ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread XVI: 5/3/11 - 6/29/11

Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33

LyricalRico
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 30,560
And1: 851
Joined: May 23, 2002
Location: Back into the fray!
Contact:
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XVI 

Post#1321 » by LyricalRico » Fri Jun 17, 2011 3:00 pm

^ Interesting. So something like Milsap+12 for Hickson+4? Could make sense if Utah likes Vesely as the next Kirilenko, or if they want Kanter/Valanciunas to replace Okur. Knight at 3 and Kanter/Valanciunas/Vesely at 4 is a pretty good haul IMO.

I don't see TOR doing it since they apparently want to move Bargs to PF.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XVI 

Post#1322 » by Ruzious » Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:01 pm

Milsap's a good solid player. The problem I have with acquiring him is paying around 7 mil each of his remaining 2 contracted years and then having to extend him at probably a raise. He's good to have on your team, but do you want to commit that kind of money to him? I think at this point, it's important to have flexibility.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
Illuminaire
Veteran
Posts: 2,970
And1: 606
Joined: Jan 04, 2010
 

Re: Official Trade Thread XVI 

Post#1323 » by Illuminaire » Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:13 pm

Yeah.... Milsap is probably just a role player on a really good, contending team. Maybe he's your 5th best starter, or your super sub. Either way, he's not worth paying that much money to while we're still laying our foundation.
User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: Re: Official Trade Thread XVI 

Post#1324 » by sfam » Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:33 pm

Illuminaire wrote:Fun random board observation:

Everyone who likes Vesely at six is also a passionate Blatche supporter.

Make of that what you will.

Except for me. I'd be happy dumping blatche for a good ham on rye, and I would be OK With Jan...
User avatar
Illuminaire
Veteran
Posts: 2,970
And1: 606
Joined: Jan 04, 2010
 

Re: Official Trade Thread XVI 

Post#1325 » by Illuminaire » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:01 pm

You ruined everything, sfam. Get out.
User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: Re: Official Trade Thread XVI 

Post#1326 » by sfam » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:40 pm

Illuminaire wrote:You ruined everything, sfam. Get out.

My job is done here. :)
LyricalRico
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 30,560
And1: 851
Joined: May 23, 2002
Location: Back into the fray!
Contact:
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XVI 

Post#1327 » by LyricalRico » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:56 pm

Illuminaire wrote:Yeah.... Milsap is probably just a role player on a really good, contending team. Maybe he's your 5th best starter, or your super sub. Either way, he's not worth paying that much money to while we're still laying our foundation.


Speaking of Blatche...couldn't you say the same thing about him? And he's not even as effective of a player as Milsap. Not sure how someone can be against acquiring Milsap but at the same time insist on keeping Blatche.
theboomking
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,597
And1: 20
Joined: Jan 10, 2011

Re: Official Trade Thread XVI 

Post#1328 » by theboomking » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:05 pm

So if McGee is off of the table, which I hope he isn't, is there another package you guys think we could put together for the #2 pick?
User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: Re: Official Trade Thread XVI 

Post#1329 » by sfam » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:08 pm

theboomking wrote:So if McGee is off of the table, which I hope he isn't, is there another package you guys think we could put together for the #2 pick?

Lots of draft picks. #6 this year and unprotected next year, and perhaps another lower pick.
Scabs304
General Manager
Posts: 8,146
And1: 38
Joined: Feb 21, 2001
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Contact:
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XVI 

Post#1330 » by Scabs304 » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:14 pm

Who would be interested in Iggy? I would be more than willing to trade the 6th, 18th, Rashard Lewis for him and Nocioni. I'm not sure if this is anywhere close to what the Sixers are looking for, but I think this would improve are team greatly. Unless we think Leonard is going to be as good (I really don't like us going PF/C with all the picks we have used recently).
I am Scabs.
theboomking
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,597
And1: 20
Joined: Jan 10, 2011

Re: Re: Official Trade Thread XVI 

Post#1331 » by theboomking » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:18 pm

sfam wrote:
theboomking wrote:So if McGee is off of the table, which I hope he isn't, is there another package you guys think we could put together for the #2 pick?

