5DOM wrote:Taj Gibson best case scenario? Are you kidding?
Read what I said, not for Biyombo, but you clearly don't know how good Taj Gibson is.
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
5DOM wrote:Taj Gibson best case scenario? Are you kidding?
5DOM wrote:Taj Gibson best case scenario? Are you kidding?
fredericklove wrote:Zarko wrote:Kemba and Knight don't do anything Bayless can't. All 3 have poor court vision, are good at creating their own shot but don't have explosiveness to really put teams in trouble.
Unless were getting a sure fire dynamic point guard, we shouldn't burn a pick on one. That leaves Biyombo, Kanter, Jonas, Vesely. Jonas looks like he needs 3-5 years to develop and Kanter has a bunch of ? marks. Don't know much about Vesely or Biyombo so this draft is a mystery to me.
Kemba was a pass-first point guard coming into his 1st two year but 3rd year all veterans were gone leaving him to take the whole offensive load in the team comprised of all new freshmens. He was pretty much known for having a good court vision throughout his high school and 1st two years at college and Kemba's quickness and speed makes him quite explosive. So go read draftexpress or go watch his games live before making accusation on Kemba.

Youngblood wrote:5DOM wrote:Taj Gibson best case scenario? Are you kidding?
Read what I said, not for Biyombo, but you clearly don't know how good Taj Gibson is.
5DOM wrote:Youngblood wrote:5DOM wrote:Taj Gibson best case scenario? Are you kidding?
Read what I said, not for Biyombo, but you clearly don't know how good Taj Gibson is.
Or you are clearly overrating Taj Gibson. Even in a weak draft like this one, it's not crazy to think a potential top 5 pick's worst case scenario is him. Biyombo's easily the superior prospect to Gibson when he was drafted.
ty123 wrote:Alec Burks also has a pretty high ceiling as well. Brandon Roy best case scenario.

5DOM wrote:I've obviously watched Taj Gibson both in college and in the NBA, but proven or not Taj Gibson can't be the best case scenario for a potential top 5 player even in a weak draft like this one
Gibson (25y/o sophomore) is averaging 7/6/1 on 50TS% and 14.3PER.
I think those two dunks he had against Miami made you guys believe he's some amazing player.
ty123 wrote:Alec Burks also has a pretty high ceiling as well. Brandon Roy best case scenario.

bboyskinnylegs wrote:ty123 wrote:Alec Burks also has a pretty high ceiling as well. Brandon Roy best case scenario.
he does, although I think #5 is too high for him personally, and there's better options with our pick. I wonder if we could run a lineup with Bayless/Burks/DeMar... or would that be too small?
5DOM wrote:I've obviously watched Taj Gibson both in college and in the NBA, but proven or not Taj Gibson can't be the best case scenario for a potential top 5 player even in a weak draft like this one
Gibson (25y/o sophomore) is averaging 7/6/1 on 50TS% and 14.3PER.
I think those two dunks he had against Miami made you guys believe he's some amazing player.
JonathanG wrote:mid-post wrote:I think player comparisons should be thought of more as a style comparison rather than how the prospect will pan out statistically. Because the latter is ridiculously difficult to predict. That's how I give my player comparisons anyway.
The problem is that you can't explain that every time, so people take them way too literally. Nevertheless, I will try to post comparisons for at least the top-20 guys in the draft, if not more.
bboyskinnylegs wrote:ty123 wrote:Alec Burks also has a pretty high ceiling as well. Brandon Roy best case scenario.
he does, although I think #5 is too high for him personally, and there's better options with our pick. I wonder if we could run a lineup with Bayless/Burks/DeMar... or would that be too small?
5DOM wrote:So what you are saying is that there shouldn't be a worst case scenario for anyone because none of these kids are proven.
No, what I'm saying is that calling Taj Gibson a worst case scenario for a guy who's high risk, high reward (which means his floor is an absolute bust, NOT Taj Gibson) is a joke. If that were true, Biyombo would be top-3, like I said, fairly easily in a draft that's apparently this weak. It's completely undervaluing what Gibson does for his team. Just use common sense. Knowing what you know; if you could get a prospect with the worst case scenario guaranteed to be Taj Gibson in this draft don't you take him right after Irving and Williams? Now look at where Biyombo is projected. It's that easy!