ImageImage

JJ contract does it still look so bad?

Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver

User avatar
Geaux_Hawks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,473
And1: 1,154
Joined: Feb 18, 2011
     

Re: JJ contract does it still look so bad? 

Post#21 » by Geaux_Hawks » Wed May 4, 2011 6:05 pm

wizardg wrote:Hawks had to pay Joe if they wanted to be a player in the post season.

The contracts that hurt them were/are Bibby, Marvin and Zaza. They over paid for all of them more so than Joe. Those three contracts add up to a max contract - for what!


Flip Murray was as effecticve maybe more than Bibby. Mo Evans was as effective as Marvin - he had a smaller skill set but he was smarter and consistent. Who started against the Magic? Twin not Zaza. To get away from Bibby they gave away Jordan Crawford. That hurts.

Agains signing Bibby, Marvin, and Zaza was the mistake each has proven to be worth about 40% of their salaries.
If you look at all the player who have recieved max contracts in the last five years Joe is better than a lot of them. People forget about the Ray allens, JO's, Vinces, Kirlenko's, Mcgradys etc.


This takes the cake. The only argument you can make is that he should have gotten 20 million less, but other than, who else would you have paid? I think Horford can be mention with those guys above as being "mistakes". He recently just got 12 million dollars a year, while guys like David West, Paul Milsap, Scola, Lamar Odom, Perkins and even the head case Andray Blatche get paid less. LMA is way better IMO and he will be making only 4 million more than Horford. Smith ain't no 11-13 million dollar man, but we were forced to accept that. Management did the right thing in trying to keep Joe. They messed up with the extension they gave to others.
HoopsGuru25
General Manager
Posts: 9,321
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 18, 2006

Re: JJ contract does it still look so bad? 

Post#22 » by HoopsGuru25 » Wed May 4, 2011 6:13 pm

The post above makes no sense. The Hawks got a bargain with Smith and Horford and wildly overpaid for Joe. The Hawks got Horford for 20 million less than David Lee and Rudy gay on that same market(depsite him having a huge QO the next year)and got Smith for less money than Emeka Okafor,Luol Deng,and Iguodala the same year despite him being the best of that bunch. If Brand didnt shock everyone by leaving the Clippers(after they signed Baron)then the Hawks probably would have been competing with a 70 million dollar offer from Philly! Both of these were huge wins by the Hawks in negotiations.

The Hawks gave Joe the biggest contract of the summer in what was probably the best year for free agents in the history of professional basketball. One year and 30+ million more than any other team could have offered w/o a sign and trade. Giving Bibby 3 guaranteed years was stupid as well when players like Andre Miller and Ramon Sessions got less money on the same market.
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: JJ contract does it still look so bad? 

Post#23 » by Ruhiel » Wed May 4, 2011 6:41 pm

Geaux_Hawks wrote:
wizardg wrote:Hawks had to pay Joe if they wanted to be a player in the post season.

The contracts that hurt them were/are Bibby, Marvin and Zaza. They over paid for all of them more so than Joe. Those three contracts add up to a max contract - for what!


Flip Murray was as effecticve maybe more than Bibby. Mo Evans was as effective as Marvin - he had a smaller skill set but he was smarter and consistent. Who started against the Magic? Twin not Zaza. To get away from Bibby they gave away Jordan Crawford. That hurts.

Agains signing Bibby, Marvin, and Zaza was the mistake each has proven to be worth about 40% of their salaries.
If you look at all the player who have recieved max contracts in the last five years Joe is better than a lot of them. People forget about the Ray allens, JO's, Vinces, Kirlenko's, Mcgradys etc.


This takes the cake. The only argument you can make is that he should have gotten 20 million less, but other than, who else would you have paid? I think Horford can be mention with those guys above as being "mistakes". He recently just got 12 million dollars a year, while guys like David West, Paul Milsap, Scola, Lamar Odom, Perkins and even the head case Andray Blatche get paid less. LMA is way better IMO and he will be making only 4 million more than Horford. Smith ain't no 11-13 million dollar man, but we were forced to accept that. Management did the right thing in trying to keep Joe. They messed up with the extension they gave to others.


Al Horford has a better Defense per 100 possessions and Offensive per 100 possessions. Lamarcus Bottom line on LMA? Aldridge gives up more points than he scores. fail. Only Perkins is in the post season fail.
Millsap is great but Smith has played SF, PF, and Center in 7 games. we're winning cut it out!

I do see problems going forward as soon as next series but the onus is on ownership to improve, the team.
User avatar
Geaux_Hawks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,473
And1: 1,154
Joined: Feb 18, 2011
     

Re: JJ contract does it still look so bad? 