Lots of draft picks. #6 this year and unprotected next year, and perhaps another lower pick.


Sfam, do you think Minnesota would be interested? Would you give up Crawford, #6 and the unprotected pick next year? I have a hard time seeing that tempt the Wolves.
User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: Re: Official Trade Thread XVI 

Post#1332 » by sfam » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:18 pm

Scabs304 wrote:Who would be interested in Iggy? I would be more than willing to trade the 6th, 18th, Rashard Lewis for him and Nocioni. I'm not sure if this is anywhere close to what the Sixers are looking for, but I think this would improve are team greatly. Unless we think Leonard is going to be as good (I really don't like us going PF/C with all the picks we have used recently).

I don't think anyone would be interested in Iggy.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,521
And1: 10,288
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XVI 

Post#1333 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Sat Jun 18, 2011 3:07 am

Ruzious wrote:Milsap's a good solid player. The problem I have with acquiring him is paying around 7 mil each of his remaining 2 contracted years and then having to extend him at probably a raise. He's good to have on your team, but do you want to commit that kind of money to him? I think at this point, it's important to have flexibility.


+1

The time to get Millsap was at draft day. He would have been a better selection than Pecherov (and we knew this at the time, a few of us). However, that ship has sailed. At his present contract, Millsap's not a value player any longer.

I would still trade him for Blatche, but that's as far as I'd go.
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
User avatar
Hoopalotta
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,937
And1: 3
Joined: Jun 27, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread XVI 

Post#1334 » by Hoopalotta » Sat Jun 18, 2011 7:35 am

Ruzious wrote:Milsap's a good solid player. The problem I have with acquiring him is paying around 7 mil each of his remaining 2 contracted years and then having to extend him at probably a raise. He's good to have on your team, but do you want to commit that kind of money to him? I think at this point, it's important to have flexibility.


I wouldn't necessarily mind the money being paid out to Milsap over the next two years specifically, but I definitely am wary of those "oh, by the way, my contract ends at the exact moment when you just know I'm about to fall off, but I can still demand a big extension that I'll never live up to based on my recent production."

I hate that.

Jos' Smiff scares me a little bit that way too, though I'm thinking he might be available for not much pending the CBA if a team can offer Atlanta BIG salary savings, so I've kind of got my eye on that.

In each case, if four year guaranteed contracts are the max and you could formally extend Smiff or Milsap out two more years past when their contracts expire, I like it a lot better than if you actually hit them with four (or five) year deals directly after they expire. As of now and the current CBA, Milsap wouldn't be eligible for an extension as he's only played two years on his deal.

[As an aside, amnesty Rashard and then Blatche and Booker for Smiff and Marvelous if the 2012 draft is going to stink? It's hard on talent for them, but totally rectifies their otherwise near untenable ledger books. You've got to question the ceiling for us, but if the 2012 draft is smashed by the CBA upending one-and-dones and we can't sign Dwight, I don't know what better options there would be. I wouldn't have liked it previously, but Dray floundering and hypothetically having two stale-turd drafts consecutively would alter my thinking].
Image
jangles86
Starter
Posts: 2,376
And1: 981
Joined: Jun 02, 2011
 

Re: Official Trade Thread XVI 

Post#1335 » by jangles86 » Sat Jun 18, 2011 12:00 pm

Im just wondering what you guys think of a couple ideas.

Trade 2012 top 3 protected, pick 18 or 6 (which would be more likely? I'm thinking pick 6)
To Wolves for pick 2.

Where would Williams go in next years draft do we think? Id be happy to get our future Sf out of this.draft instead of the next.

Also who do you guys think has a better offensive game out of mcgee, valanciunus and biyombo?
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,211
And1: 11,410
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XVI 

Post#1336 » by Wizardspride » Sat Jun 18, 2011 12:05 pm

LyricalRico wrote:
Illuminaire wrote:Yeah.... Milsap is probably just a role player on a really good, contending team. Maybe he's your 5th best starter, or your super sub. Either way, he's not worth paying that much money to while we're still laying our foundation.


