1: 1,095
- Joined: Jun 15, 2009
-
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
Doubt it. I have no faith in this organization at all.
Bet we trade Teague too.
Bet we trade Teague too.
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,316
- And1: 469
- Joined: May 02, 2001
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
That's too easy. As per my OP, do you see Hinrich becoming more of a leader? Do you see improvement in Teague?
If you don't, fine. But if you see what I see, won't we be better when we have 2 strong defensively, athletic, good PGs? Call me crazy, but I see a really good PG inside Teague: super fast, super quick, looong arms, good hands, good leaping ability, good one-on-one offensive skills and truly superior defensive gifts.
If you don't, fine. But if you see what I see, won't we be better when we have 2 strong defensively, athletic, good PGs? Call me crazy, but I see a really good PG inside Teague: super fast, super quick, looong arms, good hands, good leaping ability, good one-on-one offensive skills and truly superior defensive gifts.
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,316
- And1: 469
- Joined: May 02, 2001
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
Did you add the "Bet we trade Teague too." line while I was typing?
If we do, and it's for a true PG, I'd be okay. But I'm really starting to hope we let him develop. The kid is Mookie Blaylock with less strength but a better fastbreak. Teague's a one-man fastbreak.
If we do, and it's for a true PG, I'd be okay. But I'm really starting to hope we let him develop. The kid is Mookie Blaylock with less strength but a better fastbreak. Teague's a one-man fastbreak.
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
- Geaux_Hawks
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,473
- And1: 1,154
- Joined: Feb 18, 2011
-
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
Should have gotten Hinrich in a 3 way with Chi-Washington. Probably could have saved our pick(s)
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,444
- And1: 1,095
- Joined: Jun 15, 2009
-
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
Nope, it was in my original post. Bet we trade him for scraps too.
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
- Ruhiel
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,502
- And1: 45
- Joined: Dec 28, 2010
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
parson wrote:Did you add the "Bet we trade Teague too." line while I was typing?
If we do, and it's for a true PG, I'd be okay. But I'm really starting to hope we let him develop. The kid is Mookie Blaylock with less strength but a better fastbreak. Teague's a one-man fastbreak.
Key is using change of pace to get gobs of fouls. In the halfcourt though I thought he would be unstoppable off pick and rolls by now. Potential is still there tho...
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,316
- And1: 469
- Joined: May 02, 2001
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
azuresou1 wrote:Nope, it was in my original post. Bet we trade him for scraps too.
Hope you're wrong.
Worried you're not.
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,316
- And1: 469
- Joined: May 02, 2001
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
Anyone notice how similar Hinrich and Teague are? If we wanted to, we could run 48 minutes of one, consistent style of play.
Both are gifted defensively.
Both are not true PGs.
Both can get to the basket, almost at will.
Both can get their shot off when they're close to the hoop.
Both are pretty good from 3.
Both can run.
I know Drew's scared of running but come on. Take look at our roster.
Both are gifted defensively.
Both are not true PGs.
Both can get to the basket, almost at will.
Both can get their shot off when they're close to the hoop.
Both are pretty good from 3.
Both can run.
I know Drew's scared of running but come on. Take look at our roster.
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,444
- And1: 1,095
- Joined: Jun 15, 2009
-
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
Teague is pretty awful from 3, and is also very hesitant to shoot. Tons of times he'll catch it at the top of the arc wide open, and instead of taking it, he'll dribble, wait for his man to close in and get a solid defensive stance, and then drive.
He also doesn't know when to float and when to take it all the way in.
He also doesn't know when to float and when to take it all the way in.
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,316
- And1: 469
- Joined: May 02, 2001
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
37.5% is not bad, much less "pretty awful."
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
-
- Senior
- Posts: 685
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
azuresou1 wrote:Teague is pretty awful from 3, and is also very hesitant to shoot. Tons of times he'll catch it at the top of the arc wide open, and instead of taking it, he'll dribble, wait for his man to close in and get a solid defensive stance, and then drive.
He also doesn't know when to float and when to take it all the way in.
cept hinrich is twice the shooter teague is, thus making him an effective basketball player whereas the jury is still out with teague
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,316
- And1: 469
- Joined: May 02, 2001
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
Not sure Hinrich's "twice the shooter Teague is" although I wish it were true. Teague's vision is lacking, so far as being a PG goes, but his offensive game is better than Hinrich's, at least that's what I see.
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,341
- And1: 12
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
I do hpe indeed that Kirk injury will give a lot more PT to JT2 as a starter and will build his confidence.
He needs to asser himself and show some mean aggressivness rather than his passive-beat up demeanor.
In that sense for sure he differs a lot from Mookie.
That being said, and granted that it was in regular season and usually meaningless games,
he had some good outings when starting and playing 30 minutes +.
Good luck to him for the first 2 games. On a personal level, an incredible chance for him to show the world what he can do.
On a team level, an opportunity to extend the rotation, JT2, Marv and Damian should be the players benefiting the most from it...
After all, let's remember that Rose is not full speed (well...) but that at least Boozer should be handicaped somehow... Take adavantage of it and shock the world!
He needs to asser himself and show some mean aggressivness rather than his passive-beat up demeanor.
In that sense for sure he differs a lot from Mookie.
That being said, and granted that it was in regular season and usually meaningless games,
he had some good outings when starting and playing 30 minutes +.
Good luck to him for the first 2 games. On a personal level, an incredible chance for him to show the world what he can do.
On a team level, an opportunity to extend the rotation, JT2, Marv and Damian should be the players benefiting the most from it...
After all, let's remember that Rose is not full speed (well...) but that at least Boozer should be handicaped somehow... Take adavantage of it and shock the world!
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
- Ruhiel
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,502
- And1: 45
- Joined: Dec 28, 2010
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
Damian Wilkins is terrible, he can defend but he provides no perimeter shooting or slashing. Keep rotation Marvin, Joe, and Josh on the wings and sometimes Jamal if Teague can run the pnR. Keep Noah off the boards. Give our bigs a chance to get us extra possessions for Jamal and Joe.
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,316
- And1: 469
- Joined: May 02, 2001
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
Ahem.
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
- Ruhiel
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,502
- And1: 45
- Joined: Dec 28, 2010
Re: We're going to be MUCH better at PG next year.
Ruhiel wrote:parson wrote:Did you add the "Bet we trade Teague too." line while I was typing?
If we do, and it's for a true PG, I'd be okay. But I'm really starting to hope we let him develop. The kid is Mookie Blaylock with less strength but a better fastbreak. Teague's a one-man fastbreak.
Key is using change of pace to get gobs of fouls. In the halfcourt though I thought he would be unstoppable off pick and rolls by now. Potential is still there tho...
^2K8 halfcourt simulator predictions

Anyways, Chris Paul + Dunks = Jeff Teague

wow if his offensive awareness and willingness to pass ever increase, yikes.