Post#24 » by Geaux_Hawks » Wed May 4, 2011 7:34 pm

HoopsGuru25 wrote:The post above makes no sense. The Hawks got a bargain with Smith and Horford and wildly overpaid for Joe. The Hawks got Horford for 20 million less than David Lee and Rudy gay on that same market(depsite him having a huge QO the next year)and got Smith for less money than Emeka Okafor,Luol Deng,and Iguodala the same year despite him being the best of that bunch. If Brand didnt shock everyone by leaving the Clippers(after they signed Baron)then the Hawks probably would have been competing with a 70 million dollar offer from Philly! Both of these were huge wins by the Hawks in negotiations.

The Hawks gave Joe the biggest contract of the summer in what was probably the best year for free agents in the history of professional basketball. One year and 30+ million more than any other team could have offered w/o a sign and trade. Giving Bibby 3 guaranteed years was stupid as well when players like Andre Miller and Ramon Sessions got less money on the same market.


A Bargain with Smith? Yes. Bargain with Horford? Somewhat yeah. Could we have had him cheaper? I think so. At the most we should have gave him 5/50. David Lee obviously got overpaid(Should have got something similar to Al got) and Rudy Gay is a young top-5 SF. Maybe he should have gotten a little less, but he is a great scorer, can hit the 3, an above average rebounder, a good defender and is only 24. Deng has a similar deal to Josh and should have gotten lesser, but a year longer. Philly was looking for a veteran obviously, so Josh wouldn't have gotten an offer that big.

Horford's AS appearances got him that contract. In a conference that didn't have a healthy enough #2 Center or one on a winning team, Horford gets selected with 14/9 stats just because he played Center for a winning team. LMA had 22/9 with 1.2 blocks this year and is making just a few extra millions and he plays against a lot of centers. Who do you think would have offered Al a bigger deal than what he got on those numbers? We won the negotiations, but could have faired better.
johnny878
Senior
Posts: 685
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 27, 2008

Re: JJ contract does it still look so bad? 

Post#25 » by johnny878 » Wed May 4, 2011 7:39 pm

zaza's contract really isnt that bad. i would give to him again if i had the chance of a redo, the same cant be said for marvin,bibby, or joe.
User avatar
Geaux_Hawks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,473
And1: 1,154
Joined: Feb 18, 2011
     

Re: JJ contract does it still look so bad? 

Post#26 » by Geaux_Hawks » Wed May 4, 2011 7:43 pm

Ruhiel wrote:
Geaux_Hawks wrote:a lot of them. People forget about the Ray allens, JO's, Vinces, Kirlenko's, Mcgradys etc.


This takes the cake. The only argument you can make is that he should have gotten 20 million less, but other than, who else would you have paid? I think Horford can be mention with those guys above as being "mistakes". He recently just got 12 million dollars a year, while guys like David West, Paul Milsap, Scola, Lamar Odom, Perkins and even the head case Andray Blatche get paid less. LMA is way better IMO and he will be making only 4 million more than Horford. Smith ain't no 11-13 million dollar man, but we were forced to accept that. Management did the right thing in trying to keep Joe. They messed up with the extension they gave to others.


Al Horford has a better Defense per 100 possessions and Offensive per 100 possessions. Lamarcus Bottom line on LMA? Aldridge gives up more points than he scores. fail. Only Perkins is in the post season fail.
Millsap is great but Smith has played SF, PF, and Center in 7 games. we're winning cut it out!

I do see problems going forward as soon as next series but the onus is on ownership to improve, the team.[/quote]

NO made the playoffs, but West was hurt during the series. Can argue he would have made a difference. Odom, plays for the Lakers. Milsaps had a playoff team before the Sloan/Deron fiasco. Rockets could have made the playoffs in the East. I never said I wanted Milsaps over Smith.
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: JJ contract does it still look so bad? 

Post#27 » by Ruhiel » Wed May 4, 2011 8:45 pm

well I'm saying Smith & Horf are worth 11-13 milion dollars.
David West is 30, Odom 30+
Rockets could have made the playoffs in the East but Scola would have missed it injured.

I think most teams would be glad to trade 4 those 2 contracts given the ability to play multiple positions and produce wins at a younger age.
User avatar
Geaux_Hawks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,473
And1: 1,154
Joined: Feb 18, 2011
     

Re: JJ contract does it still look so bad? 

Post#28 » by Geaux_Hawks » Wed May 4, 2011 10:53 pm

Ruhiel wrote:well I'm saying Smith & Horf are worth 11-13 milion dollars.
David West is 30, Odom 30+
Rockets could have made the playoffs in the East but Scola would have missed it injured.

I think most teams would be glad to trade 4 those 2 contracts given the ability to play multiple positions and produce wins at a younger age.


They are still on acceptable deals, but the difference in signing 2-3 million dollars cheaper is very significant. If Al signs a 5/50 deal, we can easily have 2 million more in flexibility. If we re-sign Marv and Zaza for cheaper deals, we can have that money. Unfortunately, half the roster is overpaid. We had no other choice, but match Memphis offer for Josh, but he expires soon. Would really be nice if he signs like a 9 or 10 mill a year deal. Hopefully he thinks about the situation the Hawks finances are in.

Return to Atlanta Hawks