Speaking of Blatche...couldn't you say the same thing about him? And he's not even as effective of a player as Milsap. Not sure how someone can be against acquiring Milsap but at the same time insist on keeping Blatche.

I'm against acquiring Milsap because I think players like him are limited.

And as for Blatche....i'm not "insisting" that we keep him.

But by the same token, I'm not just giving him away for a 2nd rd pick as you've previously proposed.

Inefficient though he may be, I just happen to think he's a much better player than you do.

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,287
And1: 7,382
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XVI 

Post#1337 » by FAH1223 » Sat Jun 18, 2011 3:49 pm

I'd rather have Millsap at the 4 than Blatche
Image
theboomking
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,597
And1: 20
Joined: Jan 10, 2011

Re: Official Trade Thread XVI 

Post#1338 » by theboomking » Sat Jun 18, 2011 4:23 pm

jangles86 wrote:Im just wondering what you guys think of a couple ideas.

Trade 2012 top 3 protected, pick 18 or 6 (which would be more likely? I'm thinking pick 6)
To Wolves for pick 2.

Where would Williams go in next years draft do we think? Id be happy to get our future Sf out of this.draft instead of the next.

Also who do you guys think has a better offensive game out of mcgee, valanciunus and biyombo?



Word is that Minnesota wants veterans, so I don't think they would take #6 this year and our 1st next year.

Next year, Williams should be right in the mix for a top 3 to 5 pick with Anthony Davis, Harrison Barnes, James McAdoo, Quincy Miller, Michael Gilchrist, Perry Jones, Brad Beal, and Jared Sullinger. I would expect that he would go behind Davis, but could even still go as high as #2.

Valanciunas is supposed to be pretty solid on the P&R, so I think his offensive game is probably the best, then JaVale, then Biyombo, who is a dunk, short layup, and putback guy. That being said, I think Biyombo might immediately be better than the other two on defense.
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,797
And1: 7,922
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread XVI 

Post#1339 » by montestewart » Sat Jun 18, 2011 5:47 pm

theboomking wrote:Word is that Minnesota wants veterans, so I don't think they would take #6 this year and our 1st next year.

How about a six-year veteran C/PF with 20/10 potential and passing skills, along with the #6. You think we could sell that?
jangles86
Starter
Posts: 2,376
And1: 981
Joined: Jun 02, 2011
 

Re: Official Trade Thread XVI 

Post#1340 » by jangles86 » Sun Jun 19, 2011 8:10 am

theboomking wrote:
jangles86 wrote:Im just wondering what you guys think of a couple ideas.

Trade 2012 top 3 protected, pick 18 or 6 (which would be more likely? I'm thinking pick 6)
To Wolves for pick 2.

Where would Williams go in next years draft do we think? Id be happy to get our future Sf out of this.draft instead of the next.

Also who do you guys think has a better offensive game out of mcgee, valanciunus and biyombo?



Word is that Minnesota wants veterans, so I don't think they would take #6 this year and our 1st next year.

Next year, Williams should be right in the mix for a top 3 to 5 pick with Anthony Davis, Harrison Barnes, James McAdoo, Quincy Miller, Michael Gilchrist, Perry Jones, Brad Beal, and Jared Sullinger. I would expect that he would go behind Davis, but could even still go as high as #2.

Valanciunas is supposed to be pretty solid on the P&R, so I think his offensive game is probably the best, then JaVale, then Biyombo, who is a dunk, short layup, and putback guy. That being said, I think Biyombo might immediately be better than the other two on defense.


Thanks alot for the info mate.

I wouldnt mind seeing us grab Biyombo at 18 but that looks pretty unlikely with the knicks being keen at 17.

I would love us to somehow get Jimeer Fredette aswell, Im sure this fellas game will translate extremely well in the NBA. Be a great back up to Wall.

Return to Washington Wizards